A comprehensive comparison of passive flow controls on the wind turbine blade lift and drag performances: A CFD approach

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Mohd Hafiz Ab Satar, N.A. Razak, Mohd Safie Abdullah, Farzad Ismal
{"title":"A comprehensive comparison of passive flow controls on the wind turbine blade lift and drag performances: A CFD approach","authors":"Mohd Hafiz Ab Satar,&nbsp;N.A. Razak,&nbsp;Mohd Safie Abdullah,&nbsp;Farzad Ismal","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flow control techniques used on wind turbines have been shown to significantly increase energy generation when compared to traditional wind turbines. Although various flow control methods have been introduced in the last two decades, the comparison between these methods is still the least conducted by researchers. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the performance of an airfoil utilizing both single and dual passive flow control methods, such as droop, flap, microcylinder, slot, and spoiler with optimal parameters. In this study, a numerical model was developed and applied with the same boundary conditions as those in the experiment. The results of the developed numerical simulation were then validated with experimental and other numerical studies. Mosaic mesh was utilized and the results were compared with conventional mesh types. Even though the mosaic mesh requires a lower number of computational elements, it demonstrated higher computational accuracy when compared to hexcore, polyhedra and tetrahedral type meshes. After obtaining an accurate numerical model, parametric studies were then conducted. The findings mainly highlighted that the airfoil with a microcylinder consistently generated higher performance than droop, flap, spoiler, slot and conventional airfoil. The mean relative improvement was about 2.6%. In an extensive study, eight combinations of flow controls were proposed and evaluated. The highest performances were achieved with the combination of microcylinder and flap, up to 27.9% and the combination of microcylinder and slot, reaching up to 50.2%, for low and high AOAs, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11985,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","volume":"108 ","pages":"Pages 119-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow control techniques used on wind turbines have been shown to significantly increase energy generation when compared to traditional wind turbines. Although various flow control methods have been introduced in the last two decades, the comparison between these methods is still the least conducted by researchers. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the performance of an airfoil utilizing both single and dual passive flow control methods, such as droop, flap, microcylinder, slot, and spoiler with optimal parameters. In this study, a numerical model was developed and applied with the same boundary conditions as those in the experiment. The results of the developed numerical simulation were then validated with experimental and other numerical studies. Mosaic mesh was utilized and the results were compared with conventional mesh types. Even though the mosaic mesh requires a lower number of computational elements, it demonstrated higher computational accuracy when compared to hexcore, polyhedra and tetrahedral type meshes. After obtaining an accurate numerical model, parametric studies were then conducted. The findings mainly highlighted that the airfoil with a microcylinder consistently generated higher performance than droop, flap, spoiler, slot and conventional airfoil. The mean relative improvement was about 2.6%. In an extensive study, eight combinations of flow controls were proposed and evaluated. The highest performances were achieved with the combination of microcylinder and flap, up to 27.9% and the combination of microcylinder and slot, reaching up to 50.2%, for low and high AOAs, respectively.

全面比较被动流控制对风力涡轮机叶片升力和阻力性能的影响:CFD 方法
与传统风力涡轮机相比,风力涡轮机上使用的流量控制技术可显著提高发电量。尽管在过去二十年中已经引入了各种流量控制方法,但研究人员对这些方法进行的比较仍然最少。因此,本研究旨在评估采用单一和双重被动流量控制方法(如垂流、襟翼、微气缸、槽和扰流板)的机翼的性能,并给出最佳参数。本研究开发并应用了一个数值模型,其边界条件与实验中的相同。然后将所开发的数值模拟结果与实验和其他数值研究结果进行了验证。采用了镶嵌网格,并将结果与传统网格类型进行了比较。尽管马赛克网格所需的计算元素数量较少,但与六核、多面体和四面体网格相比,其计算精度更高。在获得精确的数值模型后,又进行了参数研究。研究结果主要表明,与垂尾、襟翼、扰流板、插槽和传统机翼相比,微气缸机翼始终能产生更高的性能。平均相对改进幅度约为 2.6%。在一项广泛的研究中,提出并评估了八种流量控制组合。微气缸和襟翼的组合性能最高,达到 27.9%;微气缸和槽的组合性能最高,达到 50.2%,分别适用于低和高 AOA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
127
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids publishes papers in all fields of fluid mechanics. Although investigations in well-established areas are within the scope of the journal, recent developments and innovative ideas are particularly welcome. Theoretical, computational and experimental papers are equally welcome. Mathematical methods, be they deterministic or stochastic, analytical or numerical, will be accepted provided they serve to clarify some identifiable problems in fluid mechanics, and provided the significance of results is explained. Similarly, experimental papers must add physical insight in to the understanding of fluid mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信