Probabilistically Extended Ontologies: A Basis for Systematic Testing of ML-Based Systems

H. Wiesbrock, Jürgen Grossmann
{"title":"Probabilistically Extended Ontologies: A Basis for Systematic Testing of ML-Based Systems","authors":"H. Wiesbrock, Jürgen Grossmann","doi":"10.4271/2024-01-3002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typically, machine learning techniques are used to realise autonomous driving. Be it as part of environment recognition or ultimately when making driving decisions. Machine learning generally involves the use of stochastic methods to provide statistical inference. Failures and wrong decisions are unavoidable due to the statistical nature of machine learning and are often directly related to root causes that cannot be easily eliminated. The quality of these systems is normally indicated by statistical indicators such as accuracy and precision. Providing evidence that accuracy and precision of these systems are sufficient to guarantee a safe operation is key for the acceptance of autonomous driving. Usually, tests and simulations are extensively used to provide this kind of evidence.However, the basis of all descriptive statistics is a random selection from a probability space. A major challenge in testing or constructing the training and test data set is that this probability space is usually not well defined. To systematically address this shortcoming, ontologies have been and are being developed to capture the various concepts and properties of the operational design domain. They serve as a basis for the specification of appropriate tests in different approaches. However, in order to make statistical statements about the system, information about the realistic frequency of the inferred test cases is still missing. Related to this problem is the proof of completeness and balance of the training data. While an ontology may be able to check the completeness of the training data, it lacks any information to prove its representativeness. In this article, we propose the extension of ontologies to include probabilistic information. This allows to evaluate the completeness and balance of training sets. Moreover, it serves as a basis for a random sampling of test cases, which allows mathematically sound statistical proofs of the quality of the ML system. We demonstrate our approach by extending published ontologies that capture typical scenarios of autonomous driving systems with probabilistic information.","PeriodicalId":510086,"journal":{"name":"SAE Technical Paper Series","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE Technical Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-3002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Typically, machine learning techniques are used to realise autonomous driving. Be it as part of environment recognition or ultimately when making driving decisions. Machine learning generally involves the use of stochastic methods to provide statistical inference. Failures and wrong decisions are unavoidable due to the statistical nature of machine learning and are often directly related to root causes that cannot be easily eliminated. The quality of these systems is normally indicated by statistical indicators such as accuracy and precision. Providing evidence that accuracy and precision of these systems are sufficient to guarantee a safe operation is key for the acceptance of autonomous driving. Usually, tests and simulations are extensively used to provide this kind of evidence.However, the basis of all descriptive statistics is a random selection from a probability space. A major challenge in testing or constructing the training and test data set is that this probability space is usually not well defined. To systematically address this shortcoming, ontologies have been and are being developed to capture the various concepts and properties of the operational design domain. They serve as a basis for the specification of appropriate tests in different approaches. However, in order to make statistical statements about the system, information about the realistic frequency of the inferred test cases is still missing. Related to this problem is the proof of completeness and balance of the training data. While an ontology may be able to check the completeness of the training data, it lacks any information to prove its representativeness. In this article, we propose the extension of ontologies to include probabilistic information. This allows to evaluate the completeness and balance of training sets. Moreover, it serves as a basis for a random sampling of test cases, which allows mathematically sound statistical proofs of the quality of the ML system. We demonstrate our approach by extending published ontologies that capture typical scenarios of autonomous driving systems with probabilistic information.
概率扩展本体论:对基于 ML 的系统进行系统测试的基础
机器学习技术通常用于实现自动驾驶。无论是作为环境识别的一部分,还是最终在做出驾驶决策时。机器学习通常涉及使用随机方法来提供统计推断。由于机器学习的统计性质,故障和错误决策是不可避免的,而且往往与不易消除的根本原因直接相关。这些系统的质量通常由准确度和精确度等统计指标来表示。提供证据证明这些系统的准确度和精确度足以保证安全运行,是自动驾驶获得认可的关键。然而,所有描述性统计的基础都是从概率空间中随机选择。测试或构建训练和测试数据集的一个主要挑战是,这个概率空间通常没有很好的定义。为了系统地解决这一缺陷,人们已经并正在开发本体,以捕捉运行设计领域的各种概念和属性。本体论可作为在不同方法中指定适当测试的基础。然而,为了对系统进行统计说明,仍然缺少有关推断测试用例现实频率的信息。与这个问题相关的是证明训练数据的完整性和平衡性。虽然本体可以检查训练数据的完整性,但却缺乏任何信息来证明其代表性。在本文中,我们建议对本体进行扩展,使其包含概率信息。这样就可以评估训练集的完整性和平衡性。此外,它还是测试用例随机抽样的基础,可以从数学上证明人工智能系统的质量。我们通过扩展已发布的本体来展示我们的方法,这些本体用概率信息捕捉了自动驾驶系统的典型场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信