Comparing Weights According to Weighing Cycles with Nonlinear Drift of the Comparator

Y. Kamenskikh, V. Snegov
{"title":"Comparing Weights According to Weighing Cycles with Nonlinear Drift of the Comparator","authors":"Y. Kamenskikh, V. Snegov","doi":"10.20915/2077-1177-2024-20-2-23-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cycle weighing is used by metrologists around the world to eliminate drift in comparator readings when comparing the mass of reference weights. Various types of cycles and their descriptions are given in the International Recommendation on legal metrology OIML R111-1-2004 adopted in the Russian Federation as a national standard. They consider cycles under the assumption of linear drift of comparator readings. The article discusses weighing cycles that eliminate nonlinear drift of the comparator. Drift models are proposed in the form of exponential and multinomial laws, which are characterized by a fast dependence of readings at the beginning of the cycle and a slower one at the end of the cycle. The derivation of formulas for the difference between the mass of the verified and the original standard according to four comparator readings at equal time intervals is given. The formulas consist of two components: the first coincides with the formula for linear drift, and the second plays the role of a correction for the drift deviation from linearity. The formulas are also correct for linear drift, since in this case the second components become zero. Estimates of the differences in the mass of the compared weights, taking into account the nonlinearity of the comparator drift, make it possible to estimate the measurement uncertainty for linear and nonlinear drift and become relevant with a constant increase in weighing accuracy, especially when comparing high-precision mass standards.","PeriodicalId":324937,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Standards. Reference Materials","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Standards. Reference Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2024-20-2-23-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cycle weighing is used by metrologists around the world to eliminate drift in comparator readings when comparing the mass of reference weights. Various types of cycles and their descriptions are given in the International Recommendation on legal metrology OIML R111-1-2004 adopted in the Russian Federation as a national standard. They consider cycles under the assumption of linear drift of comparator readings. The article discusses weighing cycles that eliminate nonlinear drift of the comparator. Drift models are proposed in the form of exponential and multinomial laws, which are characterized by a fast dependence of readings at the beginning of the cycle and a slower one at the end of the cycle. The derivation of formulas for the difference between the mass of the verified and the original standard according to four comparator readings at equal time intervals is given. The formulas consist of two components: the first coincides with the formula for linear drift, and the second plays the role of a correction for the drift deviation from linearity. The formulas are also correct for linear drift, since in this case the second components become zero. Estimates of the differences in the mass of the compared weights, taking into account the nonlinearity of the comparator drift, make it possible to estimate the measurement uncertainty for linear and nonlinear drift and become relevant with a constant increase in weighing accuracy, especially when comparing high-precision mass standards.
根据比较器非线性漂移的称重周期比较重量
世界各地的计量人员在比较参考砝码的质量时,都使用周期称量来消除比较仪读数的漂移。关于法定计量的国际建议 OIML R111-1-2004 中给出了各种类型的循环及其说明,俄罗斯联邦已将其采纳为国家标准。它们考虑了比较器读数线性漂移假设下的周期。本文讨论了消除比较器非线性漂移的称重周期。提出了指数规律和多项式规律形式的漂移模型,其特点是周期开始时读数变化快,周期结束时读数变化慢。根据四个比较器在相等时间间隔内的读数,推导出被验证质量与原始标准质量之间差值的公式。公式由两部分组成:第一部分与线性漂移公式相吻合,第二部分对偏离线性的漂移进行校正。这些公式对于线性漂移也是正确的,因为在这种情况下,第二部分变为零。考虑到比较仪漂移的非线性,对比较砝码质量差异的估算可以估算出线性漂移和非线性漂移的测量不确定度,并随着称量精度的不断提高而变得相关,尤其是在比较高精度质量标准时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书