Maternal disability and newborn discharge to social services: a population-based study

Claire Grant, Y. Lunsky, A. Guttmann, Simone Vigod, Isobel Sharpe, K. Fung, Hilary Brown
{"title":"Maternal disability and newborn discharge to social services: a population-based study","authors":"Claire Grant, Y. Lunsky, A. Guttmann, Simone Vigod, Isobel Sharpe, K. Fung, Hilary Brown","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionRemoving a child from their family is the option of last resort for social services. However, decisions to place children into care are occurring more frequently and earlier in children's lives, with newborn discharge to social services being a particular concern due to the effects of mother-newborn separations on child development. Women with disabilities face negative assumptions about their parenting capacity, but little is known about their rates of newborn discharge to social services.\nObjectivesTo examine the risk of discharge to social services among newborns of women with and without disabilities.\nMethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study of singleton livebirths in Ontario, Canada, 2008-2019. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk (RR) of discharge to social services immediately after the birth hospital stay, comparing newborns of women with physical (n = 114,685), sensory (n = 38,268), intellectual/developmental (n = 2,094), and multiple disabilities (n = 8,075) to newborns of women without a disability (n = 1,221,765). Within each group, we also examined maternal sociodemographic, health, health care, and pregnancy-related characteristics associated with the outcome.\nResultsCompared to newborns of women without disabilities (0.2%), newborns of women with physical (0.5%; aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69), sensory (0.4%; aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.59), intellectual/developmental (5.6%; aRR 5.34, 95% CI 4.36-6.53), and multiple disabilities (1.7%; aRR 3.09, 95% CI 2.56-3.72) had increased risk of being discharged to social services after the birth hospital stay. Within each group, the strongest predictors of the outcome were young maternal age, low income quintile, social assistance, maternal mental illness and substance use disorders, inadequate prenatal care, and neonatal morbidity.\nConclusionsNewborns of women with disabilities are at increased risk of being discharged to social services after the birth hospital stay. These findings can be used to inform the development of tailored supports for new mothers with disabilities and their infants.","PeriodicalId":507952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionRemoving a child from their family is the option of last resort for social services. However, decisions to place children into care are occurring more frequently and earlier in children's lives, with newborn discharge to social services being a particular concern due to the effects of mother-newborn separations on child development. Women with disabilities face negative assumptions about their parenting capacity, but little is known about their rates of newborn discharge to social services. ObjectivesTo examine the risk of discharge to social services among newborns of women with and without disabilities. MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study of singleton livebirths in Ontario, Canada, 2008-2019. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk (RR) of discharge to social services immediately after the birth hospital stay, comparing newborns of women with physical (n = 114,685), sensory (n = 38,268), intellectual/developmental (n = 2,094), and multiple disabilities (n = 8,075) to newborns of women without a disability (n = 1,221,765). Within each group, we also examined maternal sociodemographic, health, health care, and pregnancy-related characteristics associated with the outcome. ResultsCompared to newborns of women without disabilities (0.2%), newborns of women with physical (0.5%; aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69), sensory (0.4%; aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.59), intellectual/developmental (5.6%; aRR 5.34, 95% CI 4.36-6.53), and multiple disabilities (1.7%; aRR 3.09, 95% CI 2.56-3.72) had increased risk of being discharged to social services after the birth hospital stay. Within each group, the strongest predictors of the outcome were young maternal age, low income quintile, social assistance, maternal mental illness and substance use disorders, inadequate prenatal care, and neonatal morbidity. ConclusionsNewborns of women with disabilities are at increased risk of being discharged to social services after the birth hospital stay. These findings can be used to inform the development of tailored supports for new mothers with disabilities and their infants.
产妇残疾与新生儿接受社会服务:一项基于人口的研究
导言:让儿童离开家庭是社会服务部门最后的选择。然而,将儿童送入保育机构的决定在儿童生命中出现的频率越来越高,时间也越来越早,其中新生儿送入社会服务机构尤其令人担忧,因为母婴分离会影响儿童的发育。我们对 2008-2019 年加拿大安大略省的单胎活产婴儿进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。我们使用改良泊松回归法估算了出生住院后立即转入社会服务机构的相对风险 (RR),并将肢体残疾(n = 114,685 例)、感官残疾(n = 38,268 例)、智力/发育残疾(n = 2,094 例)和多重残疾(n = 8,075 例)产妇的新生儿与非残疾产妇的新生儿(n = 1,221,765 例)进行了比较。在每个组别中,我们还研究了与结果相关的产妇社会人口学、健康、医疗保健和妊娠相关特征。结果与无残疾妇女的新生儿(0.2%)相比,有肢体残疾(0.5%;aRR 1.53,95% CI 1.39-1.69)、感官残疾(0.4%;aRR 1.34,95% CI 1.12-1.59)、智力/发育残疾(5.6%;aRR 5.34,95% CI 4.36-6.53)和多重残疾(1.7%;aRR 3.09,95% CI 2.56-3.72)的新生儿在出生住院后被送往社会服务机构的风险增加。在每个组别中,预测结果最强的因素是年轻产妇年龄、低收入五分位数、社会援助、产妇精神疾病和药物使用障碍、产前护理不足以及新生儿发病率。这些发现可用于为残疾新妈妈及其婴儿提供量身定制的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信