Researchers’ Experiences At The Time Of Covid-19 Outbreak Among Tertiary Institutions In Calabar Metropolis, Nigeria

Delight Omoji Idika I, Henrietta Osayi Uchegbue, Chidimma I Idika, Kelechi Uhegbu
{"title":"Researchers’ Experiences At The Time Of Covid-19 Outbreak Among Tertiary Institutions In Calabar Metropolis, Nigeria","authors":"Delight Omoji Idika I, Henrietta Osayi Uchegbue, Chidimma I Idika, Kelechi Uhegbu","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v30i2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to investigate COVID-19 outbreak in Calabar Metropolis. This really analyzed the challenges encountered in carrying out educational research in the time of Covid-19 pandemic, and then, offered solution to strengthen research activities at all times. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional mix methods design involving both qualitative (exploratory) and quantitative (explanatory) approaches. Four research questions and two hypotheses guided the quantitative part of the study while the qualitative part was guided by the a key informant interview with responses grouped in themes and subthemes – reflecting the direct quotes of the participants. The population of this study included all university lecturers (3,860) and postgraduate students (2,383) from public and private tertiary institutions in Calabar Metropolies who were researching at the time of this study. A total of 600 male and female researchers constituted the sample for the quantitative study while 24 key informants constituted the participants for the qualitative part of the study. Participants were sampled through purposive sampling technique to recruit only respondents that have rich information for the study. As inclusion criteria, only researchers who were researching at the time of data collection in the period of the pandemic were recruited in this study. The researchers’ questionnaire and key informant interview guide were the instruments validated and used for data collection. The estimates of Cronbach alpha reliability of the instruments ranged between 0.82 and 0.87. Data were analyzed through descriptive (frequencies and percentages) and inferential statistics (independent t-test and analysis of variance- ANOVA). Data from the qualitative part was transcribed and thematically reported verbatim. Ethical clearance was obtained from Cross River State Research Ethics Committee. One of the major experiences of researchers during the pandemic is the inability to interface with respondents, 61.5% of respondents could not participate in the studies because of fear of contracting the virus. Majority of the respondents (91.5%) admitted that the outbreak did help to facilitate the use and mastery of the media in research especially in data collection via calls (50.2%), e-mails (38.5%), zoom (14.8%). The study found out that researchers encountered both negative and positive impact of COVID-19 in the course of researching during the pandemic and this was found to be more among female lecturers and students than their male counterparts. In conclusion, there was high attrition rate and inability to conduct face-to-face investigation and this led to greater need for utilization of media, ICT, and technology in research during the pandemic. This has significant policy implication for increasing technology use and greater capacity building in these areas for enhanced performance in research activities of lecturers and graduate students especially in critical times.   \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v30i2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate COVID-19 outbreak in Calabar Metropolis. This really analyzed the challenges encountered in carrying out educational research in the time of Covid-19 pandemic, and then, offered solution to strengthen research activities at all times. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional mix methods design involving both qualitative (exploratory) and quantitative (explanatory) approaches. Four research questions and two hypotheses guided the quantitative part of the study while the qualitative part was guided by the a key informant interview with responses grouped in themes and subthemes – reflecting the direct quotes of the participants. The population of this study included all university lecturers (3,860) and postgraduate students (2,383) from public and private tertiary institutions in Calabar Metropolies who were researching at the time of this study. A total of 600 male and female researchers constituted the sample for the quantitative study while 24 key informants constituted the participants for the qualitative part of the study. Participants were sampled through purposive sampling technique to recruit only respondents that have rich information for the study. As inclusion criteria, only researchers who were researching at the time of data collection in the period of the pandemic were recruited in this study. The researchers’ questionnaire and key informant interview guide were the instruments validated and used for data collection. The estimates of Cronbach alpha reliability of the instruments ranged between 0.82 and 0.87. Data were analyzed through descriptive (frequencies and percentages) and inferential statistics (independent t-test and analysis of variance- ANOVA). Data from the qualitative part was transcribed and thematically reported verbatim. Ethical clearance was obtained from Cross River State Research Ethics Committee. One of the major experiences of researchers during the pandemic is the inability to interface with respondents, 61.5% of respondents could not participate in the studies because of fear of contracting the virus. Majority of the respondents (91.5%) admitted that the outbreak did help to facilitate the use and mastery of the media in research especially in data collection via calls (50.2%), e-mails (38.5%), zoom (14.8%). The study found out that researchers encountered both negative and positive impact of COVID-19 in the course of researching during the pandemic and this was found to be more among female lecturers and students than their male counterparts. In conclusion, there was high attrition rate and inability to conduct face-to-face investigation and this led to greater need for utilization of media, ICT, and technology in research during the pandemic. This has significant policy implication for increasing technology use and greater capacity building in these areas for enhanced performance in research activities of lecturers and graduate students especially in critical times.      
尼日利亚卡拉巴尔市高等院校研究人员在 Covid-19 爆发时的经历
本研究旨在调查卡拉巴尔市爆发的 COVID-19 疫情。研究分析了在 COVID-19 大流行期间开展教育研究所遇到的挑战,并提出了在任何时候都要加强研究活动的解决方案。研究采用了描述性横断面混合方法设计,包括定性(探索性)和定量(解释性)方法。定量研究部分以四个研究问题和两个假设为指导,定性研究部分则以关键信息提供者访谈为指导,访谈中的回答按主题和次主题分组--反映了参与者的直接引述。研究对象包括卡拉巴尔大都会公立和私立高等院校的所有大学讲师(3,860 人)和研究生(2,383 人),他们在研究期间都在从事研究工作。共有 600 名男女研究人员构成了定量研究的样本,24 名关键信息提供者构成了定性研究的参与者。研究人员是通过有目的的抽样技术抽取的,目的是只招募那些拥有丰富研究信息的受访者。作为纳入标准,只有在大流行期间收集数据时正在进行研究的研究人员才被纳入本研究。研究人员的调查问卷和关键信息提供者访谈指南是经过验证并用于数据收集的工具。这些工具的 Cronbach alpha 可靠性估计值介于 0.82 和 0.87 之间。数据通过描述性统计(频率和百分比)和推论性统计(独立 t 检验和方差分析--方差分析)进行分析。对定性部分的数据进行了逐字记录和专题报告。伦理审查获得了克罗斯河州研究伦理委员会的批准。研究人员在大流行病期间的主要经历之一是无法与受访者接触,61.5% 的受访者因害怕感染病毒而无法参与研究。大多数受访者(91.5%)承认,疫情确实有助于促进在研究中使用和掌握媒体,特别是通过电话(50.2%)、电子邮件(38.5%)和变焦(14.8%)收集数据。研究发现,研究人员在大流行期间的研究过程中既遇到了 COVID-19 的负面影响,也遇到了它的正面影响。总之,由于自然减员率高且无法进行面对面的调查,因此在大流行病期间的研究中更需要利用媒体、信息和通信技术以及科技。这对增加技术的使用和加强这些领域的能力建设具有重要的政策意义,可以提高讲师和研究生在研究活动中的表现,尤其是在关键时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信