Diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on changes in peripheral nerves according to ultrasonic research method

Zoya V. Karaseva, A. S. Ametov, Victoria G. Saltykova, E. Pashkova, Larisa V. Kuznetsova, Ksenia G. Yudina
{"title":"Diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on changes in peripheral nerves according to ultrasonic research method","authors":"Zoya V. Karaseva, A. S. Ametov, Victoria G. Saltykova, E. Pashkova, Larisa V. Kuznetsova, Ksenia G. Yudina","doi":"10.17816/dd626159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Diabetic polyneuropathy remains a significant and urgent problem in the context of diabetes mellitus, affecting more than a quarter of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. \nCurrently, the method of peripheral nerve examination using ultrasound is gaining worldwide popularity. In the Russian Federation, however, it remains widely used only in some medical institutions. \nThe ultrasound method employs the indicator “nerve cross-sectional area” to diagnose this complication, exhibiting a high degree of sensitivity (93%) in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging data (67%). Foreign and Russian studies [3, 4] confirm the observed increase in the cross-sectional area of the nerve in patients with diabetes mellitus. \nAIM: The study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the ultrasound method of peripheral nerve examination in the detection of diabetic polyneuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The Philips Epiq 7 ultrasonic diagnostic device (USA) with a linear transducer, operating at a frequency of 4–18 MHz, was used. The comparison group consisted of 30 volunteers. The main group comprised 25 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and confirmed diabetic polyneuropathy, as determined by electroneuromyography and physical examination methods. \nThe median cross-sectional area of the sciatic and common peroneal nerves in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers was calculated. The criterion for a difference in area values was calculated using the Mann-Whitney test. \nRESULTS: The cross-sectional area thresholds were determined based on the 95th percentile of a cohort of healthy volunteers. \nIn patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the following median nerve cross-sectional area values were found: for the sciatic nerve, 0.579 cm2 (at the gluteal crease) and 0.553 cm2 (2 cm proximal to the bifurcation); for the common peroneal nerve, 0.11 cm2 (1 cm distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve) and 0.08 cm2 (at the level of the head of the fibula). In healthy volunteers, the values were as follows: for the sciatic nerve, 0.46 cm2 (at the gluteal crease) and 0.37 cm2 (2 cm proximal to the bifurcation); for the common peroneal nerve, 0.08 cm2 (1 cm distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve) and 0.06 cm2 (at the level of the head of the fibula). \nA significant difference was found between the control and target groups using the Mann-Whitney test (p 0.01). \nCONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic polyneuropathy, a significant increase in the cross-sectional area of the nerves of the lower extremities (sciatic and peroneal nerves) was revealed, which allows for the use of ultrasound as an additional method for the instrumental diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy. However, due to the small sample size, further study is required to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":34831,"journal":{"name":"Digital Diagnostics","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd626159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic polyneuropathy remains a significant and urgent problem in the context of diabetes mellitus, affecting more than a quarter of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Currently, the method of peripheral nerve examination using ultrasound is gaining worldwide popularity. In the Russian Federation, however, it remains widely used only in some medical institutions. The ultrasound method employs the indicator “nerve cross-sectional area” to diagnose this complication, exhibiting a high degree of sensitivity (93%) in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging data (67%). Foreign and Russian studies [3, 4] confirm the observed increase in the cross-sectional area of the nerve in patients with diabetes mellitus. AIM: The study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the ultrasound method of peripheral nerve examination in the detection of diabetic polyneuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Philips Epiq 7 ultrasonic diagnostic device (USA) with a linear transducer, operating at a frequency of 4–18 MHz, was used. The comparison group consisted of 30 volunteers. The main group comprised 25 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and confirmed diabetic polyneuropathy, as determined by electroneuromyography and physical examination methods. The median cross-sectional area of the sciatic and common peroneal nerves in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers was calculated. The criterion for a difference in area values was calculated using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area thresholds were determined based on the 95th percentile of a cohort of healthy volunteers. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the following median nerve cross-sectional area values were found: for the sciatic nerve, 0.579 cm2 (at the gluteal crease) and 0.553 cm2 (2 cm proximal to the bifurcation); for the common peroneal nerve, 0.11 cm2 (1 cm distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve) and 0.08 cm2 (at the level of the head of the fibula). In healthy volunteers, the values were as follows: for the sciatic nerve, 0.46 cm2 (at the gluteal crease) and 0.37 cm2 (2 cm proximal to the bifurcation); for the common peroneal nerve, 0.08 cm2 (1 cm distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve) and 0.06 cm2 (at the level of the head of the fibula). A significant difference was found between the control and target groups using the Mann-Whitney test (p 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic polyneuropathy, a significant increase in the cross-sectional area of the nerves of the lower extremities (sciatic and peroneal nerves) was revealed, which allows for the use of ultrasound as an additional method for the instrumental diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy. However, due to the small sample size, further study is required to confirm these findings.
2 型糖尿病多发性神经病变的诊断:根据超声波研究方法关注周围神经的变化
背景:糖尿病多发性神经病变仍然是糖尿病的一个重要而紧迫的问题,超过四分之一的 2 型糖尿病患者会受到影响。目前,使用超声波进行周围神经检查的方法在全世界越来越受欢迎。但在俄罗斯联邦,这种方法仍只在一些医疗机构广泛使用。超声波方法采用 "神经横截面积 "指标来诊断这种并发症,与磁共振成像数据(67%)相比,具有很高的灵敏度(93%)。国外和俄罗斯的研究[3, 4]证实,糖尿病患者的神经横截面积有所增加。目的:本研究旨在评估超声周围神经检查法在检测 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病多发性神经病变方面的诊断价值。材料与方法:使用飞利浦 Epiq 7 超声波诊断仪(美国),其线性换能器的工作频率为 4-18 兆赫。对比组由 30 名志愿者组成。主研究组由 25 名 2 型糖尿病患者组成,并通过电神经肌电图和体格检查方法确诊为糖尿病多发性神经病变。计算了 2 型糖尿病患者和健康志愿者坐骨神经和腓总神经的中位横截面积。使用曼-惠特尼检验计算面积值差异的标准。结果:横截面积阈值是根据健康志愿者队列的第 95 百分位数确定的。2 型糖尿病患者的正中神经横截面积值如下:坐骨神经为 0.579 平方厘米(臀部皱襞处)和 0.553 平方厘米(分叉处近端 2 厘米处);腓总神经为 0.11 平方厘米(坐骨神经分叉处远端 1 厘米处)和 0.08 平方厘米(腓骨头水平处)。健康志愿者的数值如下:坐骨神经 0.46 cm2(臀部皱襞处)和 0.37 cm2(分叉处近端 2 cm);腓总神经 0.08 cm2(坐骨神经分叉处远端 1 cm)和 0.06 cm2(腓骨头水平)。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验发现,对照组和目标组之间存在明显差异(P 0.01)。结论:在 2 型糖尿病合并糖尿病多发性神经病变的患者中,下肢神经(坐骨神经和腓肠神经)的横截面积显著增加,这使得超声波成为糖尿病多发性神经病变器质性诊断的一种补充方法。不过,由于样本量较小,还需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信