Land Disputes and the Consequences on Social Economic Activities of Households in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Samuel Thiong’o, Philomena Muiruri, Jackson Musau
{"title":"Land Disputes and the Consequences on Social Economic Activities of Households in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya","authors":"Samuel Thiong’o, Philomena Muiruri, Jackson Musau","doi":"10.47941/ijcm.2035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigates the consequences of these land disputes on households’ social economic activities in Tharaka-Nithi County. \nMethodology: The study used descriptive research design targeting 1,598 disputed land claims in Chiakaraga ward, Tharaka Constituency in Tharaka-Nithi County which is greatly affected by many unresolved land disputes. A sample size of 94 households was picked using systematic random sampling, structured questionnaires and interview schedule administered to the focus group to collect primary data. Three purposively selected focus groups discussion from the village elders, household heads and non-governmental organizations (NGO) were organized in three different areas of the ward with ten participants each. Indeed, additional ten key informants from land officers, judiciary, interior coordination officer, elders and land tribunal members were purposively selected for interview. Quantitative data were summarized into frequency distribution tables, bar graphs and pie charts. Data from focus group discussion and interview schedule were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Anova and linear regression were conducted and determined the relationship between land disputes on household income of displaced households. \nFindings: The study found that landowners cultivate the disputed land in order to get food and generate income for their livelihood. The generated income was used to fund the filing of court cases in a bid to resolve land disputes. The study found that land disputes displace landowners, lower farm production and earnings. They also affected settlements of landowners since they feared displacement and demolition of their homesteads affecting their livelihood. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Findings from this study are helpful to stakeholders in land sector and policy makers in the county and national government in making decisions that will minimize causes of land disputes and quick resolution when they occur to spur social economic development \n ","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijcm.2035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the consequences of these land disputes on households’ social economic activities in Tharaka-Nithi County. Methodology: The study used descriptive research design targeting 1,598 disputed land claims in Chiakaraga ward, Tharaka Constituency in Tharaka-Nithi County which is greatly affected by many unresolved land disputes. A sample size of 94 households was picked using systematic random sampling, structured questionnaires and interview schedule administered to the focus group to collect primary data. Three purposively selected focus groups discussion from the village elders, household heads and non-governmental organizations (NGO) were organized in three different areas of the ward with ten participants each. Indeed, additional ten key informants from land officers, judiciary, interior coordination officer, elders and land tribunal members were purposively selected for interview. Quantitative data were summarized into frequency distribution tables, bar graphs and pie charts. Data from focus group discussion and interview schedule were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Anova and linear regression were conducted and determined the relationship between land disputes on household income of displaced households. Findings: The study found that landowners cultivate the disputed land in order to get food and generate income for their livelihood. The generated income was used to fund the filing of court cases in a bid to resolve land disputes. The study found that land disputes displace landowners, lower farm production and earnings. They also affected settlements of landowners since they feared displacement and demolition of their homesteads affecting their livelihood. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Findings from this study are helpful to stakeholders in land sector and policy makers in the county and national government in making decisions that will minimize causes of land disputes and quick resolution when they occur to spur social economic development  
土地纠纷及其对肯尼亚塔拉卡-尼蒂县家庭社会经济活动的影响
目的:本研究调查这些土地纠纷对 Tharaka-Nithi 县家庭社会经济活动的影响。研究方法:本研究采用描述性研究设计,以塔拉卡-尼提县塔拉卡选区 Chiakaraga 选区的 1,598 宗有争议的土地诉求为研究对象,该选区受到许多未解决的土地纠纷的严重影响。我们采用系统随机抽样法抽取了 94 户家庭作为样本,并向焦点小组发放了结构化问卷和访谈表,以收集原始数据。从村里的长者、户主和非政府组织(NGO)中有目的性地挑选了三个焦点小组,分别在选区的三个不同区域进行讨论,每个小组有 10 人参加。此外,还有的放矢地从土地官员、司法人员、内部协调官员、长老和土地法庭成员中挑选了 10 名关键信息提供者进行访谈。定量数据汇总为频率分布表、条形图和饼图。焦点小组讨论和访谈表中的数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行分析。进行了 Anova 和线性回归,以确定土地纠纷与流离失所家庭收入之间的关系。研究结果研究发现,土地所有者耕种有争议的土地是为了获得食物和创收。所产生的收入被用来资助向法院提起诉讼,以期解决土地纠纷。研究发现,土地纠纷使土地所有者流离失所,降低了农业产量和收入。土地纠纷还影响了土地所有者的定居,因为他们担心流离失所和家园被拆毁会影响他们的生计。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:这项研究的结果有助于土地部门的利益相关者以及县和国家政府的政策制定者做出决策,最大限度地减少土地纠纷的原因,并在发生纠纷时迅速解决,以促进社会经济发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信