Impact of Financial Regulations on Bank Profitability in Uganda

Aziz Fadhul
{"title":"Impact of Financial Regulations on Bank Profitability in Uganda","authors":"Aziz Fadhul","doi":"10.47672/ajf.2169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of financial regulations on bank profitability in Uganda. \nMethodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. \nFindings: Financial regulations significantly influence bank profitability, primarily by affecting operational costs, risk management practices, and lending activities. Stricter capital requirements, such as those imposed by Basel III, generally enhance financial stability but may reduce profitability by limiting leverage and increasing the cost of compliance. Regulatory measures aimed at consumer protection and transparency, while beneficial for market integrity, can also impose additional administrative burdens and costs on banks. Conversely, deregulation periods often see increased profitability due to relaxed constraints on lending and investment activities. However, this can come at the expense of higher risk exposure and potential financial instability. Overall, the balance between regulatory stringency and bank profitability hinges on the specific regulations in place and the banks' ability to adapt and innovate within those frameworks. \nImplications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Agency theory, capital structure theory and information asymmetry theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of financial regulations on bank profitability in Uganda. Practitioners should advocate for risk-based regulation that tailors regulatory requirements to banks' risk profiles and systemic importance. Policymakers should prioritize efforts to harmonize financial regulations across jurisdictions, especially in global banking hubs.       ","PeriodicalId":518059,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Finance","volume":"75 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajf.2169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of financial regulations on bank profitability in Uganda. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Financial regulations significantly influence bank profitability, primarily by affecting operational costs, risk management practices, and lending activities. Stricter capital requirements, such as those imposed by Basel III, generally enhance financial stability but may reduce profitability by limiting leverage and increasing the cost of compliance. Regulatory measures aimed at consumer protection and transparency, while beneficial for market integrity, can also impose additional administrative burdens and costs on banks. Conversely, deregulation periods often see increased profitability due to relaxed constraints on lending and investment activities. However, this can come at the expense of higher risk exposure and potential financial instability. Overall, the balance between regulatory stringency and bank profitability hinges on the specific regulations in place and the banks' ability to adapt and innovate within those frameworks. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Agency theory, capital structure theory and information asymmetry theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of financial regulations on bank profitability in Uganda. Practitioners should advocate for risk-based regulation that tailors regulatory requirements to banks' risk profiles and systemic importance. Policymakers should prioritize efforts to harmonize financial regulations across jurisdictions, especially in global banking hubs.       
乌干达金融法规对银行盈利能力的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估乌干达金融监管对银行盈利能力的影响。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究法。案头研究设计通常被称为二手数据收集。这主要是从现有资源中收集数据,因为与实地研究相比,它具有成本低的优势。我们目前的研究调查了已经出版的研究和报告,因为这些数据很容易通过在线期刊和图书馆获取。研究结果金融法规主要通过影响运营成本、风险管理实践和贷款活动,对银行的盈利能力产生重大影响。更严格的资本要求(如《巴塞尔协议 III》所规定的要求)通常会增强金融稳定性,但可能会限制杠杆作用并增加合规成本,从而降低盈利能力。旨在保护消费者和提高透明度的监管措施虽然有利于市场诚信,但也会给银行带来额外的行政负担和成本。相反,放松管制时期,由于放宽了对贷款和投资活动的限制,盈利能力往往会提高。然而,这可能是以更高的风险敞口和潜在的金融不稳定性为代价的。总体而言,监管严格性与银行盈利能力之间的平衡取决于现行的具体法规以及银行在这些框架内的适应和创新能力。对理论、实践和政策的影响:代理理论、资本结构理论和信息不对称理论可用于今后评估金融监管对乌干达银行盈利能力影响的研究。从业人员应倡导基于风险的监管,根据银行的风险状况和系统重要性调整监管要求。政策制定者应优先考虑协调各辖区的金融监管,特别是在全球银行业中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信