Effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing transplant surgery: Meta-Analysis of randomized control studies

Ameer Fadhel Abbas, Haania Shahbaz, Armand Gumera, Ali Saad Al-shammari, M. Alchamaley, Hashim Talib Hashim, Mohannad Abdeltawwab, Mahmoud Amin
{"title":"Effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing transplant surgery: Meta-Analysis of randomized control studies","authors":"Ameer Fadhel Abbas, Haania Shahbaz, Armand Gumera, Ali Saad Al-shammari, M. Alchamaley, Hashim Talib Hashim, Mohannad Abdeltawwab, Mahmoud Amin","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a phenomenon in which the induction of shortened periods of ischemia prior to surgical procedures within a distant tissue preserves other tissues or organs of concern, such as the liver or kidney in transplant surgery, in the event of prolonged ischemic insults. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery, specifically kidney and liver transplants.\n \n \n \n PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 19 December 2023 for trials evaluating RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery. A total of 9364 search articles were obtained, which yielded 10 eligible studies. Data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4 software. The risk of bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool.\n \n \n \n For graft rejection, the study observed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.98, P=0.97) from 5 trials, indicating no significant effect of RIPC on graft survival in both kidney and liver transplants. The length of hospital stay also showed no significant decrease for those undergoing RIPC, with (MD) of -0.58 (95% CI, -1.38 to 0.23, P=0.16). GFR at 1 year post-kidney transplant did not significantly change in the RIPC group compared to controls, as evidenced by an MD of -0.13 (95% CI, -3.79 to 3.54, P=0.95). These results collectively suggest that RIPC may not be effective in reducing patient, or graft, outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"221 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a phenomenon in which the induction of shortened periods of ischemia prior to surgical procedures within a distant tissue preserves other tissues or organs of concern, such as the liver or kidney in transplant surgery, in the event of prolonged ischemic insults. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery, specifically kidney and liver transplants. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 19 December 2023 for trials evaluating RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery. A total of 9364 search articles were obtained, which yielded 10 eligible studies. Data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4 software. The risk of bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool. For graft rejection, the study observed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.98, P=0.97) from 5 trials, indicating no significant effect of RIPC on graft survival in both kidney and liver transplants. The length of hospital stay also showed no significant decrease for those undergoing RIPC, with (MD) of -0.58 (95% CI, -1.38 to 0.23, P=0.16). GFR at 1 year post-kidney transplant did not significantly change in the RIPC group compared to controls, as evidenced by an MD of -0.13 (95% CI, -3.79 to 3.54, P=0.95). These results collectively suggest that RIPC may not be effective in reducing patient, or graft, outcomes.
移植手术患者远程缺血预处理的有效性:随机对照研究的 Meta 分析
远端缺血预处理(RIPC)是指在远端组织内进行外科手术之前诱导缩短缺血时间,从而在长时间缺血损伤的情况下保护其他相关组织或器官(如移植手术中的肝脏或肾脏)。我们旨在评估 RIPC 对接受移植手术(尤其是肾脏和肝脏移植)的患者的有效性。 截至 2023 年 12 月 19 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 上检索了对接受移植手术的患者进行 RIPC 评估的试验。共获得 9364 篇检索文章,其中符合条件的研究有 10 项。数据分析采用RevMan 5.4软件进行。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行偏倚风险分析。 在移植物排斥方面,研究观察到 5 项试验的相对风险为 0.99(95% CI,0.49 至 1.98,P=0.97),表明 RIPC 对肾移植和肝移植的移植物存活率没有显著影响。接受RIPC治疗的患者住院时间也没有明显缩短,(MD)为-0.58(95% CI,-1.38至0.23,P=0.16)。与对照组相比,RIPC组在肾移植后1年的GFR没有明显变化,MD为-0.13(95% CI,-3.79至3.54,P=0.95)。这些结果共同表明,RIPC 可能无法有效降低患者或移植物的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信