Port Site Local Anaesthetics Application Versus Standard Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Dr. Md. Shahidul Islam Khan, Dr. Md. Burhan Uddin Khan, Dr. Khadija Rahman, Dr. Shariful Islam Seraji, Dr. Md. Ashiqur Rahman
{"title":"Port Site Local Anaesthetics Application Versus Standard Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","authors":"Dr. Md. Shahidul Islam Khan, Dr. Md. Burhan Uddin Khan, Dr. Khadija Rahman, Dr. Shariful Islam Seraji, Dr. Md. Ashiqur Rahman","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of a diseased gallbladder which has different post-operative pain management systems. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare pain management in the port sites local anaesthetics and standard analgesics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methodology: A comparative study was conducted on 270 patients with LC under elective conditions for symptomatic cholelithiasis, with a mean age of 49±3.51, treated between 2021 and 2023 in the Department of Surgery at Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients were divided into the Local Anaesthetics Group (134 patients who received Local Anaesthetics through the port site) and the Standard Analgesia Group (136 patients who received postoperative analgesia with NSAIDs or tramadol). Pain was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in all patients at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperatively. Results: Both groups had similar demographic characteristics, surgery duration, and hospitalization. In the local anaesthetics group, the average pain scores at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours were 3.6, 4.4, 2.1, and 1.9, respectively. For the Standard Analgesia Group, the scores were 7.6, 6.9, 2.3, and 2.1. There was a significant reduction in pain intensity (p<0.001) in the local anaesthetics group at the 1st and 6th hours compared to the Standard Analgesia Group. However, there was no difference in pain intensity at the 12th and 24th hours. Additionally, the use of pain medication decreased significantly in the local anaesthetics group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that local anesthetic application to the port sites after LC provides a significant decrease in pain intensity in the first 6h postoperatively. The study also found that fewer analgesic drugs will be used for POP in these patients.","PeriodicalId":504829,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of a diseased gallbladder which has different post-operative pain management systems. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare pain management in the port sites local anaesthetics and standard analgesics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methodology: A comparative study was conducted on 270 patients with LC under elective conditions for symptomatic cholelithiasis, with a mean age of 49±3.51, treated between 2021 and 2023 in the Department of Surgery at Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients were divided into the Local Anaesthetics Group (134 patients who received Local Anaesthetics through the port site) and the Standard Analgesia Group (136 patients who received postoperative analgesia with NSAIDs or tramadol). Pain was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in all patients at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperatively. Results: Both groups had similar demographic characteristics, surgery duration, and hospitalization. In the local anaesthetics group, the average pain scores at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours were 3.6, 4.4, 2.1, and 1.9, respectively. For the Standard Analgesia Group, the scores were 7.6, 6.9, 2.3, and 2.1. There was a significant reduction in pain intensity (p<0.001) in the local anaesthetics group at the 1st and 6th hours compared to the Standard Analgesia Group. However, there was no difference in pain intensity at the 12th and 24th hours. Additionally, the use of pain medication decreased significantly in the local anaesthetics group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that local anesthetic application to the port sites after LC provides a significant decrease in pain intensity in the first 6h postoperatively. The study also found that fewer analgesic drugs will be used for POP in these patients.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛控制中的孔口局部麻醉剂应用与标准止痛剂对比
导言:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种切除病变胆囊的微创外科手术,术后疼痛处理系统各不相同。研究目的本研究旨在比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后端口部位局部麻醉剂和标准镇痛剂的疼痛管理。研究方法:本研究对孟加拉国达卡圣家红新月会医学院医院外科在 2021 年至 2023 年期间接受治疗的 270 名无症状胆石症择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者进行了比较研究,患者平均年龄(49±3.51)岁。患者被分为局麻药组(134 名患者通过端口部位接受局麻药)和标准镇痛组(136 名患者接受非甾体抗炎药或曲马多的术后镇痛)。所有患者在术后第 1、6、12 和 24 天均使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 测量疼痛。结果两组患者的人口统计学特征、手术时间和住院时间相似。局麻药组在术后第 1、6、12 和 24 小时的平均疼痛评分分别为 3.6、4.4、2.1 和 1.9。标准镇痛组的评分分别为 7.6、6.9、2.3 和 2.1。与标准镇痛组相比,局麻药组在第一和第六小时的疼痛强度明显降低(p<0.001)。然而,在第 12 小时和第 24 小时,疼痛强度没有差异。此外,局麻药组的镇痛药物使用量明显减少。结论这项研究表明,在 LC 术后 6 小时内,在移植口部位使用局麻药可显著降低疼痛强度。研究还发现,这些患者在治疗 POP 时使用的镇痛药物也会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信