Co-creation in a duopoly considering the effect of product return

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Rui Yang , Lin Feng , Jianxiong Zhang , Xiangqian Li
{"title":"Co-creation in a duopoly considering the effect of product return","authors":"Rui Yang ,&nbsp;Lin Feng ,&nbsp;Jianxiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiangqian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-creation has become popular in experience good markets as it can resolve the uncertainty of the mismatch between product attributes and customer preferences. This paper delves into an examination of how firms strategize product co-creation with their customers in a competitive duopoly context, all the while taking into account the potential product return stemming from mismatch uncertainty. Results show that when the launching cost is moderate and the customer’s participation cost is relatively small, an asymmetric equilibrium with one firm launching the project and the other not is reached; otherwise, both firms adopt co-creation or not, conditional on the launching cost. Besides, firms may fall into a prisoner’s dilemma in which both firms launch the project when the launching cost is moderate. Furthermore, it is shown that co-creation functions as an effective way for firms to escape the Bertrand trap and reap the benefits of the product’s high valuation. Additionally, there is a mutual influence between co-creation and product return. A higher product return cost incentivizes firms to embrace co-creation, but meanwhile, it makes them more susceptible to falling into a prisoner’s dilemma scenario. In a state of equilibrium, co-creation consistently diminishes the product return for the firm engaging in it. Particularly, the firm not providing co-creation can take a free ride on the competitor’s co-creation benefits in reducing product return when the return cost is relatively large. Lastly, the value of co-creation can be amplified through the implementation of a price discrimination strategy, particularly when the participation cost is relatively large.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103140"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-creation has become popular in experience good markets as it can resolve the uncertainty of the mismatch between product attributes and customer preferences. This paper delves into an examination of how firms strategize product co-creation with their customers in a competitive duopoly context, all the while taking into account the potential product return stemming from mismatch uncertainty. Results show that when the launching cost is moderate and the customer’s participation cost is relatively small, an asymmetric equilibrium with one firm launching the project and the other not is reached; otherwise, both firms adopt co-creation or not, conditional on the launching cost. Besides, firms may fall into a prisoner’s dilemma in which both firms launch the project when the launching cost is moderate. Furthermore, it is shown that co-creation functions as an effective way for firms to escape the Bertrand trap and reap the benefits of the product’s high valuation. Additionally, there is a mutual influence between co-creation and product return. A higher product return cost incentivizes firms to embrace co-creation, but meanwhile, it makes them more susceptible to falling into a prisoner’s dilemma scenario. In a state of equilibrium, co-creation consistently diminishes the product return for the firm engaging in it. Particularly, the firm not providing co-creation can take a free ride on the competitor’s co-creation benefits in reducing product return when the return cost is relatively large. Lastly, the value of co-creation can be amplified through the implementation of a price discrimination strategy, particularly when the participation cost is relatively large.

考虑产品回报效应的双元垄断中的共同创造
共同创造可以解决产品属性与客户偏好不匹配的不确定性问题,因此在体验产品市场很受欢迎。本文深入研究了在竞争性双头垄断背景下,企业如何与客户制定产品共创战略,同时考虑到错配不确定性带来的潜在产品回报。结果表明,当启动成本适中且客户的参与成本相对较小时,会出现一家企业启动项目而另一家企业不启动项目的非对称均衡;反之,两家企业都会根据启动成本的条件采取共同创造或不采取共同创造。此外,当启动成本适中时,企业可能会陷入囚徒困境,即两家企业都启动项目。此外,研究还表明,共同创造是企业摆脱伯特兰陷阱并从产品的高估值中获益的有效途径。此外,共同创造与产品回报之间存在相互影响。较高的产品回报成本会激励企业进行共同创造,但同时也会使企业更容易陷入囚徒困境。在均衡状态下,共同创造会持续减少参与企业的产品回报。特别是,当回报成本相对较高时,不提供共同创造的企业可以免费利用竞争对手的共同创造收益来降低产品回报。最后,通过实施价格歧视战略,特别是在参与成本相对较大的情况下,共同创造的价值可以放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信