The best time of weight bearing after ACL reconstruction, immediately or delayed? A randomized clinical trial

Q3 Medicine
Mohsen Mardani-Kivi, Sina Kamrani Moghadam, Amin Izadi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, K. Asadi
{"title":"The best time of weight bearing after ACL reconstruction, immediately or delayed? A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Mohsen Mardani-Kivi, Sina Kamrani Moghadam, Amin Izadi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, K. Asadi","doi":"10.32598/rj.25.2.3803.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Postoperative rehabilitation protocols, such as immobilization and non-weight-bearing periods during the acute phase after ACL surgery, vary depending on the surgeon or the institution, and lack clear standardization. Weight bearing (WB) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is one of the important issues. This study aimed to compare the results of WB immediately after surgery and partial WB with a brace after ACL-R. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial (IRCT20110809007274N17), block random sampling was used to select 84 patients who were divided into two groups: group 1 who were allowed to have full WB after surgery, and group 2 who were asked to use braces after surgery, and they were divided into partial WB for one month and then full WB. Demographic information was recorded. Lachman test, anterior knee pain and kneeling pain before surgery and one months after surgery were also recorded. Knee function was evaluated using IKDC , KOOS and Lysholm scales before surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed in SPSS software using Fisher's exact, Chi-square, Friedman and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Most of the patients were men under 30 years old. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic information of the patients in the two groups. Kneeling pain, anterior knee pain and the Lachman test did not differ between the two groups one month after the surgery. There was no difference between the two groups in the scores of IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm in the 6-month follow-up. All the examined indicators in each group improved over time. Conclusion: It appears WB immediately after surgery compared to partial WB at 1, 3, 6 months after ACL-R do not differ from each other. Therefore, patients can bear full weight if they tolerate it.","PeriodicalId":46374,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/rj.25.2.3803.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative rehabilitation protocols, such as immobilization and non-weight-bearing periods during the acute phase after ACL surgery, vary depending on the surgeon or the institution, and lack clear standardization. Weight bearing (WB) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is one of the important issues. This study aimed to compare the results of WB immediately after surgery and partial WB with a brace after ACL-R. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial (IRCT20110809007274N17), block random sampling was used to select 84 patients who were divided into two groups: group 1 who were allowed to have full WB after surgery, and group 2 who were asked to use braces after surgery, and they were divided into partial WB for one month and then full WB. Demographic information was recorded. Lachman test, anterior knee pain and kneeling pain before surgery and one months after surgery were also recorded. Knee function was evaluated using IKDC , KOOS and Lysholm scales before surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed in SPSS software using Fisher's exact, Chi-square, Friedman and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Most of the patients were men under 30 years old. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic information of the patients in the two groups. Kneeling pain, anterior knee pain and the Lachman test did not differ between the two groups one month after the surgery. There was no difference between the two groups in the scores of IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm in the 6-month follow-up. All the examined indicators in each group improved over time. Conclusion: It appears WB immediately after surgery compared to partial WB at 1, 3, 6 months after ACL-R do not differ from each other. Therefore, patients can bear full weight if they tolerate it.
前交叉韧带重建后的最佳负重时间是立即还是延迟?随机临床试验
目的:前交叉韧带手术后急性期的固定和非负重期等术后康复方案因外科医生或机构而异,缺乏明确的标准化。前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)术后负重(WB)是重要问题之一。本研究旨在比较前交叉韧带重建术(ACL-R)术后立即负重和使用支具进行部分负重的效果。材料和方法:在这项随机临床试验(IRCT20110809007274N17)中,采用整群随机抽样的方法选取了 84 名患者,将其分为两组:第一组允许术后进行完全 WB,第二组要求术后使用支具,分为部分 WB 1 个月和完全 WB。记录人口统计学信息。此外,还记录了术前和术后一个月的拉赫曼试验、膝关节前部疼痛和跪位疼痛。术前、术后 1、3 和 6 个月分别使用 IKDC、KOOS 和 Lysholm 量表评估膝关节功能。数据在 SPSS 软件中使用费雪精确、Chi-square、Friedman 和重复测量方差分析进行分析。结果大多数患者为 30 岁以下的男性。两组患者的人口统计学信息无明显差异。术后一个月,两组患者的跪地、膝关节前部疼痛和 Lachman 试验无差异。在 6 个月的随访中,两组患者的 IKDC、KOOS 和 Lysholm 评分没有差异。随着时间的推移,各组的所有检查指标均有所改善。结论:与前交叉韧带重建术后 1、3、6 个月的部分负重相比,手术后立即负重似乎没有什么不同。因此,如果患者能够耐受,就可以承受全部重量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信