Status of Handover Practice of Postoperative Patient from Operating Room to Postanaesthesia Care Unit in Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute Operating Theatre Recovery Room

DR.H. Mgaya, D. P. Mwasapi, Dr. H.J. Mathew, Dr. Edwin M Muhondezi, D. R. T. Mliwa, Dr. Abubakar R Hamis, Dr Peter Kibunto, D. E. Lugazia
{"title":"Status of Handover Practice of Postoperative Patient from Operating Room to Postanaesthesia Care Unit in Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute Operating Theatre Recovery Room","authors":"DR.H. Mgaya, D. P. Mwasapi, Dr. H.J. Mathew, Dr. Edwin M Muhondezi, D. R. T. Mliwa, Dr. Abubakar R Hamis, Dr Peter Kibunto, D. E. Lugazia","doi":"10.36349/easjacc.2024.v06i04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative period is a time of significant physiological flux, patient recover from the acute derangements resulting from anaesthesia and surgery. On arrival at PACU, the patient is re-evaluated by the anaesthesia provider gives a handover to the responsible PAC provider. Incomplete handover increase risk of morbidity and mortality to patients. Objective: Study assessed the handover practice of postoperative patient from operating room to post-anaesthesia care unit in Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute operating theatre recovery room. Methodology: This was a hospital based cross-sectional observational study which was conducted at Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute Hospital located at Upanga. Handover conducted by Anaesthetic Provider to PACU nurse in the Recovery rooms were Observed and information communicated were marked using SBAR handover checklist. Then anaesthetic providers and PACU nurse were surveyed to know which item in the checklist was relevant to be communicated during handover. Data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS version 23). Results: 319 PACU handover were observed. 17.5% of the handover were completed and rated as Good, 50.8% were satisfactory and 31.7% poorly completed. Most communicated items were Vital Sign 90.6%, Operation Underwent 86.8% and Type of anaesthesia 85.9% and the least was ASA 24.5%. Items providers thought should be communicated were Name of the patient (0.954), Age and Gender (0.938), Type of Anaesthesia (0.925). Among the Anaesthetic Provider Cadre Physician Providers provided Good and Satisfactory handover compared to Nurse Provider. Conclusion: Majority of the handover were satisfactorily completed, with Vital Sign, type of anaesthesia and Operation underwent being the most communicated items in checklist.","PeriodicalId":347630,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjacc.2024.v06i04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative period is a time of significant physiological flux, patient recover from the acute derangements resulting from anaesthesia and surgery. On arrival at PACU, the patient is re-evaluated by the anaesthesia provider gives a handover to the responsible PAC provider. Incomplete handover increase risk of morbidity and mortality to patients. Objective: Study assessed the handover practice of postoperative patient from operating room to post-anaesthesia care unit in Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute operating theatre recovery room. Methodology: This was a hospital based cross-sectional observational study which was conducted at Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute Hospital located at Upanga. Handover conducted by Anaesthetic Provider to PACU nurse in the Recovery rooms were Observed and information communicated were marked using SBAR handover checklist. Then anaesthetic providers and PACU nurse were surveyed to know which item in the checklist was relevant to be communicated during handover. Data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS version 23). Results: 319 PACU handover were observed. 17.5% of the handover were completed and rated as Good, 50.8% were satisfactory and 31.7% poorly completed. Most communicated items were Vital Sign 90.6%, Operation Underwent 86.8% and Type of anaesthesia 85.9% and the least was ASA 24.5%. Items providers thought should be communicated were Name of the patient (0.954), Age and Gender (0.938), Type of Anaesthesia (0.925). Among the Anaesthetic Provider Cadre Physician Providers provided Good and Satisfactory handover compared to Nurse Provider. Conclusion: Majority of the handover were satisfactorily completed, with Vital Sign, type of anaesthesia and Operation underwent being the most communicated items in checklist.
Muhimbili 骨科研究所手术室恢复室术后患者从手术室到麻醉后护理室的交接做法现状
背景:术后是病人从麻醉和手术导致的急性失调中恢复过来的重要生理变化时期。到达 PACU 后,麻醉科医生会对病人进行重新评估,并与负责 PAC 的医生进行交接。不完整的交接会增加患者发病和死亡的风险。研究目的研究评估了 Muhimbili 骨科研究所手术室恢复室术后患者从手术室到麻醉后护理病房的交接做法。研究方法这是一项基于医院的横断面观察研究,在位于乌潘加的 Muhimbili 骨科研究所医院进行。研究人员观察了麻醉师与 PACU 护士在恢复室进行的交接,并使用 SBAR 交接清单对所传达的信息进行了标记。然后,对麻醉师和 PACU 护士进行调查,以了解在交接过程中,检查表中哪些项目与沟通相关。收集到的数据使用社会科学家统计软件包(SPSS 23 版)进行分析。结果共观察到 319 次 PACU 交接。17.5%的交接工作完成并被评为 "良好",50.8%的交接工作令人满意,31.7%的交接工作完成不佳。交接最多的项目是生命体征 90.6%、手术 86.8%、麻醉类型 85.9%,最少的是 ASA 24.5%。提供者认为应该告知的项目有病人姓名(0.954)、年龄和性别(0.938)、麻醉类型(0.925)。与护士相比,麻醉提供者队伍中的医生提供了良好和满意的交接。结论:大多数交接工作完成得令人满意,生命体征、麻醉类型和手术是核对表中沟通最多的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信