Teaching of reflection in higher education: a narrative review

MedEdPublish Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.12688/mep.20389.1
Tharin Phenwan
{"title":"Teaching of reflection in higher education: a narrative review","authors":"Tharin Phenwan","doi":"10.12688/mep.20389.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Healthcare professional students (HCPs) are encouraged to utilise reflection during and after their study programmes as a part of their life-long learning skill and professional competencies. However, the way in which the concept of reflection is taught and its’ influence students’ capacity to reflect have not been fully explored. This narrative review aimed to explore how the concept of reflection is taught in higher education and how the teaching of reflection influences HCP students’ capacity to reflect. Methods Articles that were published during 2014–2024 within three databases, PubMed, CINAHL and ERIC were searched. 1929 articles were eligible for screening. 93 articles were further assessed for eligibility. Results 18 articles were included. The included articles were geographically well-distributed in both the Global North and Global South countries, indicating universal interest in the topic. Eight articles had qualitative study designs; six had quantitative designs and four had mixed-method designs. Conceptually, the teaching of reflection could be categorised as a spectrum, ranging from: i) structured format (reflective templates or debriefing); ii) semi-structured format (physical/virtual small group discussions, video recordings, AI generative arts, in-verse reflection and concept mapping) and iii) flexible and creative (art-based pedagogy or narratives). All included articles indicated students actual and perceived better understanding of reflection. This claim is supported both quantitatively and qualitatively via either validated instruments or narratives and themes based on students’ textual outputs. Conclusions This review identified several teaching methods that help facilitating students’ capacity to reflect. Findings are unable to recommend the most efficient way to teach reflection since it depends on students’ progress in their programmes. However, a more relational approach to teaching of reflection is recommended. Students might begin their reflective journey with a structured format of teaching of reflection then gradually move to less-rigid format of the teaching to empower students’ autonomy.","PeriodicalId":510301,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish","volume":"101 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20389.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Healthcare professional students (HCPs) are encouraged to utilise reflection during and after their study programmes as a part of their life-long learning skill and professional competencies. However, the way in which the concept of reflection is taught and its’ influence students’ capacity to reflect have not been fully explored. This narrative review aimed to explore how the concept of reflection is taught in higher education and how the teaching of reflection influences HCP students’ capacity to reflect. Methods Articles that were published during 2014–2024 within three databases, PubMed, CINAHL and ERIC were searched. 1929 articles were eligible for screening. 93 articles were further assessed for eligibility. Results 18 articles were included. The included articles were geographically well-distributed in both the Global North and Global South countries, indicating universal interest in the topic. Eight articles had qualitative study designs; six had quantitative designs and four had mixed-method designs. Conceptually, the teaching of reflection could be categorised as a spectrum, ranging from: i) structured format (reflective templates or debriefing); ii) semi-structured format (physical/virtual small group discussions, video recordings, AI generative arts, in-verse reflection and concept mapping) and iii) flexible and creative (art-based pedagogy or narratives). All included articles indicated students actual and perceived better understanding of reflection. This claim is supported both quantitatively and qualitatively via either validated instruments or narratives and themes based on students’ textual outputs. Conclusions This review identified several teaching methods that help facilitating students’ capacity to reflect. Findings are unable to recommend the most efficient way to teach reflection since it depends on students’ progress in their programmes. However, a more relational approach to teaching of reflection is recommended. Students might begin their reflective journey with a structured format of teaching of reflection then gradually move to less-rigid format of the teaching to empower students’ autonomy.
高等教育中的反思教学:叙事回顾
背景 我们鼓励医护专业学生(HCPs)在学习期间和学习结束后进行反思,这是他们终身学习技能和专业能力的一部分。然而,反思概念的教学方式及其对学生反思能力的影响尚未得到充分探讨。本叙述性综述旨在探讨高等教育中如何教授反思概念,以及反思教学如何影响高职高专学生的反思能力。方法 在 PubMed、CINAHL 和 ERIC 三个数据库中搜索 2014-2024 年间发表的文章。1929篇文章符合筛选条件。对 93 篇文章进行了进一步的资格评估。结果 共纳入 18 篇文章。所收录的文章在地域上广泛分布于全球北方国家和全球南方国家,表明了人们对这一主题的普遍兴趣。八篇文章采用了定性研究设计;六篇文章采用了定量设计,四篇文章采用了混合方法设计。从概念上讲,反思教学可分为多种类型,包括:i) 结构化形式(反思模板或汇报);ii) 半结构化形式(实体/虚拟小组讨论、视频录像、人工智能生成艺术、逆向反思和概念图);iii) 灵活和创造性(艺术教学法或叙事)。所有收录的文章都表明,学生实际和感知到对反思有了更好的理解。这种说法通过经过验证的工具或基于学生文本输出的叙述和主题得到了定量和定性的支持。结论 本综述确定了几种有助于提高学生反思能力的教学方法。研究结果无法推荐最有效的反思教学方法,因为这取决于学生的课程进度。不过,建议采用一种更具关系性的反思教学方法。学生可以从结构化的反思教学形式开始他们的反思之旅,然后逐渐过渡到不那么僵化的教学形式,以增强学生的自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书