“Fast but not so furious”: A condensed step-up dosing schedule of teclistamab for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1002/jha2.906
Kevin C. Graf, James A Davis, Alyssa Cendagorta, Katelynn Granger, Kelly J. Gaffney, Kimberly Green, Brian T Hess, Hamza Hashmi
{"title":"“Fast but not so furious”: A condensed step-up dosing schedule of teclistamab for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma","authors":"Kevin C. Graf,&nbsp;James A Davis,&nbsp;Alyssa Cendagorta,&nbsp;Katelynn Granger,&nbsp;Kelly J. Gaffney,&nbsp;Kimberly Green,&nbsp;Brian T Hess,&nbsp;Hamza Hashmi","doi":"10.1002/jha2.906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific T-cell engager approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well-documented treatment -related adverse events of teclistamab. The prescribing information recommends step-up dosing on days 1, 4, and 7 with 48–72 h of inpatient observation after each dose to monitor for CRS. This leads to a more than weeklong hospital stay, adding to the cost of therapy, resource utilization, and patient inconvenience. Here, we present a single center retrospective analysis addressing the safety and utility of a condensed step-up dosing schedule for teclistamab. All patients who were treated with teclistamab from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Medical University of South Carolina were included in the analysis. Patients received subcutaneous (SC) teclistamab with step-up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg) separated by either 2 or 3 (48–72 h) before the administration of the first full (1.5 mg/kg) dose (days 1, 3, and 5 ‘condensed’ schedule or days 1, 4, and 7 ‘standard’ schedule, respectively). All patients were hospitalized for the two step-up doses and first full dose of teclistamab and received pre-medications prior to each dose. Patients could be discharged after a minimum of 24 h following the full dose, if they did not have any CRS or ICANS. Relevant data regarding incidence, severity, and onset of CRS was collected. Statistical analysis was completed to assess the probability of fever with the first full dose of teclistamab based on incidence of fever with previous doses. A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (7/25) of patients underwent the standard step up while the remaining 72% (18/25) underwent a condensed step up of teclistamab. More than half (53%, 13/25) of the patients experienced CRS during step up dosing. Grades 1 and 2 CRS occurred in 48% (12/25) and 4% (1/25) patients, respectively. Of the 13 patients that experienced CRS, 30% (4/13) fevered with the first dose, 84% (11/13) fevered with the second dose, and one patient developed fever after the third dose. The negative predictive value of being ‘fever free’ after doses 1 and 2 and remaining ‘fever free’ throughout hospitalization was 0.92. The median length of hospital stay among the 1, 3, and 5 step up group was 6 days (6–25) and 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged from the hospital within 7 days of treatment initiation. This report demonstrates the utility of a condensed step-up schedule for teclistamab initiation. The schedule was found to be safe and reduced hospital length of stay. These results should prompt consideration of shorter hospital stays for patients who do not experience CRS and raise the possibility of outpatient administration with close observation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"5 4","pages":"793-797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific T-cell engager approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well-documented treatment -related adverse events of teclistamab. The prescribing information recommends step-up dosing on days 1, 4, and 7 with 48–72 h of inpatient observation after each dose to monitor for CRS. This leads to a more than weeklong hospital stay, adding to the cost of therapy, resource utilization, and patient inconvenience. Here, we present a single center retrospective analysis addressing the safety and utility of a condensed step-up dosing schedule for teclistamab. All patients who were treated with teclistamab from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Medical University of South Carolina were included in the analysis. Patients received subcutaneous (SC) teclistamab with step-up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg) separated by either 2 or 3 (48–72 h) before the administration of the first full (1.5 mg/kg) dose (days 1, 3, and 5 ‘condensed’ schedule or days 1, 4, and 7 ‘standard’ schedule, respectively). All patients were hospitalized for the two step-up doses and first full dose of teclistamab and received pre-medications prior to each dose. Patients could be discharged after a minimum of 24 h following the full dose, if they did not have any CRS or ICANS. Relevant data regarding incidence, severity, and onset of CRS was collected. Statistical analysis was completed to assess the probability of fever with the first full dose of teclistamab based on incidence of fever with previous doses. A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (7/25) of patients underwent the standard step up while the remaining 72% (18/25) underwent a condensed step up of teclistamab. More than half (53%, 13/25) of the patients experienced CRS during step up dosing. Grades 1 and 2 CRS occurred in 48% (12/25) and 4% (1/25) patients, respectively. Of the 13 patients that experienced CRS, 30% (4/13) fevered with the first dose, 84% (11/13) fevered with the second dose, and one patient developed fever after the third dose. The negative predictive value of being ‘fever free’ after doses 1 and 2 and remaining ‘fever free’ throughout hospitalization was 0.92. The median length of hospital stay among the 1, 3, and 5 step up group was 6 days (6–25) and 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged from the hospital within 7 days of treatment initiation. This report demonstrates the utility of a condensed step-up schedule for teclistamab initiation. The schedule was found to be safe and reduced hospital length of stay. These results should prompt consideration of shorter hospital stays for patients who do not experience CRS and raise the possibility of outpatient administration with close observation.

Abstract Image

"快而不乱":特克司他单抗治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的简化阶梯给药方案
泰克单抗是一种B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)导向的双特异性T细胞吸引剂,已被批准用于治疗复发性-难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是特克司他单抗治疗相关不良事件的确凿证据。处方信息建议在第1、4和7天加大剂量,每次给药后住院观察48-72小时,以监测CRS。这导致住院时间超过一周,增加了治疗成本、资源利用率和患者的不便。在此,我们介绍了一项单中心回顾性分析,探讨了替卡单抗浓缩阶梯给药方案的安全性和实用性。分析纳入了2022年11月至2023年8月期间在南卡罗来纳医科大学接受替卡单抗治疗的所有患者。患者接受皮下注射(SC)替卡单抗,阶梯剂量(0.06和0.3毫克/千克)与首次全剂量(1.5毫克/千克)间隔2或3(48-72小时)(分别为第1、3和5天 "浓缩 "计划或第1、4和7天 "标准 "计划)。所有患者均住院接受两次递增剂量和第一次全剂量替卡司他单抗治疗,并在每次用药前接受预处理。如果患者没有出现任何CRS或ICANS,则可在用完全量后至少24小时后出院。收集了有关 CRS 发生率、严重程度和发病时间的相关数据。根据前几次用药的发热发生率,完成了统计分析,以评估首次全剂量使用替卡司他单抗时的发热概率。共有25名患者被纳入分析。28%的患者(7/25)接受了标准剂量的阶梯治疗,其余72%的患者(18/25)接受了特克司他单抗的简化阶梯治疗。半数以上(53%,13/25)的患者在阶梯用药期间出现了CRS。1级和2级CRS分别发生在48%(12/25)和4%(1/25)的患者中。在出现 CRS 的 13 名患者中,30%(4/13)在第一次用药时发烧,84%(11/13)在第二次用药时发烧,一名患者在第三次用药后发烧。第一剂和第二剂后 "无发热 "并在整个住院期间保持 "无发热 "的阴性预测值为 0.92。第 1、3 和 5 步组的中位住院时间为 6 天(6-25 天),70% 的患者(14/20)在治疗开始后 7 天内出院。本报告证明了替卡司他单抗简化阶梯计划的实用性。该计划不仅安全,而且缩短了住院时间。这些结果应促使人们考虑缩短未出现 CRS 的患者的住院时间,并提出了在密切观察的情况下进行门诊治疗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信