Aristotle's Inner Logic of Justice: Based on the Nicomachus Ethics

Wang Shu
{"title":"Aristotle's Inner Logic of Justice: Based on the Nicomachus Ethics","authors":"Wang Shu","doi":"10.62051/cj0fh925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aristotle discusses the issue of justice in Volume V of the Nicomachan Ethics, including the connotation of justice, several types of justice, and the relationship between justice and willing behavior. Aristotle seems to have no rules and regulations in his discourse, but in fact, he has his inherent logic. Aristotle first provides a specific explanation of justice and divides it into overall justice and specific justice. Overall justice is related to virtue, reflecting more of an individual's quality and possessing individuality; The specific justice is closely related to the life of the city-state, and is also the main object of discussion by the Aristocrats. The purpose of discussing justice is also for the overall happiness of the city-state. It is not difficult to see the city-state nature of the justice it discusses, and natural justice and agreed justice are closely related to the evolution of the city-state. Finally, Aristotle brought justice back to the individual, exploring the relationship between justice, injustice, and willful behavior, returning to individuality, which is also the individuality in the city-state. It can be said that Aristotle's theory of justice is interpreted along the internal logic of individuality, city-state, and individuality. However, at the same time, city-state cannot represent complete justice and happiness, so justice ultimately returns to the soul quality of the individual. Justice is the manifestation of individual virtue in the city-state, and city-state and individuality complement each other to achieve the goal of justice - the happiness of the political community.","PeriodicalId":512428,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","volume":" August","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62051/cj0fh925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aristotle discusses the issue of justice in Volume V of the Nicomachan Ethics, including the connotation of justice, several types of justice, and the relationship between justice and willing behavior. Aristotle seems to have no rules and regulations in his discourse, but in fact, he has his inherent logic. Aristotle first provides a specific explanation of justice and divides it into overall justice and specific justice. Overall justice is related to virtue, reflecting more of an individual's quality and possessing individuality; The specific justice is closely related to the life of the city-state, and is also the main object of discussion by the Aristocrats. The purpose of discussing justice is also for the overall happiness of the city-state. It is not difficult to see the city-state nature of the justice it discusses, and natural justice and agreed justice are closely related to the evolution of the city-state. Finally, Aristotle brought justice back to the individual, exploring the relationship between justice, injustice, and willful behavior, returning to individuality, which is also the individuality in the city-state. It can be said that Aristotle's theory of justice is interpreted along the internal logic of individuality, city-state, and individuality. However, at the same time, city-state cannot represent complete justice and happiness, so justice ultimately returns to the soul quality of the individual. Justice is the manifestation of individual virtue in the city-state, and city-state and individuality complement each other to achieve the goal of justice - the happiness of the political community.
亚里士多德的内在正义逻辑:基于尼科马格斯伦理学
亚里士多德在《尼科马根伦理学》第五卷中论述了正义问题,包括正义的内涵、正义的几种类型以及正义与意愿行为之间的关系。亚里士多德的论述看似无章可循,实则有其内在逻辑。亚里士多德首先对正义进行了具体解释,并将正义分为总体正义和具体正义。总体正义与美德相关,更多体现的是个人的品质,具有个性;具体正义与城邦生活密切相关,也是亚里士多德讨论的主要对象。讨论正义的目的也是为了城邦的整体幸福。不难看出,其讨论的正义具有城邦性质,自然正义和约定正义与城邦的演变息息相关。最后,亚里士多德将正义回归到个人,探讨正义、非正义、意志行为之间的关系,回归到个体性,这也是城邦中的个体性。可以说,亚里士多德的正义理论是沿着个体性、城邦性、个体性的内在逻辑进行阐释的。但同时,城邦并不能代表完整的正义与幸福,所以正义最终还是要回归到个体的灵魂品质。正义是个体德性在城邦中的体现,城邦与个体性相辅相成,共同实现正义的目标--政治共同体的幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信