Government spending in the agricultural sector: Optimal ratio with lending and the impact on the agricultural production

Bayali Atashov, Sabina Valiyeva, Nizami Gafarov
{"title":"Government spending in the agricultural sector: Optimal ratio with lending and the impact on the agricultural production","authors":"Bayali Atashov, Sabina Valiyeva, Nizami Gafarov","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An effective government agropolicy should be balanced: To reduce the state budget pressure, it is important to reduce public spending and encourage farmers to use agricultural loans. Reducing public spending should not lead to a shortage in the agricultural market. The paper aims to substantiate the directions of government agropolicy transformation based on the optimal ratio of public expenditures and loans in the agrosector and the dependence of agroproduction dynamics on state financing. The research base is data from 10 countries with different income levels (World Bank), presented in FAOSTAT for 2004–2021. For each country, the optimal (determined by the structural modeling method) and actual proportions between state financing and lending in the agrosector are compared, adjusted for the agroproduction index. The modeling showed that the share of public funds should increase in Germany, Israel, Italy, and the UK and decrease in Azerbaijan and Georgia; the current proportion is optimal in the USA, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Based on a panel regression model with fixed effects, the influence of the actual level of state agrofinancing on the FAO Production Indices of the main types of agroproducts was determined. It is the largest for crops, meat, and milk (a decrease in state funding by USD 1 million threatens to reduce the respective indices by 4.5, 3.47, and 3.79 points), medium for cereals and sugar crops (according to points 2.69 and 2.11), and the smallest for livestock and non-food products (by 1.53 and 0.001 points, respectively).","PeriodicalId":509767,"journal":{"name":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An effective government agropolicy should be balanced: To reduce the state budget pressure, it is important to reduce public spending and encourage farmers to use agricultural loans. Reducing public spending should not lead to a shortage in the agricultural market. The paper aims to substantiate the directions of government agropolicy transformation based on the optimal ratio of public expenditures and loans in the agrosector and the dependence of agroproduction dynamics on state financing. The research base is data from 10 countries with different income levels (World Bank), presented in FAOSTAT for 2004–2021. For each country, the optimal (determined by the structural modeling method) and actual proportions between state financing and lending in the agrosector are compared, adjusted for the agroproduction index. The modeling showed that the share of public funds should increase in Germany, Israel, Italy, and the UK and decrease in Azerbaijan and Georgia; the current proportion is optimal in the USA, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Based on a panel regression model with fixed effects, the influence of the actual level of state agrofinancing on the FAO Production Indices of the main types of agroproducts was determined. It is the largest for crops, meat, and milk (a decrease in state funding by USD 1 million threatens to reduce the respective indices by 4.5, 3.47, and 3.79 points), medium for cereals and sugar crops (according to points 2.69 and 2.11), and the smallest for livestock and non-food products (by 1.53 and 0.001 points, respectively).
政府在农业部门的支出:贷款的最佳比例及对农业生产的影响
有效的政府农业政策应该是平衡的:为减轻国家预算压力,必须减少公共开支,鼓励农民使用农业贷款。减少公共开支不应导致农产品市场短缺。本文旨在根据农业部门公共支出和贷款的最佳比例以及农业生产动态对国家融资的依赖性,论证政府农业政策转型的方向。研究基础是粮农组织统计数据库(FAOSTAT)中 2004-2021 年 10 个不同收入水平国家的数据(世界银行)。对每个国家的农业部门国家融资和贷款的最佳比例(由结构建模方法确定)和实际比例进行了比较,并根据农业生产指数进行了调整。建模结果表明,在德国、以色列、意大利和英国,公共资金的比例应该增加,而在阿塞拜疆和格鲁吉亚则应该减少;在美国、俄罗斯、土耳其和乌克兰,目前的比例是最佳的。基于固定效应的面板回归模型,确定了国家农业资金的实际水平对粮农组织主要农产 品生产指数的影响。对农作物、肉类和奶类的影响最大(国家资助每减少 100 万美元,相关指数就会分别下降 4.5、3.47 和 3.79 个点),对谷物和糖类作物的影响中等(分别为 2.69 和 2.11 个点),对牲畜和非食品产品的影响最小(分别为 1.53 和 0.001 个点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信