The importance of ward-based education in the postoperative assessment of free flaps

G. D. Dounas, J. Willet, Anton I Alvaro, Lucinda Van de Ven, Mjd Wagstaff
{"title":"The importance of ward-based education in the postoperative assessment of free flaps","authors":"G. D. Dounas, J. Willet, Anton I Alvaro, Lucinda Van de Ven, Mjd Wagstaff","doi":"10.34239/ajops.90089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the theoretical and practical advantages of adjunct-based free flap failure detection, the introduction of ultrasonographic techniques has not changed free flap failures rates and their use remains secondary to clinical assessment. Our study aims to develop an educational framework to improve the confidence of nursing staff caring for free flaps, with an emphasis on early detection of flap failure, thereby improving postoperative outcomes. Methods: Nursing staff in intensive care units and surgical wards caring for free flaps completed standardised questionnaires either before or after an educational seminar detailing clinical and Doppler assessment of free flaps. Differences between cohorts were summarised descriptively with frequencies and percentages. Overall confidence scores for pre-education and post-education cohorts were compared. Results: Overall, 173 responses were collected. Most staff were from intensive care units (n = 114) and almost one-third completed surveys following the educational intervention (n = 51). Microsurgical ward staff had more experience in the postoperative care of free flaps than intensive care unit staff (29% vs 18% had experience caring for > 50 free flap cases). Confidence in assessing a free flap by clinical, implantable Doppler or external Doppler ultrasound was universally increased among ward staff compared to intensive care unit staff (p ≤ 0.007). Altogether, 51 per cent of intensive care unit staff had never identified a failing flap compared with 35 per cent of ward staff. Education increased confidence in managing and escalating failing flaps unanimously. Most failing flaps were identified by clinical assessment alone or combined with adjunct-based methods (94%). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the provision of targeted education for nursing staff, both in intensive care units and on surgical wards, is useful for increasing confidence in the clinical assessment and early detection of free flap compromise. Increased confidence and improved clinical assessment may allow for early intervention and improved salvage rates for a threatened free flap, thereby improving patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"61 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.90089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the theoretical and practical advantages of adjunct-based free flap failure detection, the introduction of ultrasonographic techniques has not changed free flap failures rates and their use remains secondary to clinical assessment. Our study aims to develop an educational framework to improve the confidence of nursing staff caring for free flaps, with an emphasis on early detection of flap failure, thereby improving postoperative outcomes. Methods: Nursing staff in intensive care units and surgical wards caring for free flaps completed standardised questionnaires either before or after an educational seminar detailing clinical and Doppler assessment of free flaps. Differences between cohorts were summarised descriptively with frequencies and percentages. Overall confidence scores for pre-education and post-education cohorts were compared. Results: Overall, 173 responses were collected. Most staff were from intensive care units (n = 114) and almost one-third completed surveys following the educational intervention (n = 51). Microsurgical ward staff had more experience in the postoperative care of free flaps than intensive care unit staff (29% vs 18% had experience caring for > 50 free flap cases). Confidence in assessing a free flap by clinical, implantable Doppler or external Doppler ultrasound was universally increased among ward staff compared to intensive care unit staff (p ≤ 0.007). Altogether, 51 per cent of intensive care unit staff had never identified a failing flap compared with 35 per cent of ward staff. Education increased confidence in managing and escalating failing flaps unanimously. Most failing flaps were identified by clinical assessment alone or combined with adjunct-based methods (94%). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the provision of targeted education for nursing staff, both in intensive care units and on surgical wards, is useful for increasing confidence in the clinical assessment and early detection of free flap compromise. Increased confidence and improved clinical assessment may allow for early intervention and improved salvage rates for a threatened free flap, thereby improving patient outcomes.
病房教育在游离皮瓣术后评估中的重要性
背景:尽管基于辅助手段的游离皮瓣失败检测具有理论和实践上的优势,但超声技术的引入并未改变游离皮瓣的失败率,其使用仍是临床评估的次要手段。我们的研究旨在制定一个教育框架,以提高护理人员护理游离皮瓣的信心,重点是早期发现皮瓣失败,从而改善术后效果。研究方法重症监护室和外科病房负责护理游离皮瓣的护理人员在参加详细介绍游离皮瓣临床和多普勒评估的教育研讨会之前或之后填写了标准化问卷。各组之间的差异以频率和百分比进行描述性总结。比较了教育前和教育后组群的总体信心分数。结果:共收集到 173 份回复。大多数员工来自重症监护病房(n = 114),近三分之一的员工在教育干预后完成了调查(n = 51)。显微外科病房的医护人员在游离皮瓣术后护理方面比重症监护病房的医护人员更有经验(29% 比 18% 有超过 50 例游离皮瓣护理经验)。与重症监护室人员相比,病房人员通过临床、植入式多普勒或体外多普勒超声评估游离皮瓣的信心普遍提高(p ≤ 0.007)。与 35% 的病房员工相比,51% 的重症监护室员工从未发现过失败的皮瓣。教育一致增强了管理和升级失败皮瓣的信心。大多数失败的皮瓣都是通过单独的临床评估或结合辅助方法(94%)发现的。结论:这项研究表明,为重症监护病房和外科病房的护理人员提供有针对性的教育,有助于提高他们对临床评估的信心,并及早发现游离皮瓣受损的情况。信心的增强和临床评估的改进可实现早期干预,提高受威胁游离皮瓣的挽救率,从而改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信