Social Media, Sentiments and Political Discourse ? An Exploratory Study of the 2021 Canadian Federal Election

Hiba Mohammad Noor, Ozgur Turetken, Mehmet Akgul
{"title":"Social Media, Sentiments and Political Discourse ? An Exploratory Study of the 2021 Canadian Federal Election","authors":"Hiba Mohammad Noor, Ozgur Turetken, Mehmet Akgul","doi":"10.1145/3665450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media are widely used for online political discourse. Opinions shared on social media have different sentiments associated with them. Given the very high adoption rates of Twitter (now X) among adults, those who share their opinions on Twitter (X) not only represent a sizable segment of the society, but also influence (through emotion contagion) an even larger segment who are passive (non-contributing) users of the platform. Further, the discourse that is initiated on Twitter (X) typically spreads to other more traditional media. As a result, Twitter (X) is influential, which makes it useful to understand the factors related to the sentiments expressed in tweets. Such understanding can help policymakers to take actions that align with public needs and priorities. This research focuses on identifying the drivers (keywords) of sentiments associated with political discourse on Twitter (X). We also explore virality, i.e., how much a message (the tweet) spreads, and the relationship between sentiments and virality. Finally, we explore whether the clustering of tweets among sentiment and virality groups can improve the potential of social media content for predicting election results. Sentiment Analysis of 764,000 tweets related to the 2021 Canadian Federal election was followed by text clustering to identify sentiment-driving topics. We found some keywords predominantly present within a positive or negative sentiment that are suggestive of entities or ideas to invest in or mitigate by political decision makers. We were also able to find partial evidence for “negativity bias” by detecting a negative relationship between sentiment (positivity) and virality (number of retweets). Finally, we demonstrated that high positivity on the political discourse does not reflect election outcomes and examining Twitter (X) content in more neutral groups can improve predictive power. Our findings have implications for political decision makers and social media analytics researchers.","PeriodicalId":486759,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on social computing","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM transactions on social computing","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3665450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media are widely used for online political discourse. Opinions shared on social media have different sentiments associated with them. Given the very high adoption rates of Twitter (now X) among adults, those who share their opinions on Twitter (X) not only represent a sizable segment of the society, but also influence (through emotion contagion) an even larger segment who are passive (non-contributing) users of the platform. Further, the discourse that is initiated on Twitter (X) typically spreads to other more traditional media. As a result, Twitter (X) is influential, which makes it useful to understand the factors related to the sentiments expressed in tweets. Such understanding can help policymakers to take actions that align with public needs and priorities. This research focuses on identifying the drivers (keywords) of sentiments associated with political discourse on Twitter (X). We also explore virality, i.e., how much a message (the tweet) spreads, and the relationship between sentiments and virality. Finally, we explore whether the clustering of tweets among sentiment and virality groups can improve the potential of social media content for predicting election results. Sentiment Analysis of 764,000 tweets related to the 2021 Canadian Federal election was followed by text clustering to identify sentiment-driving topics. We found some keywords predominantly present within a positive or negative sentiment that are suggestive of entities or ideas to invest in or mitigate by political decision makers. We were also able to find partial evidence for “negativity bias” by detecting a negative relationship between sentiment (positivity) and virality (number of retweets). Finally, we demonstrated that high positivity on the political discourse does not reflect election outcomes and examining Twitter (X) content in more neutral groups can improve predictive power. Our findings have implications for political decision makers and social media analytics researchers.
社交媒体、情绪和政治言论?对 2021 年加拿大联邦大选的探索性研究
社交媒体被广泛用于在线政治讨论。在社交媒体上分享的观点会引发不同的情绪。鉴于推特(现为 X)在成年人中的采用率非常高,在推特(X)上分享观点的人不仅代表了社会中相当大的一部分人,而且(通过情绪传染)影响了更大一部分被动(非贡献)使用该平台的人。此外,在推特(X)上发起的讨论通常会传播到其他更传统的媒体上。因此,Twitter(X)是有影响力的,这使得了解与推文中表达的情绪相关的因素变得非常有用。这种了解有助于决策者采取符合公众需求和优先事项的行动。本研究的重点是识别与 Twitter (X) 上政治言论相关的情绪驱动因素(关键词)。我们还探讨了病毒性,即信息(推特)的传播程度,以及情绪和病毒性之间的关系。最后,我们将探讨将推文按情绪和病毒性分组是否能提高社交媒体内容预测选举结果的潜力。我们对 764,000 条与 2021 年加拿大联邦大选相关的推文进行了情感分析,然后进行了文本聚类,以确定情感驱动主题。我们发现一些关键词主要出现在积极或消极情绪中,这些情绪暗示了政治决策者应投资或减少投资的实体或想法。我们还通过检测情感(积极性)与病毒性(转发数)之间的负相关关系,找到了 "消极偏差 "的部分证据。最后,我们证明了政治言论中的高积极性并不能反映选举结果,而将推特(X)内容分到更中立的群体中进行研究可以提高预测能力。我们的研究结果对政治决策者和社交媒体分析研究人员都有借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信