The Gab Project: The Methodological, Epistemological, and Legal Challenges of Studying the Platformized Far-Right

Tim de Winkel, Ludo Gorzeman, Sofie de Wilde de Ligny, Thomas ten Heuvel, Melissa Blekkenhorst, Sander Prins, Mirko Tobias Schäfer
{"title":"The Gab Project: The Methodological, Epistemological, and Legal Challenges of Studying the Platformized Far-Right","authors":"Tim de Winkel, Ludo Gorzeman, Sofie de Wilde de Ligny, Thomas ten Heuvel, Melissa Blekkenhorst, Sander Prins, Mirko Tobias Schäfer","doi":"10.5070/rw3.1448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we describe our five-year research project on the notorious radical free speech service and fringe platform Gab. During these years we scraped an entire platform, prepared it into a dataset for analysis, and opened it up to a broader community of students and researchers. Each of these projects provides us not just with a small slice of platformized far-right culture but also with a larger sphere of a fringe platform. However, the overarching goal of the Gab project was to contribute to a methodology for the study of the contemporary platformized far right. The atypical nature of the project posed many methodological, epistemological, and legal challenges. It therefore kicked off an institutional learning process about the possibilities, legal boundaries, and best practices for research compliant with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this article we argue that the study of the platformized far right should have a thorough understanding of the medium on which the object is present, as well as the methods with which the object is captured. What is more, scholars that use digital tools and data methods for capture and analysis of web platforms must become literate in operating them. Consequently, data-driven research on the far right is naturally interdisciplinary and therefore cooperative and adherent to the principles of open science.","PeriodicalId":496207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Right-Wing Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Right-Wing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/rw3.1448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article we describe our five-year research project on the notorious radical free speech service and fringe platform Gab. During these years we scraped an entire platform, prepared it into a dataset for analysis, and opened it up to a broader community of students and researchers. Each of these projects provides us not just with a small slice of platformized far-right culture but also with a larger sphere of a fringe platform. However, the overarching goal of the Gab project was to contribute to a methodology for the study of the contemporary platformized far right. The atypical nature of the project posed many methodological, epistemological, and legal challenges. It therefore kicked off an institutional learning process about the possibilities, legal boundaries, and best practices for research compliant with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this article we argue that the study of the platformized far right should have a thorough understanding of the medium on which the object is present, as well as the methods with which the object is captured. What is more, scholars that use digital tools and data methods for capture and analysis of web platforms must become literate in operating them. Consequently, data-driven research on the far right is naturally interdisciplinary and therefore cooperative and adherent to the principles of open science.
加布项目:研究平台化极右翼的方法论、认识论和法律挑战
在这篇文章中,我们介绍了我们针对臭名昭著的激进自由言论服务和边缘平台 Gab 开展的为期五年的研究项目。在这些年里,我们废止了整个平台,将其制作成数据集进行分析,并向更广泛的学生和研究人员社区开放。这些项目不仅为我们提供了极右翼文化平台化的一小部分,也为我们提供了边缘平台的更大范围。然而,加布项目的总体目标是为研究当代平台化极右翼贡献方法论。该项目的非典型性质带来了许多方法论、认识论和法律方面的挑战。因此,它开启了一个机构学习过程,学习符合《一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)的研究的可能性、法律界限和最佳实践。在这篇文章中,我们认为对平台化极右翼的研究应透彻了解对象的存在媒介以及捕捉对象的方法。更重要的是,使用数字工具和数据方法对网络平台进行捕捉和分析的学者必须具备操作数字工具和数据方法的素养。因此,以数据为驱动的极右翼研究自然是跨学科的,因此也是合作的,并坚持开放科学的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信