External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Plane Block in Supra-umbilical Surgical Incisions; Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Mona Gad, Ahmed M. Kandel, Ahmed F. Abd-Ellatief, Zenat Eldadamony Mohamed Eldadamony
{"title":"External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Plane Block in Supra-umbilical Surgical Incisions; Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Clinical Trial","authors":"Mona Gad, Ahmed M. Kandel, Ahmed F. Abd-Ellatief, Zenat Eldadamony Mohamed Eldadamony","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2024.285088.1960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: Surgical repair for supraumbilical hernias is a common surgical procedure that is often associated with significant post-operative pain. Some regional blocks have been described to alleviate pain after such procedures, including the \"rectus sheath block\"[RSB] and \"external oblique intercostal plane block\" [EOIPB]. Aim of the work: To compare the analgesic effects of RSB and EOIPB in patients undergoing procedures through upper midline laparotomies. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized trial included 75 patients who were assigned into three groups: RSB group where the local anesthetic mixture [5 ml lidocaine 2%, 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25%, and 5 ml normal saline] was injected into the plane deep to the posterolateral muscle aspect, EOIPB group the same anesthetic mixture was delivered deep to the EOM and superficial to the ribs and intercostal musculature, and control group with no block Results: Preoperative parameters and operative time comparable in three groups of study. VAS during rest in both blocks were significantly lower compared to control group at all time points. The two block groups had comparable pain scores at the initial two readings. VAS during cough [or movement] showed similar findings. The patients requiring rescue opioid analgesia was lower in two block groups. The duration to the first rescue analgesia was in favor of the two block groups. The 24-hour morphine consumption had the lowest value in the EOIPB group, followed by the RSB group, the control group had the highest consumption. Conclusion: EOIPB is associated with better postoperative analgesia compared to the RSB. It is recommended that the former block be performed in such cases to enhance postoperative outcomes.","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2024.285088.1960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: Surgical repair for supraumbilical hernias is a common surgical procedure that is often associated with significant post-operative pain. Some regional blocks have been described to alleviate pain after such procedures, including the "rectus sheath block"[RSB] and "external oblique intercostal plane block" [EOIPB]. Aim of the work: To compare the analgesic effects of RSB and EOIPB in patients undergoing procedures through upper midline laparotomies. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized trial included 75 patients who were assigned into three groups: RSB group where the local anesthetic mixture [5 ml lidocaine 2%, 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25%, and 5 ml normal saline] was injected into the plane deep to the posterolateral muscle aspect, EOIPB group the same anesthetic mixture was delivered deep to the EOM and superficial to the ribs and intercostal musculature, and control group with no block Results: Preoperative parameters and operative time comparable in three groups of study. VAS during rest in both blocks were significantly lower compared to control group at all time points. The two block groups had comparable pain scores at the initial two readings. VAS during cough [or movement] showed similar findings. The patients requiring rescue opioid analgesia was lower in two block groups. The duration to the first rescue analgesia was in favor of the two block groups. The 24-hour morphine consumption had the lowest value in the EOIPB group, followed by the RSB group, the control group had the highest consumption. Conclusion: EOIPB is associated with better postoperative analgesia compared to the RSB. It is recommended that the former block be performed in such cases to enhance postoperative outcomes.
脐上手术切口中的肋间外斜平面阻滞与直肠鞘平面阻滞;随机对照双盲临床试验
文章信息 背景:脐上疝的手术修补是一种常见的外科手术,通常伴有明显的术后疼痛。一些区域阻滞疗法可减轻此类手术后的疼痛,包括 "直肌鞘阻滞"[RSB] 和 "肋间外斜平面阻滞"[EOIPB]。工作目的比较 RSB 和 EOIPB 对经中线上开腹手术患者的镇痛效果。患者和方法:这项前瞻性随机试验将 75 名患者分为三组:RSB组:将局麻药混合物[5毫升2%利多卡因、10毫升0.25%布比卡因和5毫升生理盐水]注射到后外侧肌肉深面;EOIPB组:将相同的麻醉混合物注射到EOM深面和肋骨及肋间肌浅面;对照组:不进行阻滞:三组研究的术前参数和手术时间相当。与对照组相比,两个阻滞组在所有时间点的休息时的 VAS 均明显降低。两个阻滞组在最初两次读数时的疼痛评分相当。咳嗽[或运动]时的 VAS 显示出相似的结果。两个阻滞组中需要阿片类药物镇痛抢救的患者人数较少。首次抢救性镇痛的持续时间在两个阻滞组中更长。EOIPB 组的 24 小时吗啡消耗量最低,其次是 RSB 组,而对照组的消耗量最高。结论与 RSB 相比,EOIPB 术后镇痛效果更好。建议在此类病例中采用前者进行阻滞,以提高术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信