Soil application of high-lignin fermentation byproduct to increase the sustainability of liquid biofuel production from crop residues

Lee R Lynd, A. Kemanian, Jo U Smith, Tom L Richard, Anela Arifi, Stefano Bozzetto, Claudio Fabbri, John L Field, Caitlin Hicks Pries, Matt Kubis, Pete Smith, Michelle Wang, Madeline Hoey
{"title":"Soil application of high-lignin fermentation byproduct to increase the sustainability of liquid biofuel production from crop residues","authors":"Lee R Lynd, A. Kemanian, Jo U Smith, Tom L Richard, Anela Arifi, Stefano Bozzetto, Claudio Fabbri, John L Field, Caitlin Hicks Pries, Matt Kubis, Pete Smith, Michelle Wang, Madeline Hoey","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad601a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When digestates from anaerobic digestion of crop residues are added to soil, a considerable body of information indicates that soil organic carbon (SOC) levels are comparable to those when crop residues are left in the field. This occurs although the amount of digestate added to soil is diminished by digestion and implies that digestion increases the proportion of carbon inputs stabilized as SOC. Here we examine the likelihood and implications of these features being manifested for soil application of high lignin-fermentation byproduct (HLFB) from liquid biofuel production. We show that steady-state SOC levels are much less sensitive to crop residue removal with HLFB return than without it, and provide an example supporting the feasibility of foregoing process energy and coproduct revenue when HLFB is returned to the soil. Informed by this review and analysis, we expect with moderate confidence that long-term SOC levels for soils amended with HLFB from some liquid cellulosic biofuel processes will be similar to those occurring when crop residues are left in the field. We have high confidence that the economically optimum rate of fertilizer nitrogen (N) application and N2O emissions will be lower at most sites for HLFB return to the soil than if crop residues were left in the field. We estimate that the per hectare N demand for processing crop residues to liquid biofuels is about a third of the per hectare demand for crop production, giving rise to an opportunity to use N twice and thereby realize cost savings and environmental benefits. These observations support but do not prove the hypothesis that a \"win-win\" is possible wherein large amounts of liquid biofuel feedstock can be obtained from crop residues while improving the economics and sustainability of food and feed production. A research agenda aimed at exploring and testing this hypothesis is offered.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad601a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When digestates from anaerobic digestion of crop residues are added to soil, a considerable body of information indicates that soil organic carbon (SOC) levels are comparable to those when crop residues are left in the field. This occurs although the amount of digestate added to soil is diminished by digestion and implies that digestion increases the proportion of carbon inputs stabilized as SOC. Here we examine the likelihood and implications of these features being manifested for soil application of high lignin-fermentation byproduct (HLFB) from liquid biofuel production. We show that steady-state SOC levels are much less sensitive to crop residue removal with HLFB return than without it, and provide an example supporting the feasibility of foregoing process energy and coproduct revenue when HLFB is returned to the soil. Informed by this review and analysis, we expect with moderate confidence that long-term SOC levels for soils amended with HLFB from some liquid cellulosic biofuel processes will be similar to those occurring when crop residues are left in the field. We have high confidence that the economically optimum rate of fertilizer nitrogen (N) application and N2O emissions will be lower at most sites for HLFB return to the soil than if crop residues were left in the field. We estimate that the per hectare N demand for processing crop residues to liquid biofuels is about a third of the per hectare demand for crop production, giving rise to an opportunity to use N twice and thereby realize cost savings and environmental benefits. These observations support but do not prove the hypothesis that a "win-win" is possible wherein large amounts of liquid biofuel feedstock can be obtained from crop residues while improving the economics and sustainability of food and feed production. A research agenda aimed at exploring and testing this hypothesis is offered.
在土壤中施用高木质素发酵副产品,提高利用作物秸秆生产液体生物燃料的可持续性
大量信息表明,将厌氧消化农作物秸秆产生的沼渣添加到土壤中后,土壤有机碳(SOC)水平与农作物秸秆留在田间的水平相当。尽管加入土壤中的沼渣量会因消化而减少,但这种情况仍然存在,这意味着消化增加了稳定为 SOC 的碳输入比例。在此,我们研究了这些特征在液体生物燃料生产过程中产生的高木质素发酵副产品(HLFB)的土壤应用中表现出来的可能性和影响。我们的研究表明,在 HLFB 返回土壤的情况下,稳态 SOC 水平对作物残留物清除的敏感性远低于不清除残留物的情况,并提供了一个实例,支持在 HLFB 返回土壤时放弃加工能源和副产品收入的可行性。根据上述回顾和分析,我们有中等信心认为,使用某些液体纤维素生物燃料工艺产生的 HLFB 改良土壤的长期 SOC 水平将与作物残留物留在田间时的 SOC 水平相似。我们很有信心地认为,在大多数地点,HLFB 返回土壤的经济上最佳的氮肥施用量和 N2O 排放量将低于作物残留物留在田间的情况。我们估计,将农作物秸秆加工成液体生物燃料的每公顷氮需求量约为农作物生产每公顷需求量的三分之一,因此有机会两次使用氮,从而实现成本节约和环境效益。这些观察结果支持但不能证明 "双赢 "的假设,即可以从作物秸秆中获得大量液体生物燃料原料,同时改善粮食和饲料生产的经济性和可持续性。本文提出了旨在探索和检验这一假设的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信