A comparison of Finite difference schemes to Finite volume scheme for axially symmetric 2D heat equation

Ramesh Chandra Timsina
{"title":"A comparison of Finite difference schemes to Finite volume scheme for axially symmetric 2D heat equation","authors":"Ramesh Chandra Timsina","doi":"10.3126/nmsr.v41i1.67461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we compare finite difference schemes to finite volume scheme for axially symmetric 2D heat equation with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. Using cylindrical coordinate geometry, we describe a mathematical model of axially symmetric heat conduction for a stationary, homogeneous isotrophic solid with uniform thermal conductivity in a hollow cylinder with an exact solution in a particular case. We obtain the numerical solution of the PDE adapting finite difference and finite volume discretization techniques. Compared to the exact solution, we explore that the numerical schemes are the sufficient tools for the solution of linear or nonlinear PDE with prescribed boundary conditions. Furthermore, the numerical solution discrepancies in the results obtained from Explicit, Implicit and Crank-Nicolson schemes in Finite Difference Method (FDM) are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of Dirichlet boundary condition. The solution from the Explicit scheme is slightly far from the exactsolution and the solutions from Implicit and Crank-Nicolson schemes are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of Neumann boundary condition. Likewise, the numerical solutions obtained in the Finite volume method (FVM) are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of the Dirichlet boundary condition and slightly away from the exact solution in the case of the Neumann boundary condition.","PeriodicalId":165940,"journal":{"name":"The Nepali Mathematical Sciences Report","volume":"67 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nepali Mathematical Sciences Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmsr.v41i1.67461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we compare finite difference schemes to finite volume scheme for axially symmetric 2D heat equation with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. Using cylindrical coordinate geometry, we describe a mathematical model of axially symmetric heat conduction for a stationary, homogeneous isotrophic solid with uniform thermal conductivity in a hollow cylinder with an exact solution in a particular case. We obtain the numerical solution of the PDE adapting finite difference and finite volume discretization techniques. Compared to the exact solution, we explore that the numerical schemes are the sufficient tools for the solution of linear or nonlinear PDE with prescribed boundary conditions. Furthermore, the numerical solution discrepancies in the results obtained from Explicit, Implicit and Crank-Nicolson schemes in Finite Difference Method (FDM) are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of Dirichlet boundary condition. The solution from the Explicit scheme is slightly far from the exactsolution and the solutions from Implicit and Crank-Nicolson schemes are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of Neumann boundary condition. Likewise, the numerical solutions obtained in the Finite volume method (FVM) are extremely close to the exact solution in the case of the Dirichlet boundary condition and slightly away from the exact solution in the case of the Neumann boundary condition.
轴对称二维热方程的有限差分方案与有限体积方案的比较
在这项研究中,我们比较了有限差分方案和有限体积方案对具有 Dirichlet 和 Neumann 边界条件的轴对称二维热方程的影响。利用圆柱坐标几何,我们描述了一个轴对称热传导数学模型,该模型适用于中空圆柱体中具有均匀导热性能的静止、均质等养固体,并在特定情况下具有精确解。我们采用有限差分和有限体积离散技术获得了 PDE 的数值解。与精确解相比,我们发现数值方案是解决具有规定边界条件的线性或非线性 PDE 的充分工具。此外,在迪里夏特边界条件下,有限差分法(FDM)中的显式、隐式和 Crank-Nicolson 方案所得到的数值解结果的差异与精确解极为接近。在 Neumann 边界条件下,显式方案的解与精确解略有差距,而隐式和 Crank-Nicolson 方案的解与精确解极为接近。同样,用有限体积法(FVM)求得的数值解在 Dirichlet 边界条件情况下与精确解极为接近,而在 Neumann 边界条件情况下与精确解略有差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信