Naive Bayes and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method for Whey Protein Product Selection in Fitness

Aditya Maulana Azanzi Girsang, Abdul Halim Hasugian
{"title":"Naive Bayes and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method for Whey Protein Product Selection in Fitness","authors":"Aditya Maulana Azanzi Girsang, Abdul Halim Hasugian","doi":"10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fitness is one of the most popular muscle-building sports for people of all ages. Meeting the body's protein needs can be through real food (daily food) such as meat, fish, nuts. However, it is not easy to meet daily protein through daily food alone, so with the existence of whey protein products everyone can meet their daily protein needs without having to add more food portions. The number of whey protein products on the market causes confusion among users in choosing the right product for their daily protein needs. The purpose of the research conducted by the author is to classify the types of whey protein products using the Naïve Bayes method and make recommendations for the best whey protein products based on their type using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The results showed that in the classification of whey protein product types using the Naïve Bayes method, the Naïve Bayes method can classify well. The accuracy value obtained by the Naïve Bayes method in this study is 66.67%. This value is obtained because there are two products whose classification does not match the predetermined label. Things like this are natural because the probabilities used between products have a range that is not far away. The Simple Additive Weighting method succeeded in ranking the best whey protein products based on the Simple Additive Weighting method where the first rank was occupied by Optimum Nutrition Whey Gold Standard (WGS) with a value of 82.5 and the product with the lowest value was BSN Syntha 6 Ultra Premium Protein Matrix with a value of 22.5.","PeriodicalId":15605,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing","volume":"30 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fitness is one of the most popular muscle-building sports for people of all ages. Meeting the body's protein needs can be through real food (daily food) such as meat, fish, nuts. However, it is not easy to meet daily protein through daily food alone, so with the existence of whey protein products everyone can meet their daily protein needs without having to add more food portions. The number of whey protein products on the market causes confusion among users in choosing the right product for their daily protein needs. The purpose of the research conducted by the author is to classify the types of whey protein products using the Naïve Bayes method and make recommendations for the best whey protein products based on their type using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The results showed that in the classification of whey protein product types using the Naïve Bayes method, the Naïve Bayes method can classify well. The accuracy value obtained by the Naïve Bayes method in this study is 66.67%. This value is obtained because there are two products whose classification does not match the predetermined label. Things like this are natural because the probabilities used between products have a range that is not far away. The Simple Additive Weighting method succeeded in ranking the best whey protein products based on the Simple Additive Weighting method where the first rank was occupied by Optimum Nutrition Whey Gold Standard (WGS) with a value of 82.5 and the product with the lowest value was BSN Syntha 6 Ultra Premium Protein Matrix with a value of 22.5.
用于健身乳清蛋白产品选择的 Naive Bayes 和简单加权法 (SAW)
健身是最受各年龄段人群欢迎的肌肉锻炼运动之一。满足人体对蛋白质的需求可以通过肉类、鱼类、坚果等真正的食物(日常食物)来实现。然而,仅通过日常食物来满足日常蛋白质需求并不容易,因此,乳清蛋白产品的出现让每个人都能满足日常蛋白质需求,而无需增加食物的份量。市场上乳清蛋白产品数量众多,导致用户在选择满足日常蛋白质需求的产品时感到困惑。笔者开展研究的目的是使用奈伊夫贝叶斯方法对乳清蛋白产品的类型进行分类,并使用简单加权法(SAW)根据乳清蛋白产品的类型推荐最佳乳清蛋白产品。结果表明,在使用奈伊夫贝叶斯方法对乳清蛋白产品类型进行分类时,奈伊夫贝叶斯方法的分类效果良好。在本研究中,奈伊夫贝叶斯方法获得的准确率为 66.67%。获得这一数值的原因是有两个产品的分类与预定标签不符。这种情况是很自然的,因为产品之间使用的概率范围并不遥远。简单添加剂加权法成功地根据简单添加剂加权法对最佳乳清蛋白产品进行了排名,其中排名第一的是Optimum Nutrition公司的黄金标准乳清蛋白(WGS),数值为82.5,数值最低的产品是BSN Syntha 6 Ultra Premium Protein Matrix,数值为22.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信