Study of the Performance of an Indirect Forced Convection Solar Dryer Incorporating a Thermal Energy Storage Device on a Granite Bed for Drying Tomatoes

Salifou Tera, Souleymane Sinon, Sié Kam, Haro Kayaba, Ourmar Sanogo, Benoit Stutz
{"title":"Study of the Performance of an Indirect Forced Convection Solar Dryer Incorporating a Thermal Energy Storage Device on a Granite Bed for Drying Tomatoes","authors":"Salifou Tera, Souleymane Sinon, Sié Kam, Haro Kayaba, Ourmar Sanogo, Benoit Stutz","doi":"10.9734/cjast/2024/v43i74411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indirect solar dryers combining a solar collector and an enclosure enable the drying process to be run smoothly, with good quality dried products. However, when the process lasts longer than one day, some of the products may be damaged when the drying process is interrupted. The integration of a thermal storage system into indirect solar dryer systems can make up for the unavailability of solar energy and enable the drying process to continue over longer periods without the need for additional energy. With this in mind, the present study investigates the performance of a forced convection indirect solar dryer coupled with a thermal energy accumulator for drying tomatoes. The experiments were carried out with a drying air flow rate of 0.01 kg/s during the drying period. The air flow rate during storage tank charging was 0.013 kg/s. Solar drying performance with and without storage was compared. The results show that to reduce the water content in the dry tomato base from 16.78 kgwater/kgms to 0.125 kgwater/kgms, the indirect solar dryer requires 15 hours of cumulative sunshine spread over two drying days, while the indirect solar dryer coupled with the heat accumulator enables the water content in the dry base to be reduced from 19.81 kgwater/kgms to 0.117 kgwater/kgms over 17 continuous hours, i.e. approximately one sunny day and one night. The overall average efficiency of the indirect solar dryer with heat storage is around 23.31%, compared with 17.47% for the indirect solar dryer.","PeriodicalId":505676,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"81 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2024/v43i74411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indirect solar dryers combining a solar collector and an enclosure enable the drying process to be run smoothly, with good quality dried products. However, when the process lasts longer than one day, some of the products may be damaged when the drying process is interrupted. The integration of a thermal storage system into indirect solar dryer systems can make up for the unavailability of solar energy and enable the drying process to continue over longer periods without the need for additional energy. With this in mind, the present study investigates the performance of a forced convection indirect solar dryer coupled with a thermal energy accumulator for drying tomatoes. The experiments were carried out with a drying air flow rate of 0.01 kg/s during the drying period. The air flow rate during storage tank charging was 0.013 kg/s. Solar drying performance with and without storage was compared. The results show that to reduce the water content in the dry tomato base from 16.78 kgwater/kgms to 0.125 kgwater/kgms, the indirect solar dryer requires 15 hours of cumulative sunshine spread over two drying days, while the indirect solar dryer coupled with the heat accumulator enables the water content in the dry base to be reduced from 19.81 kgwater/kgms to 0.117 kgwater/kgms over 17 continuous hours, i.e. approximately one sunny day and one night. The overall average efficiency of the indirect solar dryer with heat storage is around 23.31%, compared with 17.47% for the indirect solar dryer.
研究在花岗岩床中安装热能储存装置的间接强制对流太阳能干燥器在干燥西红柿方面的性能
间接太阳能干燥器由太阳能集热器和外壳组成,可使干燥过程顺利进行,并获得优质的干燥产品。但是,如果干燥过程持续时间超过一天,干燥过程中断时可能会损坏部分产品。在间接太阳能干燥系统中集成蓄热系统可以弥补太阳能的不足,使干燥过程能够持续更长时间,而无需额外的能源。有鉴于此,本研究对带有热能储存器的强制对流间接太阳能干燥器的性能进行了调查,以干燥西红柿。实验在干燥期间以 0.01 公斤/秒的干燥空气流速进行。储气罐充气时的空气流速为 0.013 千克/秒。比较了有储存和无储存的太阳能干燥性能。结果表明,要将干番茄基质中的含水量从 16.78 千克水/千克毫升降至 0.125 千克水/千克毫升,间接太阳能干燥器需要在两个干燥日内累计日照 15 个小时,而间接太阳能干燥器加上蓄热器可在连续 17 个小时(即大约一个晴天和一个夜晚)内将干基质中的含水量从 19.81 千克水/千克毫升降至 0.117 千克水/千克毫升。带蓄热器的间接太阳能干燥器的总体平均效率约为 23.31%,而间接太阳能干燥器的效率仅为 17.47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信