Food Insecurity: Physician Perspectives, Screening and Communication

PRiMER Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.22454/primer.2024.400838
Sally Heaberlin, Kelly S. Skelly, Marcy Rosenbaum, Stephanie K Bunt
{"title":"Food Insecurity: Physician Perspectives, Screening and Communication","authors":"Sally Heaberlin, Kelly S. Skelly, Marcy Rosenbaum, Stephanie K Bunt","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.400838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Primary care physicians may perceive food insecurity (FI) as a difficult topic to address in health care encounters, resulting in at-risk patients not being identified. This exploratory study examines physician perspectives on how decisions to screen patients for FI are made, effective FI communication strategies, and barriers to screening.\nMethods: Primary care physicians in the statewide, practice-based Iowa Research Network (IRENE) completed a study survey in May 2022 that included structured and open-ended questions regarding their experiences screening for FI. Thematic and descriptive analysis identified common themes in providers’ experiences and perspectives.\nResults: Although most physicians responding to the survey indicated that they have observed FI in their patient population, 27% have never observed FI in their practice. Physicians varied in their reasons for deciding to screen, with the most reported reason being “when it comes up in conversation.” Common screening barriers among respondents included limited appointment time and feeling inadequately prepared to connect patients with resources. Respondents noted that negative experiences with FI screening were rare and noted positive experiences, including gratitude from the patient, and building patient-physician trust. Respondents shared normalizing phrases that helped address the additional obstacle of feeling inadequately prepared to assess FI in a tactful manner.\nConclusions: This study explored physicians' experiences with asking patients about FI and provides insight into FI screening gaps, barriers, and opportunities. Better understanding of physician attitudes and practices may help guide and address barriers to more effective and consistent FI screening.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.400838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary care physicians may perceive food insecurity (FI) as a difficult topic to address in health care encounters, resulting in at-risk patients not being identified. This exploratory study examines physician perspectives on how decisions to screen patients for FI are made, effective FI communication strategies, and barriers to screening. Methods: Primary care physicians in the statewide, practice-based Iowa Research Network (IRENE) completed a study survey in May 2022 that included structured and open-ended questions regarding their experiences screening for FI. Thematic and descriptive analysis identified common themes in providers’ experiences and perspectives. Results: Although most physicians responding to the survey indicated that they have observed FI in their patient population, 27% have never observed FI in their practice. Physicians varied in their reasons for deciding to screen, with the most reported reason being “when it comes up in conversation.” Common screening barriers among respondents included limited appointment time and feeling inadequately prepared to connect patients with resources. Respondents noted that negative experiences with FI screening were rare and noted positive experiences, including gratitude from the patient, and building patient-physician trust. Respondents shared normalizing phrases that helped address the additional obstacle of feeling inadequately prepared to assess FI in a tactful manner. Conclusions: This study explored physicians' experiences with asking patients about FI and provides insight into FI screening gaps, barriers, and opportunities. Better understanding of physician attitudes and practices may help guide and address barriers to more effective and consistent FI screening.
粮食不安全:医生视角、筛查和沟通
导言:初级保健医生可能会认为食物不安全(FI)是一个难以在医疗保健会诊中解决的话题,从而导致高危患者无法被识别出来。这项探索性研究探讨了医生对如何决定对患者进行食物不安全筛查、有效的食物不安全沟通策略以及筛查障碍的看法:2022年5月,全州范围内以实践为基础的爱荷华研究网络(IRENE)中的初级保健医生完成了一项研究调查,其中包括有关他们筛查FI经验的结构化和开放式问题。主题分析和描述性分析确定了医疗服务提供者经验和观点中的共同主题:尽管大多数参与调查的医生表示,他们曾在病人群体中观察到过 FI,但有 27% 的医生从未在诊疗过程中观察到过 FI。医生们决定进行筛查的原因各不相同,其中报告最多的原因是 "在谈话中提及"。受访者中常见的筛查障碍包括预约时间有限以及感觉没有做好充分准备为患者联系资源。受访者指出,FI 筛查的负面经历并不多见,他们还提到了一些积极的经历,包括患者的感激之情以及建立患者与医生之间的信任。受访者分享了一些正常化的短语,这些短语有助于解决在以机智的方式评估 FI 时感到准备不足这一额外障碍:本研究探讨了医生向患者询问 FI 的经验,并提供了有关 FI 筛查差距、障碍和机遇的见解。更好地了解医生的态度和做法可能有助于指导和解决更有效、更一致的 FI 筛查障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信