The effect of 10-week wholebody calisthenics training program on the muscular endurance of untrained collegiate students

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Ramon Carlo E. Masagca
{"title":"The effect of 10-week wholebody calisthenics training program on the muscular endurance of untrained collegiate students","authors":"Ramon Carlo E. Masagca","doi":"10.55860/c9byhd85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to investigate the effects of calisthenics exercise on muscular endurance by implementing a 10-week whole-body calisthenic training program on 183 randomly selected untrained collegiate students (108 females, 75 males). A two-group pretest-posttest design was employed (CG = 88; EG = 95), accompanied by three muscular endurance field tests to thoroughly observe the probable effects of the training program on this fitness component. The pretest involved administering fitness tests, followed by the 10-week training program for the EG. The CG was instructed to engage in one hour of preferred physical activity three times a week for 10 weeks. Post-testing was completed by administering the same fitness tests. The normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For intragroup comparison, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, while for intergroup comparison, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed. Among females in the CG, the One Minute Push-up Test showed a significant improvement from a mean of 10.80 (±7.18) to 13.97 (±7.53) (p < .00001*), while the PT increased from 68.83 (±37.80) to 78.79 (±41.50) (p = .00036*), and the Wall Sit scores rose from 48.90 (±27.04) to 65.59 (±31.86) (p < .00001*). In males, the Wall Sit demonstrated a significant improvement from 58.15 (±26.47) to 83.88 (±50.28) (p = .00022*). Conversely, the EG exhibited significant improvements in all three tests for both females and males. Inter-group comparisons revealed the EG's significantly higher mean scores in the One Minute Push-up Test (24.50 vs. 18.17, p = .00494*), PT(107.87 vs. 79.85, p = .01044* for males), and Wall Sit (112.34 vs. 83.88, p = .01255*). Both female and male participants in the EG showed significant improvements in the One Minute Push-up Test, Planking Test, and Wall Sit compared to the CG, with consistently higher mean scores across all tests.","PeriodicalId":51651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55860/c9byhd85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of calisthenics exercise on muscular endurance by implementing a 10-week whole-body calisthenic training program on 183 randomly selected untrained collegiate students (108 females, 75 males). A two-group pretest-posttest design was employed (CG = 88; EG = 95), accompanied by three muscular endurance field tests to thoroughly observe the probable effects of the training program on this fitness component. The pretest involved administering fitness tests, followed by the 10-week training program for the EG. The CG was instructed to engage in one hour of preferred physical activity three times a week for 10 weeks. Post-testing was completed by administering the same fitness tests. The normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For intragroup comparison, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, while for intergroup comparison, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed. Among females in the CG, the One Minute Push-up Test showed a significant improvement from a mean of 10.80 (±7.18) to 13.97 (±7.53) (p < .00001*), while the PT increased from 68.83 (±37.80) to 78.79 (±41.50) (p = .00036*), and the Wall Sit scores rose from 48.90 (±27.04) to 65.59 (±31.86) (p < .00001*). In males, the Wall Sit demonstrated a significant improvement from 58.15 (±26.47) to 83.88 (±50.28) (p = .00022*). Conversely, the EG exhibited significant improvements in all three tests for both females and males. Inter-group comparisons revealed the EG's significantly higher mean scores in the One Minute Push-up Test (24.50 vs. 18.17, p = .00494*), PT(107.87 vs. 79.85, p = .01044* for males), and Wall Sit (112.34 vs. 83.88, p = .01255*). Both female and male participants in the EG showed significant improvements in the One Minute Push-up Test, Planking Test, and Wall Sit compared to the CG, with consistently higher mean scores across all tests.
为期 10 周的全身健美操训练对未经训练的大学生肌肉耐力的影响
本研究旨在通过对 183 名随机选取的未受过训练的大学生(108 名女性,75 名男性)实施为期 10 周的全身肌力训练计划,研究肌力训练对肌肉耐力的影响。采用了两组前测-后测设计(CG = 88;EG = 95),并进行了三次肌肉耐力现场测试,以全面观察训练计划对这一体能组成部分可能产生的影响。前测包括进行体能测试,然后对 EG 进行为期 10 周的训练。指导 CG 在 10 周内每周三次参加一小时的首选体育活动。后测通过进行相同的体能测试完成。数据的正态性通过 Shapiro-Wilk 检验进行评估。组内比较采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,组间比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验。在 CG 组的女性中,一分钟俯卧撑测试的平均成绩从 10.80 (±7.18) 显著提高到 13.97 (±7.53) (p < .00001*),PT 从 68.83 (±37.80) 提高到 78.79 (±41.50) (p = .00036*) ,壁坐的成绩从 48.90 (±27.04) 提高到 65.59 (±31.86) (p < .00001*)。男性的 "壁坐 "得分从 58.15(±26.47)分显著提高到 83.88(±50.28)分(p = .00022*)。相反,在所有三项测试中,女性和男性的 EG 都有显著提高。组间比较显示,EG 在一分钟俯卧撑测试(24.50 vs. 18.17,p = .00494*)、PT(107.87 vs. 79.85,男性 p = .01044*)和壁坐(112.34 vs. 83.88,p = .01255*)中的平均得分明显更高。与 CG 相比,EG 的女性和男性参与者在一分钟俯卧撑测试、平板支撑测试和壁坐测试中均有显著提高,且在所有测试中的平均得分都更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: JHSE contributes to the continuing professional development of sport and exercise sciences, including a high-level research in biomechanics, exercise physiology, sports history, nutrition, and a wide range of social and ethical issues in physical activity, and other aspects of sports medicine related quality of life and biophysical investigation of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信