Riba dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Komparatif Muhammad Abduh dan Quraish Shihab

AHKAM Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.58578/ahkam.v3i3.3328
Fandi Husain, Rizki Amar
{"title":"Riba dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Komparatif Muhammad Abduh dan Quraish Shihab","authors":"Fandi Husain, Rizki Amar","doi":"10.58578/ahkam.v3i3.3328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usury \"excess\" is a transaction that scholars firmly agree on its prohibition. The problem then is whether every double (adh'âfan mudh'afah) is categorised as usury, this then raises various interpretations by the mufassir both classical and contemporary scholars today. This research seeks to explore the concept of usury according to the understanding of Muhammad Abduh as the foundation of modern-contemporary tafsir and M. Quraish Shihab as a contemporary tafsir. This type of research is library research (librari reseach) with a descriptive-comparative research model, and focuses on tafsir Al-Manar and tafsir Al-Mishbah as primary sources. While tafsir books, articles-journals, dictionaries, web pages, as secondary sources. The results showed that Muhammad Abduh argued that usury is forbidden which is multiple and contains elements of exploitation as it happened in pre-Islamic times. And he allows usury that contains benefits. While M. Quraish Shihab interprets usury as \"excess\" which contains elements of persecution and oppression so it is prohibited. Both agree on the dangers posed by usury and even Shihab quotes Abduh's expression that the usurer can be considered a disbeliever.","PeriodicalId":504694,"journal":{"name":"AHKAM","volume":" 664","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHKAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v3i3.3328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Usury "excess" is a transaction that scholars firmly agree on its prohibition. The problem then is whether every double (adh'âfan mudh'afah) is categorised as usury, this then raises various interpretations by the mufassir both classical and contemporary scholars today. This research seeks to explore the concept of usury according to the understanding of Muhammad Abduh as the foundation of modern-contemporary tafsir and M. Quraish Shihab as a contemporary tafsir. This type of research is library research (librari reseach) with a descriptive-comparative research model, and focuses on tafsir Al-Manar and tafsir Al-Mishbah as primary sources. While tafsir books, articles-journals, dictionaries, web pages, as secondary sources. The results showed that Muhammad Abduh argued that usury is forbidden which is multiple and contains elements of exploitation as it happened in pre-Islamic times. And he allows usury that contains benefits. While M. Quraish Shihab interprets usury as "excess" which contains elements of persecution and oppression so it is prohibited. Both agree on the dangers posed by usury and even Shihab quotes Abduh's expression that the usurer can be considered a disbeliever.
古兰经》中的高利贷:穆罕默德-阿卜杜和古莱什-谢哈布的比较分析
高利贷 "超额 "是学者们一致同意禁止的交易。问题在于是否所有的双重(adh'âfan mudh'afah)都被归类为高利贷,这就引起了当今古典和当代学者对高利贷的各种解释。本研究试图根据穆罕默德-阿卜杜(Muhammad Abduh)作为现当代塔夫西尔(tafsir)的基础和古莱什-谢哈布(M. Quraish Shihab)作为当代塔夫西尔(tafsir)的理解来探讨高利贷的概念。此类研究属于图书馆研究(librari reseach),采用描述-比较研究模式,重点关注作为主要资料来源的《玛纳尔》和《米什巴》塔夫西尔。塔夫西尔》书籍、文章期刊、字典、网页则作为第二手资料。研究结果表明,穆罕默德-阿卜杜认为,高利贷是被禁止的,因为它是多重的,包含剥削的成分,就像伊斯兰教以前的时代一样。他允许包含利益的高利贷。而 M. Quraish Shihab 将高利贷解释为 "过度",含有迫害和压迫的成分,因此是禁止的。两人都同意高利贷带来的危险,甚至谢哈布还引用了阿卜杜勒的说法,即高利贷者可被视为不信教者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信