THE RISK THRESHOLD LEVEL JUSTIFICATION METHOD OF THE CRISIS SITUATIONS IN ORDER TO PREVENT ARMED AGGRESSION

V. Bogdanovych, V. Muzhenko, A. Tsybizov
{"title":"THE RISK THRESHOLD LEVEL JUSTIFICATION METHOD OF THE CRISIS SITUATIONS IN ORDER TO PREVENT ARMED AGGRESSION","authors":"V. Bogdanovych, V. Muzhenko, A. Tsybizov","doi":"10.37701/ts.03.2024.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The risk threshold level method of the crisis situations justification to prevent armed aggression against targeted state (with elements of artificial intelligence technology) has been developed, that ensures the integrated risks of crisis situations threshold levels determination. The method is based on the expert assessment and forecasting technologies and allows to track the dynamics of growth of destructive risks factors of negative trends in the development of the security environment and preventive response to the processes of ensuring the national security of the State in its defining areas by reducing the risks of the most dangerous negative trends that can provoke crisis situations in the targeted State. It is noted that since the target State has limited resources allocated to ensure national security, it makes no sense to fully consider all the identified negative trends (not all of them are aimed at the use of military force). Therefore, the method provides for the establishment of two threshold (critical) levels for each negative trend. The first level is the level of fixing the integral risk (if the negative trend has two or more destructive factors), upon reaching that the national security system organizes detailed monitoring of such a trend. The second level is the threshold level of of a crisis situation risk, at which crisis management is engaged in the system of ensuring national security. \nPractical implementation of the developed method will ensure a faster response to the risks of certain destructive factors for national security, which will make it possible to increase the efficiency of national security management under conditions of limited resources and expand preventive response to a wider range of negative trends in the geopolitical and military-political situation in the regions where targeted State's national interests are realized.","PeriodicalId":515274,"journal":{"name":"Випробування та сертифікація","volume":" 816","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Випробування та сертифікація","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.03.2024.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The risk threshold level method of the crisis situations justification to prevent armed aggression against targeted state (with elements of artificial intelligence technology) has been developed, that ensures the integrated risks of crisis situations threshold levels determination. The method is based on the expert assessment and forecasting technologies and allows to track the dynamics of growth of destructive risks factors of negative trends in the development of the security environment and preventive response to the processes of ensuring the national security of the State in its defining areas by reducing the risks of the most dangerous negative trends that can provoke crisis situations in the targeted State. It is noted that since the target State has limited resources allocated to ensure national security, it makes no sense to fully consider all the identified negative trends (not all of them are aimed at the use of military force). Therefore, the method provides for the establishment of two threshold (critical) levels for each negative trend. The first level is the level of fixing the integral risk (if the negative trend has two or more destructive factors), upon reaching that the national security system organizes detailed monitoring of such a trend. The second level is the threshold level of of a crisis situation risk, at which crisis management is engaged in the system of ensuring national security. Practical implementation of the developed method will ensure a faster response to the risks of certain destructive factors for national security, which will make it possible to increase the efficiency of national security management under conditions of limited resources and expand preventive response to a wider range of negative trends in the geopolitical and military-political situation in the regions where targeted State's national interests are realized.
为防止武装侵略,对危机局势的风险阈值水平进行论证的方法
为防止针对目标国家的武装侵略,开发了危机局势风险阈值等级理由法(含人工智能技术元素),以确保确定危机局势阈值等级的综合风险。该方法以专家评估和预测技术为基础,可以跟踪安全环境发展中负面趋势的破坏性风险因素的增长动态,并通过降低可能在目标国引发危机局势的最危险负面趋势的风险,对确保国家在其确定领域的国家安全进程做出预防性反应。需要指出的是,由于目标国用于确保国家安全的资源有限,完全考虑所有已查明的负面趋势毫无意义(并非所有趋势都以使用军事力量为目的)。因此,该方法规定为每个消极趋势确定两个临界(关键)水平。第一级是确定整体风险的级别(如果消极趋势有两个或两个以上的破坏性因素),达到这一级别后,国家安全系统将对这一趋势进行详细监测。第二级是危机情况风险的临界水平,在这一水平上,国家安全保障系统将进行危机管理。实际执行所制定的方法将确保对国家安全面临的某些破坏性因素的风险做出更快的反应,从而有可能在资源有限的条件下提高国家安全管理的效率,并扩大预防性反应的范围,以应对目标国家的国家利益所在地区的地缘政治和军事政治局势中出现的更广泛的负面趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信