Analysis of gauze pad made from coconut tree fiber infused with guava derived phenolic compounds

R. Suarez, E. Peñamante, L. Carrillo, R. Delfin, T. M. Gotostos, J. Patingan, A. V. Provido, C. M. Ramos, C. Tugade
{"title":"Analysis of gauze pad made from coconut tree fiber infused with guava derived phenolic compounds","authors":"R. Suarez, E. Peñamante, L. Carrillo, R. Delfin, T. M. Gotostos, J. Patingan, A. V. Provido, C. M. Ramos, C. Tugade","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gauze pad wound dressing plays a crucial role in protecting the wound and preventing it from factors that can prolong the healing process. However, due to the porous nature of gauze pads, it cannot completely block microbes from getting into the wound. This study analyzes coconut tree fiber as a gauze pad infused with guava derived phenolic compounds, known for its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. The research assesses the extract’s effectiveness, focusing on phenolic compounds, antioxidant properties, and antimicrobial effects. By employing the disk diffusion method against Staphylococcus aureus, the study reveals that both 50% and 30% extracts exhibit inhibitory activity, with mean zones of inhibition at 8.5 mm and 8.33 mm, respectively, showing the antimicrobial property for both 50% and 30% extracts. The samples also demonstrated notable DPPH radical scavenging capacities for concentrations ranging from 0.006 to 1.27 (%w/v) for the 50% extract sample and from 0.006 to 1.25 for the 30% extract sample, ranging from 1.98% to 68.5% and 7.94% to 69.5%, respectively, indicating antioxidant property for both samples. The researchers have determined that there is no significant difference (p-value = 0.9187, α = 0.05) between the scavenging activity of both 50% and 30% extract. Furthermore, a minimal disparity in total phenolics was observed, with the former containing 1.25 and the latter 1.24 weight percent gallic acid. To determine if there is any negative skin reaction, a patch test was conducted in collaboration with a dermatologist using Stanford Health Care Medicine Standard. The test revealed no adverse skin reactions after three days of no removal usage of the coconut tree fiber gauze pad infused with phenolic compounds, as compared to a commercially available gauze pad. This study underscores the promise of guava extract and its antibacterial properties, particularly against skin pathogens, and its safe application when integrated with coconut fiber. This combination holds potential as a natural antimicrobial agent with diverse applications.","PeriodicalId":506254,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gauze pad wound dressing plays a crucial role in protecting the wound and preventing it from factors that can prolong the healing process. However, due to the porous nature of gauze pads, it cannot completely block microbes from getting into the wound. This study analyzes coconut tree fiber as a gauze pad infused with guava derived phenolic compounds, known for its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. The research assesses the extract’s effectiveness, focusing on phenolic compounds, antioxidant properties, and antimicrobial effects. By employing the disk diffusion method against Staphylococcus aureus, the study reveals that both 50% and 30% extracts exhibit inhibitory activity, with mean zones of inhibition at 8.5 mm and 8.33 mm, respectively, showing the antimicrobial property for both 50% and 30% extracts. The samples also demonstrated notable DPPH radical scavenging capacities for concentrations ranging from 0.006 to 1.27 (%w/v) for the 50% extract sample and from 0.006 to 1.25 for the 30% extract sample, ranging from 1.98% to 68.5% and 7.94% to 69.5%, respectively, indicating antioxidant property for both samples. The researchers have determined that there is no significant difference (p-value = 0.9187, α = 0.05) between the scavenging activity of both 50% and 30% extract. Furthermore, a minimal disparity in total phenolics was observed, with the former containing 1.25 and the latter 1.24 weight percent gallic acid. To determine if there is any negative skin reaction, a patch test was conducted in collaboration with a dermatologist using Stanford Health Care Medicine Standard. The test revealed no adverse skin reactions after three days of no removal usage of the coconut tree fiber gauze pad infused with phenolic compounds, as compared to a commercially available gauze pad. This study underscores the promise of guava extract and its antibacterial properties, particularly against skin pathogens, and its safe application when integrated with coconut fiber. This combination holds potential as a natural antimicrobial agent with diverse applications.
椰子树纤维与番石榴酚类化合物混合制成的纱布垫分析
纱布垫伤口敷料在保护伤口和防止伤口受到可延长愈合过程的因素影响方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,由于纱布垫的多孔性,它无法完全阻止微生物进入伤口。本研究分析了椰子树纤维作为纱布垫注入番石榴提取的酚类化合物的情况,番石榴提取的酚类化合物以其抗菌和抗氧化特性而闻名。研究评估了提取物的功效,重点是酚类化合物、抗氧化特性和抗菌效果。通过对金黄色葡萄球菌采用磁盘扩散法,研究发现 50%和 30%的提取物都具有抑菌活性,平均抑菌区分别为 8.5 毫米和 8.33 毫米,表明 50%和 30%的提取物都具有抗菌特性。样品还显示出显著的 DPPH 自由基清除能力,50% 提取物样品的清除浓度为 0.006 至 1.27(%w/v),30% 提取物样品的清除浓度为 0.006 至 1.25,清除率分别为 1.98% 至 68.5% 和 7.94% 至 69.5%,表明这两种样品都具有抗氧化性。研究人员确定,50% 和 30% 提取物的清除活性之间没有显著差异(P 值 = 0.9187,α = 0.05)。此外,总酚类物质的差异也很小,前者含有 1.25% 的没食子酸,后者含有 1.24% 的没食子酸。为了确定皮肤是否有不良反应,我们与皮肤科医生合作,使用斯坦福大学医疗保健医学标准进行了贴片测试。测试结果表明,与市面上销售的纱布垫相比,使用注入酚类化合物的椰子树纤维纱布垫三天后,皮肤没有出现不良反应。这项研究强调了番石榴提取物及其抗菌特性的前景,尤其是针对皮肤病原体的抗菌特性,以及与椰子纤维结合后的安全应用。这种组合具有天然抗菌剂的潜力,可用于多种用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信