Evaluation of Land Subsidence Susceptibility in Kunming Basin Based on Remote Sensing Interpretation and Convolutional Neural Network

Q3 Engineering
Fa-long Wang, A. Fa-you, Chuan-bing Zhu, Hua Zhang, Rao-sheng He, Rui Wang, Zhang-zhen Liu
{"title":"Evaluation of Land Subsidence Susceptibility in Kunming Basin Based on\nRemote Sensing Interpretation and Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Fa-long Wang, A. Fa-you, Chuan-bing Zhu, Hua Zhang, Rao-sheng He, Rui Wang, Zhang-zhen Liu","doi":"10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aims to utilize the Machine Learning (ML) model to produce highprecision\nmaps of urban ground subsidence susceptibility, providing a scientific basis for disaster\nprevention and mitigation efforts in the Kunming Basin.\n\n\n\nIn this patent study, remote sensing interpretation of Kunming City was conducted using\nSBAS-InSAR technology to acquire subsidence data. Based on the frequency ratio method, ten evaluative\nfactors with strong correlations were selected to establish an evaluation index system for the\nsubsidence susceptibility of the Kunming Basin. Five models, including CNN, Back Propagation\nNeural Network (BPNN), Genetic Algorithm optimized BPNN (GA-BPNN), Particle Swarm Optimization\noptimized BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN),\nwere employed. The frequency ratio method and the ROC curve were used to compare the effectiveness\nand precision of these models.\n\n\n\nThe frequency ratio method indicated that the CNN model had the highest values in the very\nhigh and high susceptibility areas, reaching 4.10, which was the highest among all models; in the\nvery low and low susceptibility areas, its value was 0.34, which was the lowest among the models.\nThe ROC curve demonstrated that the CNN model, based on deep learning (AUC = 0.952), was\nmore precise than the machine learning-based models such as BPNN (AUC = 0.896), RBFNN (AUC\n= 0.917), GA-BPNN (AUC = 0.890), and PSO-BPNN (AUC = 0.906).\n\n\n\nThe CNN model has predicted that 81.06% of the ground subsidence grid cells fall into\nthe very high and high susceptibility categories, demonstrating good predictive performance. According\nto the established evaluation index system for ground subsidence susceptibility, the fundamental\ncauses of ground subsidence in the Kunming Basin are identified as poor soil mechanical\nproperties and low bearing capacity, while construction activities have exacerbated the development\nof ground subsidence.\n","PeriodicalId":40022,"journal":{"name":"Recent Patents on Engineering","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Patents on Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to utilize the Machine Learning (ML) model to produce highprecision maps of urban ground subsidence susceptibility, providing a scientific basis for disaster prevention and mitigation efforts in the Kunming Basin. In this patent study, remote sensing interpretation of Kunming City was conducted using SBAS-InSAR technology to acquire subsidence data. Based on the frequency ratio method, ten evaluative factors with strong correlations were selected to establish an evaluation index system for the subsidence susceptibility of the Kunming Basin. Five models, including CNN, Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Genetic Algorithm optimized BPNN (GA-BPNN), Particle Swarm Optimization optimized BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN), were employed. The frequency ratio method and the ROC curve were used to compare the effectiveness and precision of these models. The frequency ratio method indicated that the CNN model had the highest values in the very high and high susceptibility areas, reaching 4.10, which was the highest among all models; in the very low and low susceptibility areas, its value was 0.34, which was the lowest among the models. The ROC curve demonstrated that the CNN model, based on deep learning (AUC = 0.952), was more precise than the machine learning-based models such as BPNN (AUC = 0.896), RBFNN (AUC = 0.917), GA-BPNN (AUC = 0.890), and PSO-BPNN (AUC = 0.906). The CNN model has predicted that 81.06% of the ground subsidence grid cells fall into the very high and high susceptibility categories, demonstrating good predictive performance. According to the established evaluation index system for ground subsidence susceptibility, the fundamental causes of ground subsidence in the Kunming Basin are identified as poor soil mechanical properties and low bearing capacity, while construction activities have exacerbated the development of ground subsidence.
基于遥感解译和卷积神经网络的昆明盆地土地沉降易感性评价
本研究旨在利用机器学习(ML)模型绘制高精度的城市地面沉降易感性图,为昆明盆地防灾减灾工作提供科学依据。在本专利研究中,利用SBAS-InSAR技术对昆明市进行遥感解译,获取沉降数据。该专利研究利用 SBAS-InSAR 技术获取了昆明市的地表沉降数据,利用频率比方法选取了 10 个相关性较强的评价因子,建立了昆明盆地地表沉降易感性评价指标体系。采用 CNN、反向传播神经网络(Back PropagationNeural Network,BPNN)、遗传算法优化的 BPNN(GA-BPNN)、粒子群优化的 BPNN(Particle Swarm Optimization,PSO-BPNN)和径向基函数神经网络(Radial Basis Function Neural Network,RBFNN)等五种模型对昆明盆地塌陷易感性进行评价。频率比方法表明,CNN 模型在极高和高易感区域的数值最高,达到 4.10,是所有模型中最高的;在极低和低易感区域,其数值为 0.34,是所有模型中最低的。ROC 曲线表明,基于深度学习的 CNN 模型(AUC = 0.952)比基于机器学习的 BPNN(AUC = 0.896)、RBFNN(AUC = 0.917)、GA-BPNN(AUC = 0.CNN 模型预测出 81.06% 的地面沉降网格单元属于极高和高易感类别,显示出良好的预测性能。根据已建立的地面沉降易感性评价指标体系,昆明盆地地面沉降的根本原因是土壤力学性质差、承载力低,而建设活动加剧了地面沉降的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recent Patents on Engineering
Recent Patents on Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Recent Patents on Engineering publishes review articles by experts on recent patents in the major fields of engineering. A selection of important and recent patents on engineering is also included in the journal. The journal is essential reading for all researchers involved in engineering sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信