Enabling Uncertainty Quantification in a standard Full Waveform Inversion method using Normalizing Flows

GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1190/geo2023-0755.1
Changxiao Sun, Alison Malcolm, Rajiv Kumar, Weijian Mao
{"title":"Enabling Uncertainty Quantification in a standard Full Waveform Inversion method using Normalizing Flows","authors":"Changxiao Sun, Alison Malcolm, Rajiv Kumar, Weijian Mao","doi":"10.1190/geo2023-0755.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to maximize the utility of seismic imaging and inversion results, we need to compute not only a final image but also quantify the uncertainty in that image. While the most thorough approach to quantify the uncertainty is to use a method such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which systematically samples the entire posterior distribution, this is often inefficient and not all applications require a full representation of the posterior. We use normalizing flows (NF), a machine learning technique to perform uncertainty quantification (UQ) in full waveform inversion (FWI), specifically for time-lapse data. As with any machine learning algorithm, the NF learns only the mapping from the part of the prior spanned by the training data to the distribution of final models spanned by the training data. Here we make use of this property to perform UQ efficiently by learning a mapping from the prior to the distribution that really characterizes the model perturbations within a specific range. Our approach involves using a range of starting models, paired with final models from a standard FWI as training data. While this does not capture the full posterior of the FWI problem, it enables us to quantify the uncertainties associated with updating from an initial to a final model. Since our target is to perform UQ for time-lapse imaging, we use a local wave-equation solver that allows us to solve the wave equation in a small subset of our entire model, thereby keeping computational costs low. Numerical examples demonstrate that incorporating the training step for NF provides a distribution of model perturbations, which is dependent on a designated prior, to quantify the uncertainty of FWI results.","PeriodicalId":509604,"journal":{"name":"GEOPHYSICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0755.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to maximize the utility of seismic imaging and inversion results, we need to compute not only a final image but also quantify the uncertainty in that image. While the most thorough approach to quantify the uncertainty is to use a method such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which systematically samples the entire posterior distribution, this is often inefficient and not all applications require a full representation of the posterior. We use normalizing flows (NF), a machine learning technique to perform uncertainty quantification (UQ) in full waveform inversion (FWI), specifically for time-lapse data. As with any machine learning algorithm, the NF learns only the mapping from the part of the prior spanned by the training data to the distribution of final models spanned by the training data. Here we make use of this property to perform UQ efficiently by learning a mapping from the prior to the distribution that really characterizes the model perturbations within a specific range. Our approach involves using a range of starting models, paired with final models from a standard FWI as training data. While this does not capture the full posterior of the FWI problem, it enables us to quantify the uncertainties associated with updating from an initial to a final model. Since our target is to perform UQ for time-lapse imaging, we use a local wave-equation solver that allows us to solve the wave equation in a small subset of our entire model, thereby keeping computational costs low. Numerical examples demonstrate that incorporating the training step for NF provides a distribution of model perturbations, which is dependent on a designated prior, to quantify the uncertainty of FWI results.
利用归一化流量在标准全波形反演方法中实现不确定性量化
为了最大限度地利用地震成像和反演结果,我们不仅需要计算最终图像,还需要量化该图像的不确定性。量化不确定性最彻底的方法是使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)等方法,系统地对整个后验分布进行采样,但这种方法往往效率低下,而且并非所有应用都需要后验的完整表示。我们使用归一化流(NF)这一机器学习技术在全波形反演(FWI)中执行不确定性量化(UQ),特别是针对延时数据。与任何机器学习算法一样,归一化流仅学习从训练数据所跨先验部分到训练数据所跨最终模型分布的映射。在这里,我们利用这一特性,通过学习从先验到分布的映射,在特定范围内真正描述模型扰动的特征,从而高效地执行 UQ。我们的方法包括使用一系列起始模型,并搭配标准 FWI 的最终模型作为训练数据。虽然这并不能捕捉到 FWI 问题的全部后验,但它使我们能够量化与从初始模型更新到最终模型相关的不确定性。由于我们的目标是在延时成像中执行 UQ,因此我们使用了局部波方程求解器,它允许我们在整个模型的一小部分中求解波方程,从而降低了计算成本。数值示例表明,结合 NF 的训练步骤可提供模型扰动的分布(取决于指定的先验值),从而量化 FWI 结果的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信