Scrap Float Detection in a Blanking Die Set with Multiple Retrofit Accelerometers Using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System

IF 0.9 Q4 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Takahiro Ohashi
{"title":"Scrap Float Detection in a Blanking Die Set with Multiple Retrofit Accelerometers Using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System","authors":"Takahiro Ohashi","doi":"10.20965/ijat.2024.p0537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of scrap floating for a stamping die with 0.8 mm-thick A1050 aluminum sheets was conducted with multiple retrofit accelerometers attached to the outside of the stamping die-set. The accelerometers were attached to three locations on the side of the stripper plate and one location on the side of the punch plate of a 3-ϕ30 hole blanking die using a magnet-based jig. Anomaly detection technique using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi system was conducted with the gravity analysis of the waveform of the accelerometers’ signal. A total of 106 experiments without foreign objects (i.e., a scrap) were conducted to collect instances of the signal profile for the normal samples. In addition, 24 error samples with a foreign object were fabricated for anomaly detection tests. Only one of the four locations achieved 100% accuracy in detection using only one sensor. In detection using only one sensor, only one of the four locations achieved 100% accuracy. We attempted to improve the accuracy by increasing the amount of learning. However, the accuracy did not improve by increasing the amount of training except for the one sensor mentioned above. This result implies that machine learning, in which features are predefined by the user, cannot compensate for the disadvantage of sensor location by the amount of training. Then, combinations of the sensors were examined. Learning with all features of all 4 sensors (i.e., with 12 features) resulted in a still imperfect separation between normal and error samples. However, even if a single sensor causes false positives, it was possible to combine the influential features of multiple sensors, that were chosen by SN ratio analysis, to detect all anomalies without false positives. In future work, we would like to consider the detection of anomalies with multi-discipline features and combine anomaly detection systems with design and quality control systems.","PeriodicalId":43716,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automation Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automation Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2024.p0537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detection of scrap floating for a stamping die with 0.8 mm-thick A1050 aluminum sheets was conducted with multiple retrofit accelerometers attached to the outside of the stamping die-set. The accelerometers were attached to three locations on the side of the stripper plate and one location on the side of the punch plate of a 3-ϕ30 hole blanking die using a magnet-based jig. Anomaly detection technique using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi system was conducted with the gravity analysis of the waveform of the accelerometers’ signal. A total of 106 experiments without foreign objects (i.e., a scrap) were conducted to collect instances of the signal profile for the normal samples. In addition, 24 error samples with a foreign object were fabricated for anomaly detection tests. Only one of the four locations achieved 100% accuracy in detection using only one sensor. In detection using only one sensor, only one of the four locations achieved 100% accuracy. We attempted to improve the accuracy by increasing the amount of learning. However, the accuracy did not improve by increasing the amount of training except for the one sensor mentioned above. This result implies that machine learning, in which features are predefined by the user, cannot compensate for the disadvantage of sensor location by the amount of training. Then, combinations of the sensors were examined. Learning with all features of all 4 sensors (i.e., with 12 features) resulted in a still imperfect separation between normal and error samples. However, even if a single sensor causes false positives, it was possible to combine the influential features of multiple sensors, that were chosen by SN ratio analysis, to detect all anomalies without false positives. In future work, we would like to consider the detection of anomalies with multi-discipline features and combine anomaly detection systems with design and quality control systems.
使用 Mahalanobis-Taguchi 系统检测带有多个改装加速度计的冲裁模具中的废料浮动情况
使用安装在冲压模组外部的多个加装加速度计,对装有 0.8 毫米厚 A1050 铝板的冲压模进行废料浮动检测。加速度计安装在脱料板侧面的三个位置,以及使用磁铁夹具安装在 3-ϕ30 孔冲压模冲孔板侧面的一个位置。使用 Mahalanobis-Taguchi 系统的异常检测技术对加速度计信号的波形进行了重力分析。共进行了 106 次无异物(即废料)实验,以收集正常样本的信号轮廓实例。此外,还制作了 24 个带有异物的错误样本,用于异常检测测试。在仅使用一个传感器进行检测的四个地点中,只有一个地点的检测准确率达到 100%。在仅使用一个传感器的检测中,四个位置中只有一个达到了 100% 的准确率。我们试图通过增加学习量来提高准确率。然而,除了上述一个传感器外,准确率并没有随着训练量的增加而提高。这一结果表明,由用户预先定义特征的机器学习无法通过训练量来弥补传感器位置的劣势。然后,对传感器的组合进行了研究。使用所有 4 个传感器的所有特征(即 12 个特征)进行学习后,正常样本和错误样本之间的分离仍然不完美。不过,即使单个传感器导致误报,通过 SN 比分析选择的多个传感器的影响特征也有可能结合在一起,从而检测出所有异常情况,而不会出现误报。在今后的工作中,我们希望考虑利用多学科特征检测异常,并将异常检测系统与设计和质量控制系统结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Automation Technology
International Journal of Automation Technology AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信