On the Association of Attitudes Towards NATO and Weapon Deliveries for Ukraine with Vote Intentions in Germany

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
L. C. Wurthmann, Wagner, German Politics, Sarah Wagner, C. L. C. Wurthmann
{"title":"On the Association of Attitudes Towards NATO and Weapon Deliveries for Ukraine with Vote Intentions in Germany","authors":"L. C. Wurthmann, Wagner, German Politics, Sarah Wagner, C. L. C. Wurthmann","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2024.2372562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that foreign policy events can sway voting intentions. While initial analyses have explored Germany’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its foreign policy implications, public perspectives on this matter remain relatively unexplored, despite visible consequences like soaring energy and food prices, and concerns about escalating the war. To address this gap, the article delves into how Germans’ attitudes towards NATO’s role in the Russian invasion and the supply of weapons to Ukraine impact their voting intentions. Drawing on GLES data, our research reveals that rejecting further weapons deliveries significantly increases support for the radical-right AfD. Conversely, endorsement of such deliveries sees increased support for the Greens, FDP, and CDU/CSU. No significant effects are observed for the SPD and the Left Party. Notably, attitudes towards NATO and weapons play a role in the likelihood of supporting a new party associated with former Left Party politician, Sahra Wagenknecht. Crucially, these effects persist even when considering socio-demographic and ideological factors, underscoring the pivotal role of these issues in shaping party competition.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2024.2372562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that foreign policy events can sway voting intentions. While initial analyses have explored Germany’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its foreign policy implications, public perspectives on this matter remain relatively unexplored, despite visible consequences like soaring energy and food prices, and concerns about escalating the war. To address this gap, the article delves into how Germans’ attitudes towards NATO’s role in the Russian invasion and the supply of weapons to Ukraine impact their voting intentions. Drawing on GLES data, our research reveals that rejecting further weapons deliveries significantly increases support for the radical-right AfD. Conversely, endorsement of such deliveries sees increased support for the Greens, FDP, and CDU/CSU. No significant effects are observed for the SPD and the Left Party. Notably, attitudes towards NATO and weapons play a role in the likelihood of supporting a new party associated with former Left Party politician, Sahra Wagenknecht. Crucially, these effects persist even when considering socio-demographic and ideological factors, underscoring the pivotal role of these issues in shaping party competition.
关于德国对北约和向乌克兰运送武器的态度与投票意向的联系
研究表明,外交政策事件可以左右投票意向。虽然已有初步分析探讨了德国对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的反应及其外交政策影响,但公众对此事的看法仍相对欠缺,尽管存在能源和食品价格飙升等显而易见的后果,以及对战争升级的担忧。为了弥补这一不足,文章深入探讨了德国人对北约在俄罗斯入侵中的作用以及向乌克兰提供武器的态度如何影响他们的投票意向。利用 GLES 数据,我们的研究发现,拒绝进一步提供武器会显著增加激进右翼 AfD 的支持率。相反,如果支持进一步提供武器,则绿党、自民党和基民盟/基社盟的支持率会上升。社民党和左翼党没有观察到明显的影响。值得注意的是,对北约和武器的态度对支持与前左翼党政治家萨赫拉-瓦根克内希特(Sahra Wagenknecht)有关联的新政党的可能性产生了影响。重要的是,即使考虑到社会人口和意识形态因素,这些影响仍然存在,这突出表明了这些问题在形成政党竞争中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信