The ROI of AI in lexicography

Lexicography Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1558/lexi.27569
Erin McKean, Will Fitzgerald
{"title":"The ROI of AI in lexicography","authors":"Erin McKean, Will Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1558/lexi.27569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are being used for many language-based tasks, including translation, summarization and paraphrasing, sentiment analysis, and for content-generation tasks, such as code generation, answering search queries in natural language, and to power chatbots in customer service and other domains. Since much modern lexicography is based on investigation and analysis of large-scale corpora analogous to the (much larger) corpora used to train LLMs, we hypothesize that LLMs could be used for typical lexicographic tasks. A commercially-available LLM API (OpenAI’s ChatGPT gpt-3.5-turbo) was used to complete typical lexicographic tasks, such as headword expansion, phrase and form finding, and creation of definitions and examples. The results showed that the output of this LLM is not up to the standard of human editorial work, requiring significant oversight because of errors and “hallucinations” (the tendency of LLMs to invent facts). In addition, the externalities of LLM use, including concerns about environmental impact and replication of bias, add to the overall cost.","PeriodicalId":515202,"journal":{"name":"Lexicography","volume":" 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexicography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/lexi.27569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being used for many language-based tasks, including translation, summarization and paraphrasing, sentiment analysis, and for content-generation tasks, such as code generation, answering search queries in natural language, and to power chatbots in customer service and other domains. Since much modern lexicography is based on investigation and analysis of large-scale corpora analogous to the (much larger) corpora used to train LLMs, we hypothesize that LLMs could be used for typical lexicographic tasks. A commercially-available LLM API (OpenAI’s ChatGPT gpt-3.5-turbo) was used to complete typical lexicographic tasks, such as headword expansion, phrase and form finding, and creation of definitions and examples. The results showed that the output of this LLM is not up to the standard of human editorial work, requiring significant oversight because of errors and “hallucinations” (the tendency of LLMs to invent facts). In addition, the externalities of LLM use, including concerns about environmental impact and replication of bias, add to the overall cost.
人工智能在词典学中的投资回报率
大型语言模型(LLM)正被用于许多基于语言的任务,包括翻译、摘要和转述、情感分析,以及内容生成任务,如代码生成、用自然语言回答搜索查询,以及为客户服务和其他领域的聊天机器人提供动力。由于现代词典学大多基于大规模语料库的调查和分析,类似于用于训练 LLM 的(更大的)语料库,因此我们假设 LLM 可用于典型的词典学任务。我们使用市面上的 LLM API(OpenAI 的 ChatGPT gpt-3.5-turbo)来完成典型的词典学任务,如词头扩展、短语和形式查找,以及创建定义和示例。结果表明,这种 LLM 的输出达不到人类编辑工作的标准,由于错误和 "幻觉"(LLM 编造事实的倾向),需要大量监督。此外,使用法律硕士的外部因素,包括对环境影响和复制偏见的担忧,也增加了总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信