Siyi Lin, Sheng Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Yan Feng, Qihao Shi, Chun Chen, Ying Li, Can Wang
{"title":"ReCRec: Reasoning the Causes of Implicit Feedback for Debiased Recommendation","authors":"Siyi Lin, Sheng Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Yan Feng, Qihao Shi, Chun Chen, Ying Li, Can Wang","doi":"10.1145/3672275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Implicit feedback (\n e.g\n ., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious\n exposure bias\n significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results.\n \n \n To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method\n ReCRec\n that\n Re\n asons the\n C\n auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased\n Rec\n ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data —\n i.e.\n , unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.\n","PeriodicalId":50936,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3672275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Implicit feedback (
e.g
., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious
exposure bias
significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results.
To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method
ReCRec
that
Re
asons the
C
auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased
Rec
ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data —
i.e.
, unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.
期刊介绍:
The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain:
new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation;
observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking;
accounts of applications of existing information retrieval techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques;
formalization of new information retrieval or information seeking tasks and of methods for evaluating the performance on those tasks;
development of content (text, image, speech, video, etc) analysis methods to support information retrieval and information seeking;
development of computational models of user information preferences and interaction behaviors;
creation and analysis of evaluation methodologies for information retrieval and information seeking; or
surveys of existing work that propose a significant synthesis.
The information retrieval scope of ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) appeals to industry practitioners for its wealth of creative ideas, and to academic researchers for its descriptions of their colleagues'' work.