Mary Casey, Áine Carroll, David Coghlan, Diarmuid Stokes
{"title":"Appraising Quality in Action Research in Healthcare Settings","authors":"Mary Casey, Áine Carroll, David Coghlan, Diarmuid Stokes","doi":"10.3224/ijar.v20i1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criteria for establishing the quality of action research is of increasing interest to researchers and practitioners however, it is not known how well these criteria are used. This review addresses this issue by appraising extant measures that assess quality in action research. Taking Coghlan and Shani’s (2014, 2018) four quality factors: context, quality of relationships, quality of the action process and outcomes, this scoping review examines if and how these factors have featured as quality criteria. While all studies included in this review reported on the four quality factors, no study reported in any detail on how any of the factors were integrated with one another. Findings therefore highlight a significant gap in the monitoring and reporting on the quality of action research studies. Addressing these gaps will support the development of future action research aimed at mitigating the lack of quality associated with action research approaches.","PeriodicalId":416587,"journal":{"name":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","volume":" February","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v20i1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Criteria for establishing the quality of action research is of increasing interest to researchers and practitioners however, it is not known how well these criteria are used. This review addresses this issue by appraising extant measures that assess quality in action research. Taking Coghlan and Shani’s (2014, 2018) four quality factors: context, quality of relationships, quality of the action process and outcomes, this scoping review examines if and how these factors have featured as quality criteria. While all studies included in this review reported on the four quality factors, no study reported in any detail on how any of the factors were integrated with one another. Findings therefore highlight a significant gap in the monitoring and reporting on the quality of action research studies. Addressing these gaps will support the development of future action research aimed at mitigating the lack of quality associated with action research approaches.
确定行动研究质量的标准越来越受到研究人员和从业人员的关注,然而,这些标准的使用情况如何却不得而知。本综述通过评估评估行动研究质量的现有措施来解决这一问题。根据科格兰和沙尼(Coghlan and Shani,2014 年,2018 年)提出的四个质量因素:背景、关系质量、行动过程质量和结果,本综述将研究这些因素是否以及如何成为质量标准。虽然本综述所包含的所有研究都报告了这四个质量因素,但没有一项研究详细报告了这些因素是如何相互融合的。因此,研究结果凸显了在监督和报告行动研究质量方面存在的巨大差距。弥补这些差距将有助于未来行动研究的发展,从而缓解行动研究方法质量不高的问题。