An approach to intercultural training deemphasizing cross-cultural differences

Y. Poortinga
{"title":"An approach to intercultural training deemphasizing cross-cultural differences","authors":"Y. Poortinga","doi":"10.1108/tpm-10-2023-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to present an approach to intercultural training (IT) in which course participants are informed about various approaches to differences between peoples. Pitfalls in communication are identified that are due to overgeneralization of incidental observations of behavior and to psychological mechanisms such as stereotyping, ethnocentrism and attribution. Effects of poor command of a second language and paralinguistic factors are also included.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIntercultural communication training or IT programs often over-generalize incidental observations and make attributions about broad differences between “us” and “others”. An approach to IT is described that challenges the way in which notions about “culture” and “cultures” tend to be used.\n\n\nFindings\nA training module based on the principles mentioned is described that was originally developed for military officers preparing for international peace-keeping and peace-building missions and later has been administered in various settings and countries.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAn exit questionnaire and postmission interviews have suggested positive effects of the training, but more systematic evaluation research is needed.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCross-cultural communication (3C) training is mostly about how other people differ from “us”. Better understanding may be gained with an approach that emphasizes how much humans everywhere are alike and that perceived differences can also be in the eye of the beholder.\n\n\nSocial implications\nMutual understanding is critical to positive interaction. The approach to 3C training taken here explains how much humans everywhere are alike and puts manifest differences into perspective.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe training module builds on available knowledge, notably from cross-cultural psychology. Except for a questionnaire to demonstrate ethnocentrism, there is hardly new information. However, the approach arranges available knowledge in a way that is rather novel for the field of 3C training.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-10-2023-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present an approach to intercultural training (IT) in which course participants are informed about various approaches to differences between peoples. Pitfalls in communication are identified that are due to overgeneralization of incidental observations of behavior and to psychological mechanisms such as stereotyping, ethnocentrism and attribution. Effects of poor command of a second language and paralinguistic factors are also included. Design/methodology/approach Intercultural communication training or IT programs often over-generalize incidental observations and make attributions about broad differences between “us” and “others”. An approach to IT is described that challenges the way in which notions about “culture” and “cultures” tend to be used. Findings A training module based on the principles mentioned is described that was originally developed for military officers preparing for international peace-keeping and peace-building missions and later has been administered in various settings and countries. Research limitations/implications An exit questionnaire and postmission interviews have suggested positive effects of the training, but more systematic evaluation research is needed. Practical implications Cross-cultural communication (3C) training is mostly about how other people differ from “us”. Better understanding may be gained with an approach that emphasizes how much humans everywhere are alike and that perceived differences can also be in the eye of the beholder. Social implications Mutual understanding is critical to positive interaction. The approach to 3C training taken here explains how much humans everywhere are alike and puts manifest differences into perspective. Originality/value The training module builds on available knowledge, notably from cross-cultural psychology. Except for a questionnaire to demonstrate ethnocentrism, there is hardly new information. However, the approach arranges available knowledge in a way that is rather novel for the field of 3C training.
不强调跨文化差异的跨文化培训方法
目的 本文旨在介绍一种跨文化培训(IT)方法,让学员了解处理民族差异的各种方法。本文指出了交流中的误区,这些误区是由于对偶然观察到的行为的过度概括以及刻板印象、种族中心主义和归因等心理机制造成的。设计/方法/途径跨文化交际培训或信息技术课程通常会过度概括偶然观察到的行为,并对 "我们 "和 "他人 "之间的广泛差异进行归因。研究限制/启示一份离职问卷和任务结束后的访谈显示了培训的积极效果,但还需要进行更系统的评估研究。实际意义跨文化交际(3C)培训主要涉及他人与 "我们 "之间的差异。如果采用一种强调世界各地的人有多少相似之处,以及所感知到的差异也可能存在于观察者的眼中的方法,就可能获得更好的理解。社会影响相互理解对于积极互动至关重要。这里所采用的 3C 培训方法解释了世界各地的人类有多少相似之处,并将明显的差异纳入视野。原创性/价值该培训模块以现有知识为基础,尤其是跨文化心理学知识。除了一份证明民族中心主义的调查问卷外,几乎没有新的信息。不过,这种方法以一种对 3C 培训领域来说相当新颖的方式安排了现有的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信