The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners

D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, S. Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, V. Nadarajah, C. Thuraisingham, Jen-Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman
{"title":"The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners","authors":"D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, S. Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, V. Nadarajah, C. Thuraisingham, Jen-Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman","doi":"10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement.\nMethods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories.\nResults: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration.\nConclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants.\n\nKeywords: Medical Education, Health Profession Education, Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement. Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories. Results: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration. Conclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants. Keywords: Medical Education, Health Profession Education, Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation
东亚和东南亚执业医师的持续专业发展状况
导言:继续医学教育和继续职业发展活动(CME/CPD)可以提高医疗从业人员的业务水平,使他们能够提供高质量的临床医疗服务。然而,各国监督继续医学教育/继续职业发展活动的系统以及围绕设计、实施和认证的流程却大相径庭。本研究从执业医师的角度探讨了东亚和东南亚地区继续医学教育/继续职业培训的现状,并提出了改进建议:方法:在香港、印度尼西亚、马来西亚、新加坡和台湾的五家机构开展了一项多中心研究。研究工具是一份包含 28 个项目(27 个李克特五点量表和 1 个开放式项目)的验证问卷,重点是对当前继续医学教育/继续医学发展的内容、流程和差距的看法,并由各参与研究机构的教育专家进一步进行背景分析。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,对开放式项目的数据进行了类似分类:共有 867 名执业医师参与了研究。在对当前继续医学教育/继续医学发展项目的看法方面,75.34%至88.00%的受访者认为继续医学教育/继续医学发展项目提高了他们提供优质临床医疗服务的技能和能力。在制药业支持的继续医学教育/继续职业培训方面,商业影响问题十分明显,只有 30.24%-56.92% 的受访者认为其所在机构的继续医学教育/继续职业培训不存在商业偏见。未来继续医学教育/继续医学发展需要改进的关键领域包括:1)内容和授课方式;2)独立性和资金;3)管理;4)地点和可及性;5)政策和合作:结论:对于参加继续医学教育/继续职业培训的人员来说,主要的考虑因素是:由公正的内容提供者利用不同的学习模式提供可获取的、与实践相关的内容,并遵守透明、严格的认证程序,同时尽量减少行政管理方面的麻烦:医学教育、卫生职业教育、继续职业发展、继续医学教育、认证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信