Tracheal Stenosis After Intubation and Tracheostomy in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Case-Control Study

Roya Dokoohaki, Malihe Ebrahimzadeh, N. Sharifi
{"title":"Tracheal Stenosis After Intubation and Tracheostomy in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Roya Dokoohaki, Malihe Ebrahimzadeh, N. Sharifi","doi":"10.5812/semj-145763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most dangerous complications after endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy is tracheal stenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the personal and clinical characteristics of tracheal stenosis following intubation or tracheostomy in intensive care unit patients. Methods: This is a nested case-control study. Thirty-five patients who suffered from tracheal stenosis from March 2016 to March 2021 and had been intubated and tracheostomized in intensive care units (ICU) were selected for the case group. The control group included 105 patients intubated and tracheostomized in ICU during the same period without tracheal stenosis. A demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire was used to collect data from the patients' medical records. Results: The mean length of intubation (P < 0.001), endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure (P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P = 0.043), intubation history (P = 0.045), and airway management (P < 0.001) showed significant differences between the case and control groups. The logistic regression model revealed that COPD (OR = 8.519, P = 0.037), intubation history (OR = 3.939, P = 0.013), length of intubation (OR = 1.118, P = 0.003), age (OR = 0.960, P = 0.030), and endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure (OR = 1.988, P < 0.001) were associated with tracheal stenosis. The time interval between intubation/tracheostomy ranged from approximately 28 to 938 days. Conclusions: Given the impact of certain care practices during hospitalization on the occurrence of tracheal stenosis, such as the mean length of intubation, endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure, and airway management, it is recommended that standardized training on these interventions be prioritized for staff in intensive care departments. Additionally, attention must be given to specific patient characteristics, such as age, COPD, and history of intubation.","PeriodicalId":507014,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","volume":"62 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-145763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most dangerous complications after endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy is tracheal stenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the personal and clinical characteristics of tracheal stenosis following intubation or tracheostomy in intensive care unit patients. Methods: This is a nested case-control study. Thirty-five patients who suffered from tracheal stenosis from March 2016 to March 2021 and had been intubated and tracheostomized in intensive care units (ICU) were selected for the case group. The control group included 105 patients intubated and tracheostomized in ICU during the same period without tracheal stenosis. A demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire was used to collect data from the patients' medical records. Results: The mean length of intubation (P < 0.001), endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure (P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P = 0.043), intubation history (P = 0.045), and airway management (P < 0.001) showed significant differences between the case and control groups. The logistic regression model revealed that COPD (OR = 8.519, P = 0.037), intubation history (OR = 3.939, P = 0.013), length of intubation (OR = 1.118, P = 0.003), age (OR = 0.960, P = 0.030), and endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure (OR = 1.988, P < 0.001) were associated with tracheal stenosis. The time interval between intubation/tracheostomy ranged from approximately 28 to 938 days. Conclusions: Given the impact of certain care practices during hospitalization on the occurrence of tracheal stenosis, such as the mean length of intubation, endotracheal and tracheostomy tube cuff pressure, and airway management, it is recommended that standardized training on these interventions be prioritized for staff in intensive care departments. Additionally, attention must be given to specific patient characteristics, such as age, COPD, and history of intubation.
重症监护病房患者插管和气管切开术后气管狭窄:病例对照研究
背景:气管插管或气管切开术后最危险的并发症之一是气管狭窄:气管插管或气管切开术后最危险的并发症之一是气管狭窄。研究目的本研究旨在确定重症监护室患者插管或气管切开术后气管狭窄的个人和临床特征。方法:这是一项巢式病例对照研究:这是一项巢式病例对照研究。病例组选取了 35 名在 2016 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月期间患有气管狭窄并在重症监护病房(ICU)进行过插管和气管切开术的患者。对照组包括同期在重症监护室插管和气管插管的 105 名无气管狭窄的患者。研究人员使用人口统计学和临床特征问卷从患者病历中收集数据。结果病例组和对照组的平均插管时间(P < 0.001)、气管插管和气管造口管袖带压力(P < 0.001)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(P = 0.043)、插管史(P = 0.045)和气道管理(P < 0.001)均有显著差异。逻辑回归模型显示,慢性阻塞性肺病(OR = 8.519,P = 0.037)、插管史(OR = 3.939,P = 0.013)、插管时间(OR = 1.118,P = 0.003)、年龄(OR = 0.960,P = 0.030)、气管插管和气管切开管袖带压力(OR = 1.988,P < 0.001)与气管狭窄有关。插管/气管切开术之间的时间间隔从大约 28 天到 938 天不等。结论:鉴于住院期间的某些护理措施会对气管狭窄的发生产生影响,如插管的平均时间、气管插管和气管造口管袖带压力以及气道管理,因此建议优先对重症监护部门的工作人员进行有关这些干预措施的标准化培训。此外,还必须关注特定患者的特征,如年龄、慢性阻塞性肺病和插管史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信