Immunohistochemical factors of prognosis of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma: А prospective and retrospective study

Q4 Medicine
Liana V. Oganesyan, L. Zavalishina, N. A. Ognerubov, Iuliia V. Kostalanova, Andrey E. Orlov, I. Poddubnaya
{"title":"Immunohistochemical factors of prognosis of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma: А prospective and retrospective study","authors":"Liana V. Oganesyan, L. Zavalishina, N. A. Ognerubov, Iuliia V. Kostalanova, Andrey E. Orlov, I. Poddubnaya","doi":"10.26442/18151434.2024.2.202803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (IT) is becoming the standard treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors are only effective in a fraction of patients, and studies examining biological markers and their correlation with clinical efficacy are insufficient to draw unambiguous conclusions. \nAim. To improve the outcomes of the first-line therapy for disseminated melanoma based on identifying clinical and immunohistochemical predictors of IT efficacy. \nMaterials and methods. Data from 130 patients who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or prolgolimab) in the first-line therapy for disseminated melanoma between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed. \nResults. Improvement was observed in 24 patients (18.4%): complete response in 18 patients (13.8%), partial response in 6 (4.6%), and stabilization in 71 (54.6%) patients. Progression was reported in 31 (24%) patients. Death occurred in 4 (3%) cases during IT with prolgolimab due to disease progression. The two-year disease-free survival (DFS) during IT was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–67), p=0.63; the median 2-year overall survival was not reached. In the immunohistochemical study, 47 (63.5%) patients had a predominance of tumor infiltration with CD8 lymphocytes over CD4, regardless of the IT type: 2-year DFS 82% (95% CI 70–96) vs 13% (95% CI 2.7–64) in the absence of CD8 predominance over CD4, p=0.0001; the median DFS was not reached in patients with the predominance of CD8 lymphocytes tumor infiltration over CD4 compared to the other group – 7.6 months in the absence of this feature (95% CI 5.8–0), p=0.001. The peritumoral location of the immune lymphoid infiltrate was observed in all 74 (100%) patients, and the intratumoral location was less common (52 patients, 70%). In the presence of both periand intratumoral location of the immune infiltrate, the 2-year DFS was 83% (95% CI 70–98) compared to the group of patients in whom no intratumoral location was detected – 5.5% (95% CI 0.8–36), p0.0001. The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level 10% was observed in 47 (63.5%) patients. With this level of PD-L1 expression, the one-year DFS was 91% (95% CI 83–100) compared to 29% (95% CI 15–57) with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, p0.0001; the median DFS is reached, and in the group 2, DFS was only 6.6 months. In the case of PD-L110%, the 2-year DFS was high at 78% (95% CI 63–100), p0.0001. \nConclusion. Based on the study's results, it can be assumed that immunohistochemical characteristics such as a PD-L1 expression level 10%, the simultaneous presence of periand intratumoral lymphoid tumor infiltration, and the predominance of CD8 over CD4 can be considered predictors of IT efficacy with nivolumab and prolgolimab.","PeriodicalId":16401,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Oncology","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2024.2.202803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (IT) is becoming the standard treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors are only effective in a fraction of patients, and studies examining biological markers and their correlation with clinical efficacy are insufficient to draw unambiguous conclusions. Aim. To improve the outcomes of the first-line therapy for disseminated melanoma based on identifying clinical and immunohistochemical predictors of IT efficacy. Materials and methods. Data from 130 patients who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or prolgolimab) in the first-line therapy for disseminated melanoma between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed. Results. Improvement was observed in 24 patients (18.4%): complete response in 18 patients (13.8%), partial response in 6 (4.6%), and stabilization in 71 (54.6%) patients. Progression was reported in 31 (24%) patients. Death occurred in 4 (3%) cases during IT with prolgolimab due to disease progression. The two-year disease-free survival (DFS) during IT was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–67), p=0.63; the median 2-year overall survival was not reached. In the immunohistochemical study, 47 (63.5%) patients had a predominance of tumor infiltration with CD8 lymphocytes over CD4, regardless of the IT type: 2-year DFS 82% (95% CI 70–96) vs 13% (95% CI 2.7–64) in the absence of CD8 predominance over CD4, p=0.0001; the median DFS was not reached in patients with the predominance of CD8 lymphocytes tumor infiltration over CD4 compared to the other group – 7.6 months in the absence of this feature (95% CI 5.8–0), p=0.001. The peritumoral location of the immune lymphoid infiltrate was observed in all 74 (100%) patients, and the intratumoral location was less common (52 patients, 70%). In the presence of both periand intratumoral location of the immune infiltrate, the 2-year DFS was 83% (95% CI 70–98) compared to the group of patients in whom no intratumoral location was detected – 5.5% (95% CI 0.8–36), p0.0001. The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level 10% was observed in 47 (63.5%) patients. With this level of PD-L1 expression, the one-year DFS was 91% (95% CI 83–100) compared to 29% (95% CI 15–57) with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, p0.0001; the median DFS is reached, and in the group 2, DFS was only 6.6 months. In the case of PD-L110%, the 2-year DFS was high at 78% (95% CI 63–100), p0.0001. Conclusion. Based on the study's results, it can be assumed that immunohistochemical characteristics such as a PD-L1 expression level 10%, the simultaneous presence of periand intratumoral lymphoid tumor infiltration, and the predominance of CD8 over CD4 can be considered predictors of IT efficacy with nivolumab and prolgolimab.
转移性黑色素瘤免疫治疗预后的免疫组化因素:前瞻性和回顾性研究
简介抗PD-1免疫疗法(IT)正成为转移性黑色素瘤患者的标准治疗方法。然而,免疫检查点抑制剂仅对一小部分患者有效,而对生物标记物及其与临床疗效相关性的研究不足以得出明确的结论。我们的目标是在确定 IT 疗效的临床和免疫组化预测指标的基础上,改善播散性黑色素瘤一线疗法的疗效。材料和方法。分析了2017年至2024年间在播散性黑色素瘤一线疗法中接受免疫检查点抑制剂(nivolumab或prolgolimab)治疗的130名患者的数据。结果显示24名患者(18.4%)病情有所好转:18名患者(13.8%)完全应答,6名患者(4.6%)部分应答,71名患者(54.6%)病情稳定。31例(24%)患者的病情有所进展。在使用普罗戈利单抗的 IT 治疗期间,有 4 例(3%)患者因疾病进展而死亡。IT期间的两年无病生存期(DFS)为53%(95%置信区间[CI] 42-67),P=0.63;两年总生存期的中位数未达到。在免疫组化研究中,47 例(63.5%)患者的肿瘤浸润以 CD8 淋巴细胞为主,而非 CD4,与 IT 类型无关:2 年无生存期为 82% (95% CI 70-96) vs 13% (95% CI 2.7-64) ,CD8 淋巴细胞占主导地位而非 CD4,P=0.0001;与其他组相比,CD8淋巴细胞肿瘤浸润比CD4淋巴细胞浸润占优势的患者的中位DFS未达到--无此特征的患者为7.6个月(95% CI 5.8-0),P=0.001。所有74名患者(100%)都观察到了免疫淋巴细胞浸润的瘤周位置,而瘤内位置则较少见(52名患者,70%)。与未发现瘤内免疫淋巴浸润的患者组相比,同时存在瘤周和瘤内免疫淋巴浸润的患者的 2 年 DFS 为 83%(95% CI 70-98),而未发现瘤内免疫淋巴浸润的患者为 5.5%(95% CI 0.8-36),P0.0001。47例(63.5%)患者的程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达水平为10%。在这种PD-L1表达水平下,一年的DFS为91%(95% CI 83-100),而在PD-L1表达水平较低的情况下,一年的DFS为29%(95% CI 15-57),P0.0001;中位DFS达到,而在第2组中,DFS仅为6.6个月。在 PD-L110% 的情况下,2 年 DFS 高达 78%(95% CI 63-100),p0.0001。结论根据研究结果,可以认为免疫组化特征,如PD-L1表达水平达到10%、肿瘤周围和肿瘤内部同时存在淋巴细胞浸润、CD8占优势而CD4占劣势等,是预测尼妥珠单抗和普罗戈利单抗的IT疗效的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Oncology
Journal of Modern Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信