What supports the emotional well-being of peer workers in an NHS mental health service?

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Sam Robertson, Helen Leigh-Phippard, Donald Robertson, Abigail Thomson, Jessica Casey, Lucy Jane Walsh
{"title":"What supports the emotional well-being of peer workers in an NHS mental health service?","authors":"Sam Robertson, Helen Leigh-Phippard, Donald Robertson, Abigail Thomson, Jessica Casey, Lucy Jane Walsh","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-02-2024-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to explore the experiences of peers working in a range of roles within a single NHS mental health service. This study also aims to provide evidence of the impact of existing support, organisational structure and culture around peer working and provide recommendations for a Good Practice Guide for Peer Working. Peer roles require lived experience of mental health conditions and/or services. While the impact on them of using their own lived experience is not fully understood, anecdotal evidence suggests that peer workers may experience a greater emotional impact than other mental health workers. Burnout and retention are particular concerns.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis was a two-stage study using focus groups and reflexive thematic analysis in Stage 1. The key themes formed the basis of the Stage 2 workshop, which provided recommendations for a Good Practice Guide. The study team consisted of peer researchers with lived experience, supported by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel.\n\nFindings\nThere is a perceived lack of support and an increased peer burden for peer workers. Recommendations included relevant ongoing training and development; support and supervision; and organisational cultural change.\n\nOriginality/value\nWorking within a peer-led co-production framework, this study contributes to the development of the evidence base for peer emotional labour. Based on the findings, a Good Practice Guide for Peer Working is being developed to promote good practice for the development of future peer worker roles.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-02-2024-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the experiences of peers working in a range of roles within a single NHS mental health service. This study also aims to provide evidence of the impact of existing support, organisational structure and culture around peer working and provide recommendations for a Good Practice Guide for Peer Working. Peer roles require lived experience of mental health conditions and/or services. While the impact on them of using their own lived experience is not fully understood, anecdotal evidence suggests that peer workers may experience a greater emotional impact than other mental health workers. Burnout and retention are particular concerns. Design/methodology/approach This was a two-stage study using focus groups and reflexive thematic analysis in Stage 1. The key themes formed the basis of the Stage 2 workshop, which provided recommendations for a Good Practice Guide. The study team consisted of peer researchers with lived experience, supported by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel. Findings There is a perceived lack of support and an increased peer burden for peer workers. Recommendations included relevant ongoing training and development; support and supervision; and organisational cultural change. Originality/value Working within a peer-led co-production framework, this study contributes to the development of the evidence base for peer emotional labour. Based on the findings, a Good Practice Guide for Peer Working is being developed to promote good practice for the development of future peer worker roles.
是什么支持了国家医疗服务体系心理健康服务中同伴工作者的情绪健康?
研究目的 本研究旨在探讨在国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的精神健康服务机构中担任各种角色的同伴的工作经验。本研究还旨在提供证据,证明现有的支持、组织结构和文化对同伴工作的影响,并为同伴工作的良好实践指南提供建议。同伴角色需要对精神健康状况和/或服务有亲身体验。虽然我们还不完全了解利用自己的生活经验对同伴的影响,但轶事证据表明,同伴工作者可能会比其他心理健康工作者受到更大的情绪影响。设计/方法/途径 这是一项分两个阶段进行的研究,第一阶段使用焦点小组和反思性主题分析。关键主题构成了第二阶段研讨会的基础,为《良好实践指南》提供了建议。研究小组由具有生活经验的同伴研究人员组成,并由生活经验咨询小组提供支持。研究结果同伴工作者认为缺乏支持,同伴负担加重。建议包括相关的持续培训和发展、支持和监督以及组织文化变革。原创性/价值本研究在同伴主导的共同生产框架内开展工作,为同伴情感劳动证据基础的发展做出了贡献。在研究结果的基础上,正在制定《同伴工作良好实践指南》,以推广良好实践,促进未来同伴工作者角色的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信