Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a feasible and safe choice for primary hepatocellular carcinoma located at favorable location during the development period of a tertiary hospital: A case–control study

Yi-Hsuan Lee, Yu-Ting Huang, Tsai-Ling Kuo, Ming-Che Lee, Yen-Cheng Chen
{"title":"Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a feasible and safe choice for primary hepatocellular carcinoma located at favorable location during the development period of a tertiary hospital: A case–control study","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Lee, Yu-Ting Huang, Tsai-Ling Kuo, Ming-Che Lee, Yen-Cheng Chen","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_5_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well known for its advantages in the past 10 years, but little is known regarding its oncologic outcomes while the technique is being developed at an institution. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LH for patients with primary HCC at favorable locations, focusing on postoperative short- and long-term outcomes during the development period.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with primary HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2013 and December 2019 at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital. Patients with HCC at favorable locations (anterolateral segments) were collected and divided into laparoscopic and open hepatectomy (OH) groups. The data for long-term outcomes, as the primary endpoint, and postoperative outcomes, as the secondary endpoint, were collected.\n \n \n \n The review included 159 patients, among which 42 and 44 patients in favorable locations underwent open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, respectively. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, major complication rate, and 90-day mortality rate between the two groups. The laparoscopic group had a lower transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower 90-day readmission rate. There were no significant differences in 12-, 36-, and 60-month overall survival and disease-free survival.\n \n \n \n LH for favorably located HCC is the preferred surgical approach compared to OH due to the decreased transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower 90-day readmission rate. LH did not compromise the 90-day mortality rate with sustained long-term overall and disease-free survival. LH for favorably located HCC is a safe and effective surgical approach even during the development period.\n","PeriodicalId":507485,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"113 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_5_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well known for its advantages in the past 10 years, but little is known regarding its oncologic outcomes while the technique is being developed at an institution. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LH for patients with primary HCC at favorable locations, focusing on postoperative short- and long-term outcomes during the development period. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with primary HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2013 and December 2019 at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital. Patients with HCC at favorable locations (anterolateral segments) were collected and divided into laparoscopic and open hepatectomy (OH) groups. The data for long-term outcomes, as the primary endpoint, and postoperative outcomes, as the secondary endpoint, were collected. The review included 159 patients, among which 42 and 44 patients in favorable locations underwent open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, respectively. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, major complication rate, and 90-day mortality rate between the two groups. The laparoscopic group had a lower transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower 90-day readmission rate. There were no significant differences in 12-, 36-, and 60-month overall survival and disease-free survival. LH for favorably located HCC is the preferred surgical approach compared to OH due to the decreased transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower 90-day readmission rate. LH did not compromise the 90-day mortality rate with sustained long-term overall and disease-free survival. LH for favorably located HCC is a safe and effective surgical approach even during the development period.
在一家三级医院的发展时期,腹腔镜肝切除术是治疗位于有利位置的原发性肝细胞癌的可行且安全的选择:病例对照研究
摘要 在过去的 10 年中,腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的优势已广为人知,但对于该技术在医疗机构发展期间的肿瘤治疗效果却知之甚少。本研究旨在评估 LH 在有利位置对原发性 HCC 患者的安全性和有效性,重点关注发展期的术后短期和长期疗效。 我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2019年12月期间在花莲慈济医院接受肝切除术的原发性HCC患者。我们收集了HCC位于有利位置(前外侧段)的患者,并将其分为腹腔镜组和开腹肝切除术(OH)组。收集了作为主要终点的长期疗效数据和作为次要终点的术后疗效数据。 该研究共纳入159名患者,其中42名和44名位置较好的患者分别接受了开腹和腹腔镜肝切除术。两组患者在术中失血量、主要并发症发生率和90天死亡率方面没有明显差异。腹腔镜组的输血率较低,术后住院时间较短,90天再入院率较低。两组在12个月、36个月和60个月的总生存率和无病生存率上没有明显差异。 由于输血率降低、术后住院时间缩短、90天再入院率降低,LH与OH相比是治疗位置有利的HCC的首选手术方法。LH不会降低90天死亡率,并能维持长期的总生存率和无病生存率。LH治疗位置良好的HCC是一种安全有效的手术方法,即使在发展期也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信