The non-intervention principle and disclosure of information to beneficiaries: recent Jersey cases

Stephen Alexander, Andrew Bridgeford
{"title":"The non-intervention principle and disclosure of information to beneficiaries: recent Jersey cases","authors":"Stephen Alexander, Andrew Bridgeford","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent Jersey cases affirm the importance of the non-intervention principle, namely, that the court will not interfere before the trustees have acted to compel a particular exercise of power and that after they have acted it will not overturn their exercise of the power. A question not definitively settled is whether a trustee’s decision concerning the disclosure of trust information to a beneficiary constitutes an exception or whether the court’s role remains a more limited review. Two recent Jersey cases favour the former approach, and this jurisprudence is likely to be influential across other trust jurisdictions where the position has likewise not been decided.","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"62 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttae052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent Jersey cases affirm the importance of the non-intervention principle, namely, that the court will not interfere before the trustees have acted to compel a particular exercise of power and that after they have acted it will not overturn their exercise of the power. A question not definitively settled is whether a trustee’s decision concerning the disclosure of trust information to a beneficiary constitutes an exception or whether the court’s role remains a more limited review. Two recent Jersey cases favour the former approach, and this jurisprudence is likely to be influential across other trust jurisdictions where the position has likewise not been decided.
不干涉原则和向受益人披露信息:泽西岛最近的案例
泽西岛最近的案例肯定了不干预原则的重要性,即在受托人采取行动强制行使某项权力之前,法院不会干预,而在受托人采取行动之后,法院也不会推翻他们行使权力的行为。一个尚未明确解决的问题是,受托人关于向受益人披露信托信息的决定是否构成例外,或者法院的作用是否仍然是更有限的审查。泽西岛最近的两个案例倾向于前者,而这一判例很可能会对其他信托管辖区产生影响,因为这些管辖区的立场同样尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信