Numerical Study of Optimal Combustion in Tangentially Fired Coal Boiler 625 MW by Considering Rear Pass Temperature

Alam Tri Yudha, Arif Wahjudi
{"title":"Numerical Study of Optimal Combustion in Tangentially Fired Coal Boiler 625 MW by Considering Rear Pass Temperature","authors":"Alam Tri Yudha, Arif Wahjudi","doi":"10.18502/kss.v9i19.16475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tangentially fired boilers have a burner system within a single actuator group and a SOFA system that controls the fuel and air distribution to generate boiler combustion in the furnace. The goal of this study was to determine optimal combustion by statistically examining the effect of changes in the burner and SOFA angles on the response of rear pass boiler temperature and NOx concentration in tangentially burned boilers. (1) Tilting burner angles of +30⁰, +15⁰, 0⁰, –15⁰, and –30⁰, and (2) SOFA tilting and yawing angles of –15⁰, –8⁰, 0⁰, +8⁰, +15⁰ were used in this study. The GA (Genetic Algorithm) approach and CFD software were utilized to optimize the rear pass temperature and NOx content response. The simulation results data were then examined using ANOVA, and it was discovered that tilting burner and tilting SOFA have a substantial effect on response, however, yaw SOFA does not. In this scenario, the resulting angle variations for tilting burner, SOFA-tilt, and SOFA-yaw are +11⁰, –15⁰, and 2⁰, respectively. The optimal angle adjustments result in rear pass temperatures of 821.33 ⁰K and 816.27 ⁰K, with a slight fluctuation of 5.06 ⁰K. This was in contrast to the preceding conditions, when the rear pass temperatures of sides A and B were 781.32 ⁰K and 767.83 ⁰K, respectively, resulting in a 13.49 ⁰K difference. \nKeywords: tilting burner, tilting and yawing SOFA, rear pass temperature, NOx, GA and CFD method","PeriodicalId":17820,"journal":{"name":"KnE Social Sciences","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KnE Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i19.16475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tangentially fired boilers have a burner system within a single actuator group and a SOFA system that controls the fuel and air distribution to generate boiler combustion in the furnace. The goal of this study was to determine optimal combustion by statistically examining the effect of changes in the burner and SOFA angles on the response of rear pass boiler temperature and NOx concentration in tangentially burned boilers. (1) Tilting burner angles of +30⁰, +15⁰, 0⁰, –15⁰, and –30⁰, and (2) SOFA tilting and yawing angles of –15⁰, –8⁰, 0⁰, +8⁰, +15⁰ were used in this study. The GA (Genetic Algorithm) approach and CFD software were utilized to optimize the rear pass temperature and NOx content response. The simulation results data were then examined using ANOVA, and it was discovered that tilting burner and tilting SOFA have a substantial effect on response, however, yaw SOFA does not. In this scenario, the resulting angle variations for tilting burner, SOFA-tilt, and SOFA-yaw are +11⁰, –15⁰, and 2⁰, respectively. The optimal angle adjustments result in rear pass temperatures of 821.33 ⁰K and 816.27 ⁰K, with a slight fluctuation of 5.06 ⁰K. This was in contrast to the preceding conditions, when the rear pass temperatures of sides A and B were 781.32 ⁰K and 767.83 ⁰K, respectively, resulting in a 13.49 ⁰K difference. Keywords: tilting burner, tilting and yawing SOFA, rear pass temperature, NOx, GA and CFD method
考虑后部通道温度的 625 兆瓦切向燃煤锅炉最佳燃烧数值研究
切向燃烧锅炉在单个执行器组内有一个燃烧器系统和一个 SOFA 系统,后者控制燃料和空气的分配,以产生炉内的锅炉燃烧。本研究的目的是通过统计分析燃烧器和 SOFA 角度的变化对切向燃烧锅炉后段锅炉温度和氮氧化物浓度响应的影响,确定最佳燃烧方式。(1) 燃烧器倾斜角为 +30⁰、+15⁰、0⁰、-15⁰ 和 -30⁰;(2) SOFA 倾斜角和偏航角为 -15⁰、-8⁰、0⁰、+8⁰ 和 +15⁰。利用遗传算法(GA)方法和 CFD 软件优化了后部通道温度和氮氧化物含量响应。然后使用方差分析对模拟结果数据进行检验,发现倾斜燃烧器和倾斜 SOFA 对响应有很大影响,但偏航 SOFA 则没有影响。在这种情况下,倾斜燃烧器、倾斜 SOFA 和偏航 SOFA 产生的角度变化分别为 +11⁰、-15⁰ 和 2⁰。最佳角度调整后,后部通道温度分别为 821.33 ⁰K 和 816.27 ⁰K,轻微波动为 5.06 ⁰K。这与之前的条件形成鲜明对比,当时 A 侧和 B 侧的后部通道温度分别为 781.32 ⁰K 和 767.83 ⁰K ,两者相差 13.49 ⁰K。关键词:倾斜燃烧器、倾斜和偏航 SOFA、后部通道温度、氮氧化物、GA 和 CFD 方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信