A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery

Nabanita Roy, Md. Babrak Manuar, Moumita Roy, Bimal Kumar Hajra
{"title":"A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery","authors":"Nabanita Roy, Md. Babrak Manuar, Moumita Roy, Bimal Kumar Hajra","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i7.43930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In supraclavicular brachial plexus block, to prolong the duration of analgesia, many adjuvants have been tried in the past in many studies but an ideal adjuvant remains yet to be discovered. Dexmedetomidine, a selective Alfa-2 adrenergic agonist when added to local anesthetic has been reported to prolong the block duration and post-operative analgesia in various regional blocks.\nAims and Objectives: The aims and objectives are to study the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, postoperative analgesia, and hemodynamic effects of addition of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.\nMaterials and Methods: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II, of both sexes, scheduled for upper limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group-A received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine as adjuvant perineurally and Group-B received 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block with dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion at 1 μg/kg over 10 min. Intraoperatively non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, and sedation were recorded every 5 min for the first 10 min and every 15 min thereafter till the end. Time of first rescue analgesic, intensity of postoperative pain, and total analgesic required were recorded.\nResults: Onset of sensory and motor block was faster in Group-A than Group-B. Duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group-A than Group-B. Hemodynamic stability was better maintained in Group-A than Group-B. Sedation was better in Group B.\nConclusion: Dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block is more efficacious in providing faster onset of motor and sensory blocks and prolonging duration of postoperative analgesia with better hemodynamic stability.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i7.43930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In supraclavicular brachial plexus block, to prolong the duration of analgesia, many adjuvants have been tried in the past in many studies but an ideal adjuvant remains yet to be discovered. Dexmedetomidine, a selective Alfa-2 adrenergic agonist when added to local anesthetic has been reported to prolong the block duration and post-operative analgesia in various regional blocks. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives are to study the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, postoperative analgesia, and hemodynamic effects of addition of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II, of both sexes, scheduled for upper limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group-A received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine as adjuvant perineurally and Group-B received 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block with dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion at 1 μg/kg over 10 min. Intraoperatively non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, and sedation were recorded every 5 min for the first 10 min and every 15 min thereafter till the end. Time of first rescue analgesic, intensity of postoperative pain, and total analgesic required were recorded. Results: Onset of sensory and motor block was faster in Group-A than Group-B. Duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group-A than Group-B. Hemodynamic stability was better maintained in Group-A than Group-B. Sedation was better in Group B. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block is more efficacious in providing faster onset of motor and sensory blocks and prolonging duration of postoperative analgesia with better hemodynamic stability.
静脉注射右美托咪定与硬膜外右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因辅助剂用于上肢手术锁骨上臂丛阻滞的疗效比较研究
背景:在锁骨上臂丛阻滞中,为了延长镇痛时间,过去的许多研究尝试了多种辅助剂,但仍未找到理想的辅助剂。据报道,右美托咪定是一种选择性 Alfa-2 肾上腺素能激动剂,加入局麻药后可延长各种区域阻滞的阻滞时间和术后镇痛:目的和目标:研究在锁骨上臂丛阻滞中加入右美托咪定和罗哌卡因后,感觉和运动阻滞的开始和持续时间、术后镇痛以及血液动力学效应:将计划在锁骨上臂丛阻滞下进行上肢手术的 60 名年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会 I 级和 II 级的男女患者随机分为 2 组。A 组接受 20 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因臂丛神经阻滞麻醉,1 微克/千克右美托咪定作为会阴部辅助麻醉剂;B 组接受 20 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因臂丛神经阻滞麻醉,1 微克/千克右美托咪定静脉注射 10 分钟。术中记录无创血压、心率、SpO2 和镇静度,头 10 分钟每 5 分钟记录一次,之后每 15 分钟记录一次,直至结束。记录首次使用镇痛药的时间、术后疼痛强度和所需镇痛药总量:结果:A 组比 B 组更快出现感觉和运动阻滞。A 组的镇痛持续时间比 B 组长。A 组比 B 组更好地保持了血流动力学稳定。B 组的镇静效果更好:结论:在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞术中,右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因的辅助用药,在提供更快的运动和感觉阻滞起效时间、延长术后镇痛持续时间以及更好的血液动力学稳定性方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信