Disaster Preparedness in Social Work: Enhancing Policy in Australian Human Service Organisations

Karen Bell, Heather Boetto
{"title":"Disaster Preparedness in Social Work: Enhancing Policy in Australian Human Service Organisations","authors":"Karen Bell, Heather Boetto","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcae111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article reports on a small study that aimed to enhance disaster preparedness policy in Australian human service organisations. Adopting a transformative ecosocial lens, the researchers collaborated with emergency services as part of action research (AR) to co-design a series of workshops. The objectives of the workshops were to progressively develop disaster preparedness policy relating to risk assessment, service continuity and recovery plans. Semi-structured interviews with eight participants from human service organisations were undertaken post-workshop to explore their experiences and the impacts of workshops on organisational policy. Qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis. Five key themes emerged from the data. The themes were knowledge acquisition, the interrelationship between policy and practice, inter- and intra-professional relationships, organisational challenges and marginalisation. Whilst results indicated that workshops provided participants with opportunities to enhance disaster preparedness policy, participants described ongoing challenges inhibiting their progress within an organisational context. Implications for social work highlight the interrelationship between policy and practice and underscore the value of the profession’s multidimensional approach to practice. The need to disrupt the influence of the neoliberal discourse within the organisational context is critical for enhancing disaster preparedness and for mitigating the inequitable impacts of disasters on marginalised groups.","PeriodicalId":510024,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Social Work","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on a small study that aimed to enhance disaster preparedness policy in Australian human service organisations. Adopting a transformative ecosocial lens, the researchers collaborated with emergency services as part of action research (AR) to co-design a series of workshops. The objectives of the workshops were to progressively develop disaster preparedness policy relating to risk assessment, service continuity and recovery plans. Semi-structured interviews with eight participants from human service organisations were undertaken post-workshop to explore their experiences and the impacts of workshops on organisational policy. Qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis. Five key themes emerged from the data. The themes were knowledge acquisition, the interrelationship between policy and practice, inter- and intra-professional relationships, organisational challenges and marginalisation. Whilst results indicated that workshops provided participants with opportunities to enhance disaster preparedness policy, participants described ongoing challenges inhibiting their progress within an organisational context. Implications for social work highlight the interrelationship between policy and practice and underscore the value of the profession’s multidimensional approach to practice. The need to disrupt the influence of the neoliberal discourse within the organisational context is critical for enhancing disaster preparedness and for mitigating the inequitable impacts of disasters on marginalised groups.
社会工作中的备灾工作:加强澳大利亚人类服务组织的政策
本文报告了一项小型研究,该研究旨在加强澳大利亚人力服务机构的备灾政策。作为行动研究(AR)的一部分,研究人员采用变革性生态社会视角,与应急服务机构合作,共同设计了一系列研讨会。研讨会的目标是逐步制定与风险评估、服务连续性和恢复计划相关的备灾政策。工作坊结束后,对来自人类服务机构的八名参与者进行了半结构式访谈,以探讨他们的经验以及工作坊对机构政策的影响。采用主题分析法对定性数据进行了研究。数据中出现了五个关键主题。这些主题分别是知识获取、政策与实践之间的相互关系、专业间和专业内关系、组织挑战和边缘化。结果表明,研讨会为参与者提供了加强备灾政策的机会,但参与者也描述了在组织环境中阻碍他们进步的持续挑战。对社会工作的影响突出了政策与实践之间的相互关系,并强调了社会工作专业多维实践方法的价值。需要在组织环境中打破新自由主义话语的影响,这对于加强备灾和减轻灾害对边缘化群体的不公平影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信