Problems of studying deposits with cross-border territories: a case study of the Krasnoleninskoye oil and gas condensate field (in the form of a discussion)

A. А. Kungurov, L. K. Alimchanova
{"title":"Problems of studying deposits with cross-border territories: a case study of the Krasnoleninskoye oil and gas condensate field (in the form of a discussion)","authors":"A. А. Kungurov, L. K. Alimchanova","doi":"10.31660/0445-0108-2024-3-24-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   The territorial affiliation of one field to different subsurface users gives rise to a number of problems when calculating hydrocarbon reserves and justifying calculation parameters. This is due to the lack of complete information on a cross-border field from one owner of the subsoil.   The aim of the article is to demonstrate the problems of modeling and calculating reserves of cross-border deposits and proposals for their solution. The article briefly describes the history of geological exploration at the Krasnoleninskoye oil and gas condensate field and the history of modeling and calculating reserves.   The difference in the correlation of productive layers is shown. Various methods of delineation of deposits within subsurface use sites are considered. The difficulties of modeling due to the presence of several subsurface users of one cross-border deposit are listed. Specific examples of problems of matching models and calculation of reserves of two subsurface users are given. The problem of combining several fields based on the results of geological exploration is outlined. Conclusions are drawn about the advantages of a single model of cross-border deposits and their benefits for the state. The solution to the problem is the exchange of accumulated geological and commercial information between neighboring subsoil users and an agreement on joint actions to study the field, including work on estimating reserves and on design solutions. Consequently, a unified geological model of the deposit will be established, along with uniform methodologies for classification, mining fund allocation, and the optimal distribution of production. Additionally, the resolution of tax authority-related issues will be facilitated.","PeriodicalId":240239,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Gas Studies","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Gas Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2024-3-24-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   The territorial affiliation of one field to different subsurface users gives rise to a number of problems when calculating hydrocarbon reserves and justifying calculation parameters. This is due to the lack of complete information on a cross-border field from one owner of the subsoil.   The aim of the article is to demonstrate the problems of modeling and calculating reserves of cross-border deposits and proposals for their solution. The article briefly describes the history of geological exploration at the Krasnoleninskoye oil and gas condensate field and the history of modeling and calculating reserves.   The difference in the correlation of productive layers is shown. Various methods of delineation of deposits within subsurface use sites are considered. The difficulties of modeling due to the presence of several subsurface users of one cross-border deposit are listed. Specific examples of problems of matching models and calculation of reserves of two subsurface users are given. The problem of combining several fields based on the results of geological exploration is outlined. Conclusions are drawn about the advantages of a single model of cross-border deposits and their benefits for the state. The solution to the problem is the exchange of accumulated geological and commercial information between neighboring subsoil users and an agreement on joint actions to study the field, including work on estimating reserves and on design solutions. Consequently, a unified geological model of the deposit will be established, along with uniform methodologies for classification, mining fund allocation, and the optimal distribution of production. Additionally, the resolution of tax authority-related issues will be facilitated.
跨界矿藏研究问题:克拉斯诺列宁斯阔耶油气凝析油田案例研究(讨论形式)
在计算油气储量和确定计算参数时,一个油气田隶属于不同的地下用户会产生一些问题。这是由于缺乏来自一个地下所有者的关于跨境油气田的完整信息。 文章旨在说明跨境矿藏储量建模和计算的问题以及解决这些问题的建议。文章简要介绍了 Krasnoleninskoye 油气凝析油田的地质勘探历史以及储量建模和计算历史。 文章显示了生产层相关性的差异。考虑了在地下使用地点内划分矿藏的各种方法。列举了由于一个跨境矿床存在多个地下使用者而造成的建模困难。举例说明了两个地下使用者的模型匹配和储量计算问题。概述了根据地质勘探结果将几个油气田结合起来的问题。就跨境矿藏单一模型的优势及其对国家的益处得出了结论。解决问题的办法是在相邻的底土使用者之间交换积累的地质和商业信息,并就联合行动研究油田(包括储量估算和设计方案)达成协议。因此,将建立一个统一的矿藏地质模型,以及统一的分类、采矿资金分配和生产优化分配方法。此外,还将促进解决与税务部门有关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信