Optimization of Performance, Emissions, and Vibration in a Hydrogen-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Using Response Surface Methodology

Q4 Engineering
Subani Shaik, Vinay Kumar Domakonda, Farooq Shaik, Anil Kumar T Ch
{"title":"Optimization of Performance, Emissions, and Vibration in a\nHydrogen-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Using Response Surface Methodology","authors":"Subani Shaik, Vinay Kumar Domakonda, Farooq Shaik, Anil Kumar T Ch","doi":"10.2174/0122127976322070240621095449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDual-fuel diesel engines using hydrogen as a secondary fuel source are a\npromising technology for reducing emissions while maintaining engine performance. However, optimizing these engines for all three aspects (performance, emissions, and vibration) simultaneously\npresents a challenge.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to address this challenge by employing Response Surface Methodology, a statistical technique used to optimize multi-variable processes. The goal was to find the ideal\ncombination of engine load, hydrogen flow rate, and compression ratio that would maximize Brake\nThermal Efficiency while minimizing Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption, Nitrogen Oxide emissions, and engine vibration.\n\n\n\nA Box-Behnken design, a specific type of design optimization with three factors and three\nlevels, was employed. The experiment evaluated the impact of three key factors: engine load (ranging from 0 - 12 kg), hydrogen flow rate (0-15 L/min), and compression ratio (16 to 18:1). The effects of these factors on performance, emissions, and vibration were measured.\n\n\n\nThe results revealed a trade-off between achieving optimal performance and minimizing\nemissions. The highest Brake Thermal Efficiency and lowest Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption\nwere achieved at a high compression ratio (18:1), maximum hydrogen flow rate (15 L/min), and\nunder full engine load (12 kg), corresponding to a brake power of 3.5 kW. However, these conditions also resulted in higher NOx emissions and vibration levels. Conversely, minimizing NOx and\nvibration occurred at a lower compression ratio (16:1), with the same maximum hydrogen flow rate\n(15 L/min), but at a significantly reduced engine load (3 kg), resulting in a much lower brake power\nof 0.875 kW.\n\n\n\nThese findings highlight the complex relationship between performance, emissions,\nand vibration in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine optimized using Response Surface Methodology. While optimal conditions were identified for specific goals, achieving all desired characteristics\nsimultaneously across the entire operating range remains a challenge.\n","PeriodicalId":39169,"journal":{"name":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122127976322070240621095449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dual-fuel diesel engines using hydrogen as a secondary fuel source are a promising technology for reducing emissions while maintaining engine performance. However, optimizing these engines for all three aspects (performance, emissions, and vibration) simultaneously presents a challenge. This study aimed to address this challenge by employing Response Surface Methodology, a statistical technique used to optimize multi-variable processes. The goal was to find the ideal combination of engine load, hydrogen flow rate, and compression ratio that would maximize Brake Thermal Efficiency while minimizing Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption, Nitrogen Oxide emissions, and engine vibration. A Box-Behnken design, a specific type of design optimization with three factors and three levels, was employed. The experiment evaluated the impact of three key factors: engine load (ranging from 0 - 12 kg), hydrogen flow rate (0-15 L/min), and compression ratio (16 to 18:1). The effects of these factors on performance, emissions, and vibration were measured. The results revealed a trade-off between achieving optimal performance and minimizing emissions. The highest Brake Thermal Efficiency and lowest Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption were achieved at a high compression ratio (18:1), maximum hydrogen flow rate (15 L/min), and under full engine load (12 kg), corresponding to a brake power of 3.5 kW. However, these conditions also resulted in higher NOx emissions and vibration levels. Conversely, minimizing NOx and vibration occurred at a lower compression ratio (16:1), with the same maximum hydrogen flow rate (15 L/min), but at a significantly reduced engine load (3 kg), resulting in a much lower brake power of 0.875 kW. These findings highlight the complex relationship between performance, emissions, and vibration in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine optimized using Response Surface Methodology. While optimal conditions were identified for specific goals, achieving all desired characteristics simultaneously across the entire operating range remains a challenge.
利用响应面方法优化氢-柴油双燃料发动机的性能、排放和振动
使用氢气作为辅助燃料的双燃料柴油发动机是一种既能减少排放又能保持发动机性能的新兴技术。本研究旨在通过采用响应面方法(一种用于优化多变量过程的统计技术)来应对这一挑战。目标是找到发动机负荷、氢气流速和压缩比的理想组合,使制动热效率最大化,同时使制动油耗、氮氧化物排放和发动机振动最小化。实验评估了三个关键因素的影响:发动机负荷(0 - 12 千克)、氢气流速(0 - 15 升/分钟)和压缩比(16 - 18:1)。测量了这些因素对性能、排放和振动的影响。结果表明,在实现最佳性能和最小化排放之间需要进行权衡。在高压缩比(18:1)、最大氢气流量(15 升/分钟)和发动机满负荷(12 千克)(相当于 3.5 千瓦的制动功率)条件下,实现了最高的制动热效率和最低的制动油耗。然而,这些条件也导致了较高的氮氧化物排放和振动水平。相反,在压缩比较低(16:1)、最大氢气流量相同(15 升/分钟)但发动机负荷明显降低(3 千克)的条件下,氮氧化物和振动最小化,导致制动功率大大降低,仅为 0.875 千瓦。虽然针对特定目标确定了最佳条件,但在整个工作范围内同时实现所有预期特性仍是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering
Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信