Evaluating the impact of students' generative AI use in educational contexts

Dwayne Wood, Scott H. Moss
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of students' generative AI use in educational contexts","authors":"Dwayne Wood, Scott H. Moss","doi":"10.1108/jrit-06-2024-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on students' learning experiences and perceptions through a master’s-level course. The study specifically focused on student engagement, comfort with GenAI and ethical considerations.Design/methodology/approachThe study used an action research methodology employing qualitative data collection methods, including pre- and post-course surveys, reflective assignments, class discussions and a questionnaire. The AI-Ideas, Connections, Extensions (ICE) Framework, combining the ICE Model and AI paradigms, is used to assess students' cognitive engagement with GenAI.FindingsThe study revealed that incorporating GenAI in a master’s-level instructional design course increased students' comfort with GenAI and their understanding of its ethical implications. The AI-ICE Framework demonstrated most students were at the initial engagement level, with growing awareness of GenAI’s limitations and ethical issues. Course reflections highlighted themes of improved teaching strategies, personal growth and the practical challenges of integrating GenAI responsibly.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size poses challenges to the analytical power of the findings, potentially limiting the breadth and applicability of conclusions. This constraint may affect the generalizability of the results, as the participants may not fully represent the broader population of interest. The researchers are mindful of these limitations and suggest caution in interpreting the findings, acknowledging that they may offer more exploratory insights than definitive conclusions. Future research endeavors should aim to recruit a larger cohort to validate and expand upon the initial observations, ensuring a more robust understanding.Originality/valueThe study is original in its integration of GenAI into a master's-level instructional design course, assessing both the practical and ethical implications of its use in education. By utilizing the AI-ICE Framework to evaluate students' cognitive engagement and employing action research methodology, the study provides insights into how GenAI influences learning experiences and perceptions. This approach bridges the gap between theoretical understanding and the real-world application of GenAI, offering actionable strategies for its responsible use in educational settings.","PeriodicalId":244951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","volume":" 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-06-2024-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on students' learning experiences and perceptions through a master’s-level course. The study specifically focused on student engagement, comfort with GenAI and ethical considerations.Design/methodology/approachThe study used an action research methodology employing qualitative data collection methods, including pre- and post-course surveys, reflective assignments, class discussions and a questionnaire. The AI-Ideas, Connections, Extensions (ICE) Framework, combining the ICE Model and AI paradigms, is used to assess students' cognitive engagement with GenAI.FindingsThe study revealed that incorporating GenAI in a master’s-level instructional design course increased students' comfort with GenAI and their understanding of its ethical implications. The AI-ICE Framework demonstrated most students were at the initial engagement level, with growing awareness of GenAI’s limitations and ethical issues. Course reflections highlighted themes of improved teaching strategies, personal growth and the practical challenges of integrating GenAI responsibly.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size poses challenges to the analytical power of the findings, potentially limiting the breadth and applicability of conclusions. This constraint may affect the generalizability of the results, as the participants may not fully represent the broader population of interest. The researchers are mindful of these limitations and suggest caution in interpreting the findings, acknowledging that they may offer more exploratory insights than definitive conclusions. Future research endeavors should aim to recruit a larger cohort to validate and expand upon the initial observations, ensuring a more robust understanding.Originality/valueThe study is original in its integration of GenAI into a master's-level instructional design course, assessing both the practical and ethical implications of its use in education. By utilizing the AI-ICE Framework to evaluate students' cognitive engagement and employing action research methodology, the study provides insights into how GenAI influences learning experiences and perceptions. This approach bridges the gap between theoretical understanding and the real-world application of GenAI, offering actionable strategies for its responsible use in educational settings.
评估学生在教育环境中使用生成式人工智能的影响
目的本研究旨在通过一门硕士课程,评估生成式人工智能(GenAI)对学生学习体验和感知的影响。该研究特别关注学生的参与度、对 GenAI 的舒适度以及道德方面的考虑。该研究采用行动研究方法,采用定性数据收集方法,包括课前和课后调查、反思性作业、课堂讨论和问卷调查。研究结果表明,将 GenAI 纳入硕士阶段的教学设计课程,提高了学生对 GenAI 的舒适度以及对其伦理意义的理解。AI-ICE 框架表明,大多数学生处于初始参与水平,对 GenAI 的局限性和伦理问题的认识不断提高。课程反思突出了改进教学策略、个人成长和负责任地整合 GenAI 的实际挑战等主题。研究局限性/意义样本规模小对研究结果的分析能力提出了挑战,可能会限制结论的广度和适用性。这种限制可能会影响结果的普遍性,因为参与者可能无法完全代表更广泛的相关人群。研究人员注意到了这些局限性,并建议在解释研究结果时谨慎从事,同时承认这些结果提供的可能更多是探索性的见解,而不是确定性的结论。未来的研究工作应着眼于招募更大规模的群体,以验证和扩展最初的观察结果,确保获得更有力的理解。原创性/价值本研究的原创性在于将 GenAI 整合到硕士水平的教学设计课程中,评估其在教育中使用的实用性和伦理意义。通过利用 AI-ICE 框架来评估学生的认知参与度,并采用行动研究方法,本研究深入探讨了 GenAI 如何影响学习体验和认知。这种方法弥合了对 GenAI 的理论理解与实际应用之间的差距,为在教育环境中负责任地使用 GenAI 提供了可行的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信